From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> Subject: [PATCH 3/8] ARM: dts: rockchip: Remove skeleton.dtsi inclusion in rk3288.dtsi Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2016 10:01:04 -0400 [thread overview] Message-ID: <1473429669-6185-4-git-send-email-javier@osg.samsung.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1473429669-6185-1-git-send-email-javier@osg.samsung.com> The skeleton.dtsi file was removed in ARM64 for different reasons as explained in commit ("3ebee5a2e141 arm64: dts: kill skeleton.dtsi"). These also applies to ARM and it will also allow to get rid of the following DTC warnings in the future: "Node /memory has a reg or ranges property, but no unit name" The disassembled DTB are almost the same, besides empty chosen nodes being removed. So the change should not have a functional impact. Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> --- arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi index 17ec2e2d7a60..2cf1eb2e6202 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi @@ -46,9 +46,11 @@ #include <dt-bindings/thermal/thermal.h> #include <dt-bindings/power/rk3288-power.h> #include <dt-bindings/soc/rockchip,boot-mode.h> -#include "skeleton.dtsi" / { + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <1>; + compatible = "rockchip,rk3288"; interrupt-parent = <&gic>; -- 2.7.4
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: javier@osg.samsung.com (Javier Martinez Canillas) To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH 3/8] ARM: dts: rockchip: Remove skeleton.dtsi inclusion in rk3288.dtsi Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2016 10:01:04 -0400 [thread overview] Message-ID: <1473429669-6185-4-git-send-email-javier@osg.samsung.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1473429669-6185-1-git-send-email-javier@osg.samsung.com> The skeleton.dtsi file was removed in ARM64 for different reasons as explained in commit ("3ebee5a2e141 arm64: dts: kill skeleton.dtsi"). These also applies to ARM and it will also allow to get rid of the following DTC warnings in the future: "Node /memory has a reg or ranges property, but no unit name" The disassembled DTB are almost the same, besides empty chosen nodes being removed. So the change should not have a functional impact. Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> --- arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi index 17ec2e2d7a60..2cf1eb2e6202 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3288.dtsi @@ -46,9 +46,11 @@ #include <dt-bindings/thermal/thermal.h> #include <dt-bindings/power/rk3288-power.h> #include <dt-bindings/soc/rockchip,boot-mode.h> -#include "skeleton.dtsi" / { + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <1>; + compatible = "rockchip,rk3288"; interrupt-parent = <&gic>; -- 2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-09 14:01 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2016-09-09 14:01 [PATCH 0/8] ARM: dts: rockchip: Remove skeleton.dtsi usage and fix memory node DTC warnings Javier Martinez Canillas 2016-09-09 14:01 ` Javier Martinez Canillas 2016-09-09 14:01 ` Javier Martinez Canillas 2016-09-09 14:01 ` [PATCH 1/8] ARM: dts: rockchip: Remove skeleton.dtsi inclusion in rk3036.dtsi Javier Martinez Canillas 2016-09-09 14:01 ` Javier Martinez Canillas 2016-09-09 14:01 ` [PATCH 2/8] ARM: dts: rockchip: Remove skeleton.dtsi inclusion in rk322x.dtsi Javier Martinez Canillas 2016-09-09 14:01 ` Javier Martinez Canillas 2016-09-09 14:01 ` Javier Martinez Canillas 2016-09-09 14:01 ` Javier Martinez Canillas [this message] 2016-09-09 14:01 ` [PATCH 3/8] ARM: dts: rockchip: Remove skeleton.dtsi inclusion in rk3288.dtsi Javier Martinez Canillas 2016-09-09 14:01 ` [PATCH 4/8] ARM: dts: rockchip: Remove skeleton.dtsi inclusion in rk3xxx.dtsi Javier Martinez Canillas 2016-09-09 14:01 ` Javier Martinez Canillas 2016-09-09 14:01 ` [PATCH 5/8] ARM: dts: rockchip: Add missing unit name to memory nodes in rk3036 boards Javier Martinez Canillas 2016-09-09 14:01 ` Javier Martinez Canillas 2016-09-09 14:01 ` [PATCH 6/8] ARM: dts: rockchip: Add missing unit name to memory nodes in rk322x boards Javier Martinez Canillas 2016-09-09 14:01 ` Javier Martinez Canillas 2016-09-09 14:01 ` Javier Martinez Canillas 2016-09-09 14:01 ` [PATCH 7/8] ARM: dts: rockchip: Add missing unit name to memory nodes in rk3288 boards Javier Martinez Canillas 2016-09-09 14:01 ` Javier Martinez Canillas 2016-09-09 14:01 ` [PATCH 8/8] ARM: dts: rockchip: Add missing unit name to memory nodes in rk3xxx boards Javier Martinez Canillas 2016-09-09 14:01 ` Javier Martinez Canillas 2016-09-10 21:51 ` [PATCH 0/8] ARM: dts: rockchip: Remove skeleton.dtsi usage and fix memory node DTC warnings Heiko Stuebner 2016-09-10 21:51 ` Heiko Stuebner 2016-09-10 21:51 ` Heiko Stuebner
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=1473429669-6185-4-git-send-email-javier@osg.samsung.com \ --to=javier@osg.samsung.com \ --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=heiko@sntech.de \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \ --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.