All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com>
To: tomi.valkeinen@ti.com
Cc: plagnioj@jcrosoft.com, pali.rohar@gmail.com, pavel@ucw.cz,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Ivaylo Dimitrov <freemangordon@abv.bg>
Subject: [PATCH v2] ARM: OMAPFB: panel-sony-acx565akm: fix missing mutex unlocks
Date: Sun,  5 Jan 2014 15:13:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1388927585-5640-1-git-send-email-ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52C956E9.2030008@gmail.com>

From: Ivaylo Dimitrov <freemangordon@abv.bg>

Commit c37dd677988ca50bc8bc60ab5ab053720583c168 fixes the unbalanced
unlock in acx565akm_enable but introduces another problem - if
acx565akm_panel_power_on exits early, the mutex is not unlocked. Fix
that by unlocking the mutex on early return. Also add mutex protection in
acx565akm_panel_power_off and remove an unused variable

Signed-off-by: Ivaylo Dimitrov <freemangordon@abv.bg>
---
 .../omap2/displays-new/panel-sony-acx565akm.c      |   16 ++++++++++------
 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/video/omap2/displays-new/panel-sony-acx565akm.c b/drivers/video/omap2/displays-new/panel-sony-acx565akm.c
index d94f35d..9aef7fa 100644
--- a/drivers/video/omap2/displays-new/panel-sony-acx565akm.c
+++ b/drivers/video/omap2/displays-new/panel-sony-acx565akm.c
@@ -535,6 +535,7 @@ static int acx565akm_panel_power_on(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev)
 
 	r = in->ops.sdi->enable(in);
 	if (r) {
+		mutex_unlock(&ddata->mutex);
 		pr_err("%s sdi enable failed\n", __func__);
 		return r;
 	}
@@ -546,6 +547,7 @@ static int acx565akm_panel_power_on(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev)
 		gpio_set_value(ddata->reset_gpio, 1);
 
 	if (ddata->enabled) {
+		mutex_unlock(&ddata->mutex);
 		dev_dbg(&ddata->spi->dev, "panel already enabled\n");
 		return 0;
 	}
@@ -578,10 +580,14 @@ static void acx565akm_panel_power_off(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev)
 	struct panel_drv_data *ddata = to_panel_data(dssdev);
 	struct omap_dss_device *in = ddata->in;
 
+	mutex_lock(&ddata->mutex);
+
 	dev_dbg(dssdev->dev, "%s\n", __func__);
 
-	if (!ddata->enabled)
+	if (!ddata->enabled) {
+		mutex_unlock(&ddata->mutex);
 		return;
+	}
 
 	set_display_state(ddata, 0);
 	set_sleep_mode(ddata, 1);
@@ -601,11 +607,13 @@ static void acx565akm_panel_power_off(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev)
 	msleep(100);
 
 	in->ops.sdi->disable(in);
+
+	mutex_unlock(&ddata->mutex);
+
 }
 
 static int acx565akm_enable(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev)
 {
-	struct panel_drv_data *ddata = to_panel_data(dssdev);
 	int r;
 
 	dev_dbg(dssdev->dev, "%s\n", __func__);
@@ -627,16 +635,12 @@ static int acx565akm_enable(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev)
 
 static void acx565akm_disable(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev)
 {
-	struct panel_drv_data *ddata = to_panel_data(dssdev);
-
 	dev_dbg(dssdev->dev, "%s\n", __func__);
 
 	if (!omapdss_device_is_enabled(dssdev))
 		return;
 
-	mutex_lock(&ddata->mutex);
 	acx565akm_panel_power_off(dssdev);
-	mutex_unlock(&ddata->mutex);
 
 	dssdev->state = OMAP_DSS_DISPLAY_DISABLED;
 }
-- 
1.5.6.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com>
To: tomi.valkeinen@ti.com
Cc: plagnioj@jcrosoft.com, pali.rohar@gmail.com, pavel@ucw.cz,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Ivaylo Dimitrov <freemangordon@abv.bg>
Subject: [PATCH v2] ARM: OMAPFB: panel-sony-acx565akm: fix missing mutex unlocks
Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2014 13:13:05 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1388927585-5640-1-git-send-email-ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52C956E9.2030008@gmail.com>

From: Ivaylo Dimitrov <freemangordon@abv.bg>

Commit c37dd677988ca50bc8bc60ab5ab053720583c168 fixes the unbalanced
unlock in acx565akm_enable but introduces another problem - if
acx565akm_panel_power_on exits early, the mutex is not unlocked. Fix
that by unlocking the mutex on early return. Also add mutex protection in
acx565akm_panel_power_off and remove an unused variable

