From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> To: "Roberts, William C" <william.c.roberts@intel.com> Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "apw@canonical.com" <apw@canonical.com>, "kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: add warning on %pk instead of %pK usage Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 14:20:41 -0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <1487024441.6214.12.camel@perches.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <476DC76E7D1DF2438D32BFADF679FC562305F62F@ORSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com> [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2383 bytes --] (Adding back the cc's) On Mon, 2017-02-13 at 21:28 +0000, Roberts, William C wrote: > <snip> > > No worries. > > No idea why it doesn't work for you. > > Maybe the hand applying was somehow > > faulty? > > > > The attached is on top of -next so it does have offsets on Linus' tree, but it seems > > to work. > > > > (on -linux) > > > > $ patch -p1 < cp_vsp.diff > > patching file scripts/checkpatch.pl > > Hunk #1 succeeded at 5634 (offset -36 lines). > > > > $ cat t_block.c > > { > > MY_DEBUG(drv->foo, > > "%pk", > > foo->boo); > > } > > $ ./scripts/checkpatch.pl -f t_block.c > > WARNING: Invalid vsprintf pointer extension '%pk' > > #2: FILE: t_block.c:2: > > + MY_DEBUG(drv->foo, > > + "%pk", > > + foo->boo); > > > > total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 5 lines checked > > > > NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to > > mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace. > > > > t_block.c has style problems, please review. > > > > NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report > > them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. > > > Applied. It works fine with your example (see attached 0001-tblock.patch) but it doesn't provide > Output for me with 0002-drv-hack.patch (attached as well) > > $ ./scripts/checkpatch.pl 0002-drv-hack.patch > total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 10 lines checked > > 0002-drv-hack.patch has no obvious style problems and is ready for submission. > > ./scripts/checkpatch.pl 0001-tblock.patch > WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating? > #13: > new file mode 100644 > > WARNING: Invalid vsprintf pointer extension '%pk' > #19: FILE: t_block.c:2: > + MY_DEBUG(drv->foo, > + "%pk", > + foo->boo); > > total: 0 errors, 2 warnings, 6 lines checked > > NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to > mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace. > > 0001-tblock.patch has style problems, please review. > > NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report > them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. This means _all_ the $stat checks aren't being done on patches that add just a single multi-line statement. Andrew? Any thoughts on how to enable $stat appropriately for patch contexts with a single multi-line statement? [-- Attachment #2: 1.patch --] [-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 695 bytes --] From 00191661141fb11abac22efe98ee58d37a9d9391 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: William Roberts <william.c.roberts@intel.com> Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 11:35:03 -0800 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] drv hack Signed-off-by: William Roberts <william.c.roberts@intel.com> --- drivers/char/applicom.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/char/applicom.c b/drivers/char/applicom.c index e5c62dc..4f6934d 100644 --- a/drivers/char/applicom.c +++ b/drivers/char/applicom.c @@ -153,6 +153,10 @@ static int ac_register_board(unsigned long physloc, void __iomem *loc, return 0; } + MY_DEBUG(drv->foo, + "%pk", + foo->boo); + boardno--; apbs[boardno].PhysIO = physloc; -- 2.7.4
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> To: "Roberts, William C" <william.c.roberts@intel.com> Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "apw@canonical.com" <apw@canonical.com>, "kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com> Subject: [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: add warning on %pk instead of %pK usage Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 14:20:41 -0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <1487024441.6214.12.camel@perches.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <476DC76E7D1DF2438D32BFADF679FC562305F62F@ORSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com> [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2383 bytes --] (Adding back the cc's) On Mon, 2017-02-13 at 21:28 +0000, Roberts, William C wrote: > <snip> > > No worries. > > No idea why it doesn't work for you. > > Maybe the hand applying was somehow > > faulty? > > > > The attached is on top of -next so it does have offsets on Linus' tree, but it seems > > to work. > > > > (on -linux) > > > > $ patch -p1 < cp_vsp.diff > > patching file scripts/checkpatch.pl > > Hunk #1 succeeded at 5634 (offset -36 lines). > > > > $ cat t_block.c > > { > > MY_DEBUG(drv->foo, > > "%pk", > > foo->boo); > > } > > $ ./scripts/checkpatch.pl -f t_block.c > > WARNING: Invalid vsprintf pointer extension '%pk' > > #2: FILE: t_block.c:2: > > + MY_DEBUG(drv->foo, > > + "%pk", > > + foo->boo); > > > > total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 5 lines checked > > > > NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to > > mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace. > > > > t_block.c has style problems, please review. > > > > NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report > > them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. > > > Applied. It works fine with your example (see attached 0001-tblock.patch) but it doesn't provide > Output for me with 0002-drv-hack.patch (attached as well) > > $ ./scripts/checkpatch.pl 0002-drv-hack.patch > total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 10 lines checked > > 0002-drv-hack.patch has no obvious style problems and is ready for submission. > > ./scripts/checkpatch.pl 0001-tblock.patch > WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating? > #13: > new file mode 100644 > > WARNING: Invalid vsprintf pointer extension '%pk' > #19: FILE: t_block.c:2: > + MY_DEBUG(drv->foo, > + "%pk", > + foo->boo); > > total: 0 errors, 2 warnings, 6 lines checked > > NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to > mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace. > > 0001-tblock.patch has style problems, please review. > > NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report > them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. This means _all_ the $stat checks aren't being done on patches that add just a single multi-line statement. Andrew? Any thoughts on how to enable $stat appropriately for patch contexts with a single multi-line statement? [-- Attachment #2: 1.patch --] [-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 695 bytes --] From 00191661141fb11abac22efe98ee58d37a9d9391 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: William Roberts <william.c.roberts@intel.com> Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 11:35:03 -0800 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] drv hack Signed-off-by: William Roberts <william.c.roberts@intel.com> --- drivers/char/applicom.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/char/applicom.c b/drivers/char/applicom.c index e5c62dc..4f6934d 100644 --- a/drivers/char/applicom.c +++ b/drivers/char/applicom.c @@ -153,6 +153,10 @@ static int ac_register_board(unsigned long physloc, void __iomem *loc, return 0; } + MY_DEBUG(drv->foo, + "%pk", + foo->boo); + boardno--; apbs[boardno].PhysIO = physloc; -- 2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-13 22:20 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2017-02-10 19:37 [PATCH] checkpatch: add warning on %pk instead of %pK usage william.c.roberts 2017-02-10 19:37 ` [kernel-hardening] " william.c.roberts 2017-02-10 20:12 ` Joe Perches 2017-02-10 20:12 ` [kernel-hardening] " Joe Perches 2017-02-10 22:14 ` Roberts, William C 2017-02-10 22:14 ` [kernel-hardening] " Roberts, William C 2017-02-10 22:26 ` Roberts, William C 2017-02-10 22:26 ` [kernel-hardening] " Roberts, William C 2017-02-10 22:49 ` Joe Perches 2017-02-10 22:49 ` [kernel-hardening] " Joe Perches 2017-02-10 22:59 ` Joe Perches 2017-02-10 22:59 ` [kernel-hardening] " Joe Perches 2017-02-10 23:31 ` Roberts, William C 2017-02-10 23:31 ` [kernel-hardening] " Roberts, William C 2017-02-10 23:49 ` Joe Perches 2017-02-10 23:49 ` [kernel-hardening] " Joe Perches 2017-02-10 23:54 ` Roberts, William C 2017-02-10 23:54 ` [kernel-hardening] " Roberts, William C 2017-02-11 0:01 ` Joe Perches 2017-02-11 0:01 ` [kernel-hardening] " Joe Perches 2017-02-11 1:32 ` Roberts, William C 2017-02-11 1:32 ` [kernel-hardening] " Roberts, William C 2017-02-11 3:23 ` Joe Perches 2017-02-11 3:23 ` [kernel-hardening] " Joe Perches 2017-02-13 19:46 ` Roberts, William C 2017-02-13 19:46 ` [kernel-hardening] " Roberts, William C 2017-02-13 20:14 ` Joe Perches 2017-02-13 20:14 ` [kernel-hardening] " Joe Perches [not found] ` <1487016251.6214.6.camel@perches.com> [not found] ` <476DC76E7D1DF2438D32BFADF679FC562305F62F@ORSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com> 2017-02-13 22:20 ` Joe Perches [this message] 2017-02-13 22:20 ` Joe Perches 2017-02-15 23:49 ` Roberts, William C 2017-02-15 23:49 ` [kernel-hardening] " Roberts, William C 2017-02-16 0:19 ` Joe Perches 2017-02-16 0:19 ` [kernel-hardening] " Joe Perches 2017-02-27 16:26 ` Roberts, William C 2017-02-27 16:26 ` [kernel-hardening] " Roberts, William C 2017-02-27 20:54 ` [PATCH] checkpatch: Add ability to find bad uses of vsprintf %p<foo> extensions Joe Perches 2017-02-27 20:54 ` [kernel-hardening] " Joe Perches 2017-02-27 21:18 ` Kees Cook 2017-02-27 21:18 ` Kees Cook 2017-02-28 15:34 ` Roberts, William C 2017-02-28 15:34 ` [kernel-hardening] " Roberts, William C 2017-03-01 0:06 ` Andrew Morton 2017-03-01 0:06 ` [kernel-hardening] " Andrew Morton 2017-03-01 0:11 ` Kees Cook 2017-03-01 0:11 ` Kees Cook 2017-03-01 1:14 ` Joe Perches 2017-03-01 1:14 ` Joe Perches 2017-03-01 0:12 ` Joe Perches 2017-03-01 0:12 ` [kernel-hardening] " Joe Perches
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=1487024441.6214.12.camel@perches.com \ --to=joe@perches.com \ --cc=apw@canonical.com \ --cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=william.c.roberts@intel.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.