All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: riel@redhat.com
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, peterz@infradead.org,
	chegu_vinod@hp.com, aarcange@redhat.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: [PATCH -mm 0/3] fix numa vs kvm scalability issue
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 17:12:43 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1392761566-24834-1-git-send-email-riel@redhat.com> (raw)

The NUMA scanning code can end up iterating over many gigabytes
of unpopulated memory, especially in the case of a freshly started
KVM guest with lots of memory.

This results in the mmu notifier code being called even when
there are no mapped pages in a virtual address range. The amount
of time wasted can be enough to trigger soft lockup warnings
with very large (>2TB) KVM guests.

This patch moves the mmu notifier call to the pmd level, which
represents 1GB areas of memory on x86-64. Furthermore, the mmu
notifier code is only called from the address in the PMD where
present mappings are first encountered.

The hugetlbfs code is left alone for now; hugetlb mappings are
not relocatable, and as such are left alone by the NUMA code,
and should never trigger this problem to begin with.

The series also adds a cond_resched to task_numa_work, to
fix another potential latency issue.


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: riel@redhat.com
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, peterz@infradead.org,
	chegu_vinod@hp.com, aarcange@redhat.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: [PATCH -mm 0/3] fix numa vs kvm scalability issue
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 17:12:43 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1392761566-24834-1-git-send-email-riel@redhat.com> (raw)

The NUMA scanning code can end up iterating over many gigabytes
of unpopulated memory, especially in the case of a freshly started
KVM guest with lots of memory.

This results in the mmu notifier code being called even when
there are no mapped pages in a virtual address range. The amount
of time wasted can be enough to trigger soft lockup warnings
with very large (>2TB) KVM guests.

This patch moves the mmu notifier call to the pmd level, which
represents 1GB areas of memory on x86-64. Furthermore, the mmu
notifier code is only called from the address in the PMD where
present mappings are first encountered.

The hugetlbfs code is left alone for now; hugetlb mappings are
not relocatable, and as such are left alone by the NUMA code,
and should never trigger this problem to begin with.

The series also adds a cond_resched to task_numa_work, to
fix another potential latency issue.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

             reply	other threads:[~2014-02-18 22:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-18 22:12 riel [this message]
2014-02-18 22:12 ` [PATCH -mm 0/3] fix numa vs kvm scalability issue riel
2014-02-18 22:12 ` [PATCH -mm 1/3] sched,numa: add cond_resched to task_numa_work riel
2014-02-18 22:12   ` riel
2014-02-21 20:32   ` [tip:sched/urgent] " tip-bot for Rik van Riel
2014-02-18 22:12 ` [PATCH -mm 2/3] mm,numa: reorganize change_pmd_range riel
2014-02-18 22:12   ` riel
2014-02-19  2:22   ` David Rientjes
2014-02-19  2:22     ` David Rientjes
2014-02-18 22:12 ` [PATCH -mm 3/3] move mmu notifier call from change_protection to change_pmd_range riel
2014-02-18 22:12   ` riel
2014-02-19  2:24   ` David Rientjes
2014-02-19  2:24     ` David Rientjes
2014-02-19  3:08     ` Rik van Riel
2014-02-19  3:08       ` Rik van Riel
2014-02-19  3:18     ` [PATCH -mm v2 " Rik van Riel
2014-02-19  3:18       ` Rik van Riel
2014-02-19  8:59 ` [PATCH -mm 0/3] fix numa vs kvm scalability issue Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-19  8:59   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-19 19:28   ` Andrew Morton
2014-02-19 19:28     ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1392761566-24834-1-git-send-email-riel@redhat.com \
    --to=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chegu_vinod@hp.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.