Signed-off-by: Ivaylo Dimitrov <freemangordon@abv.bg>
---
 .../omap2/displays-new/panel-sony-acx565akm.c      |   16 ++++++++++------
 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/video/omap2/displays-new/panel-sony-acx565akm.c b/drivers/video/omap2/displays-new/panel-sony-acx565akm.c
index d94f35d..9aef7fa 100644
--- a/drivers/video/omap2/displays-new/panel-sony-acx565akm.c
+++ b/drivers/video/omap2/displays-new/panel-sony-acx565akm.c
@@ -535,6 +535,7 @@ static int acx565akm_panel_power_on(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev)
 
 	r = in->ops.sdi->enable(in);
 	if (r) {
+		mutex_unlock(&ddata->mutex);
 		pr_err("%s sdi enable failed\n", __func__);
 		return r;
 	}
@@ -546,6 +547,7 @@ static int acx565akm_panel_power_on(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev)
 		gpio_set_value(ddata->reset_gpio, 1);
 
 	if (ddata->enabled) {
+		mutex_unlock(&ddata->mutex);
 		dev_dbg(&ddata->spi->dev, "panel already enabled\n");
 		return 0;
 	}
@@ -578,10 +580,14 @@ static void acx565akm_panel_power_off(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev)
 	struct panel_drv_data *ddata = to_panel_data(dssdev);
 	struct omap_dss_device *in = ddata->in;
 
+	mutex_lock(&ddata->mutex);
+
 	dev_dbg(dssdev->dev, "%s\n", __func__);
 
-	if (!ddata->enabled)
+	if (!ddata->enabled) {
+		mutex_unlock(&ddata->mutex);
 		return;
+	}
 
 	set_display_state(ddata, 0);
 	set_sleep_mode(ddata, 1);
@@ -601,11 +607,13 @@ static void acx565akm_panel_power_off(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev)
 	msleep(100);
 
 	in->ops.sdi->disable(in);
+
+	mutex_unlock(&ddata->mutex);
+
 }
 
 static int acx565akm_enable(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev)
 {
-	struct panel_drv_data *ddata = to_panel_data(dssdev);
 	int r;
 
 	dev_dbg(dssdev->dev, "%s\n", __func__);
@@ -627,16 +635,12 @@ static int acx565akm_enable(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev)
 
 static void acx565akm_disable(struct omap_dss_device *dssdev)
 {
-	struct panel_drv_data *ddata = to_panel_data(dssdev);
-
 	dev_dbg(dssdev->dev, "%s\n", __func__);
 
 	if (!omapdss_device_is_enabled(dssdev))
 		return;
 
-	mutex_lock(&ddata->mutex);
 	acx565akm_panel_power_off(dssdev);
-	mutex_unlock(&ddata->mutex);
 
 	dssdev->state = OMAP_DSS_DISPLAY_DISABLED;
 }
-- 
1.5.6.1


  reply	other threads:[~2014-01-05 13:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-30 16:17 [PATCH] ARM: OMAPFB: panel-sony-acx565akm: fix missing mutex unlocks Ivaylo Dimitrov
2013-12-30 16:17 ` Ivaylo Dimitrov
2014-01-04 12:51 ` Pavel Machek
2014-01-04 12:51   ` Pavel Machek
2014-01-05 12:58   ` Ivaylo Dimitrov
2014-01-05 12:58     ` Ivaylo Dimitrov
2014-01-05 13:13     ` Ivaylo Dimitrov [this message]
2014-01-05 13:13       ` [PATCH v2] " Ivaylo Dimitrov
2014-01-10 10:56       ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-01-10 10:56         ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-01-10 10:56         ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-01-11  9:39         ` Ivaylo Dimitrov
2014-01-11  9:39           ` Ivaylo Dimitrov
2014-01-13 10:20           ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-01-13 10:20             ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-01-13 10:20             ` Tomi Valkeinen
2015-12-25 13:29             ` Ivaylo Dimitrov
2015-12-25 13:29               ` Ivaylo Dimitrov
2015-12-29  7:46               ` Tomi Valkeinen
2015-12-29  7:46                 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2015-12-29  7:46                 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2016-01-01 12:25                 ` Ivaylo Dimitrov
2016-01-01 12:25                   ` Ivaylo Dimitrov
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-11-06 21:24 [PATCH] ARM: OMAPFB: panel-sony-acx565akm: fix bad unlock balance Aaro Koskinen
2013-11-06 21:24 ` Aaro Koskinen
2013-11-11 13:37 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2013-11-11 13:37   ` Tomi Valkeinen
2013-11-11 18:37   ` Aaro Koskinen
2013-11-11 18:37     ` Aaro Koskinen
2013-12-06 12:55 ` [PATCH] ARM: OMAPFB: panel-sony-acx565akm: fix missing unlock in acx565akm_panel_power_on() Wei Yongjun
2013-12-06 12:55   ` Wei Yongjun
2013-12-11 14:29   ` Tomi Valkeinen
2013-12-11 14:29     ` Tomi Valkeinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1388927585-5640-1-git-send-email-ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com \
    --to=ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com \
    --cc=freemangordon@abv.bg \
    --cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pali.rohar@gmail.com \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
    --cc=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.