All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Tom Talpey <tom-CLs1Zie5N5HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	bfields-uC3wQj2KruNg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org,
	trond.myklebust-7I+n7zu2hftEKMMhf/gKZA@public.gmane.org
Cc: schumaker.anna-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
	linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	Chuck Lever <chuck.lever-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] sunrpc: flag transports as using IETF approved congestion control protocols
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 15:00:34 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1487880034.3448.8.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2152dfdf-f847-2511-1600-6499b6ea9708-CLs1Zie5N5HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>

On Thu, 2017-02-23 at 14:42 -0500, Tom Talpey wrote:
> On 2/23/2017 12:03 PM, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> > ---
> >  include/linux/sunrpc/svc_xprt.h          | 1 +
> >  net/sunrpc/svcsock.c                     | 1 +
> >  net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c | 2 ++
> 
> There's a possibly-important detail here. Not all RDMA transports have
> "IETF-approved congestion control", for example, RoCEv1. However, iWARP
> and (arguably) RoCEv2 do. On the other hand, as a nonroutable protocol,
> RoCEv1 may not fall under this restriction.
> 
> Net-net, inspecting only the RDMA attribute of the transport may be
> insufficient here.
> 
> It could be argued however that the xprtrdma layer, with its rpcrdma
> crediting, provides such congestion. But that needs to be made
> explicit, and perhaps, discussed in IETF. Initially, I think it would
> be important to flag this as a point for the future. For now, it may
> be best to flag RoCEv1 as not supporting congestion.
> 
> Tom.
> 

(cc'ing Chuck and the linux-rdma list)

Thanks Tom, that's very interesting.

Not being well versed in the xprtrdma layer, what condition should we
use here to set the flag? git grep shows that the string "ROCEV1" only
shows up in the bxnt_en driver. Is there some way to determine this
generically for any given RDMA driver?


> >  3 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/sunrpc/svc_xprt.h b/include/linux/sunrpc/svc_xprt.h
> > index 7440290f64ac..f8aa9452b63c 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/sunrpc/svc_xprt.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/sunrpc/svc_xprt.h
> > @@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ struct svc_xprt {
> >  #define XPT_CACHE_AUTH	11		/* cache auth info */
> >  #define XPT_LOCAL	12		/* connection from loopback interface */
> >  #define XPT_KILL_TEMP   13		/* call xpo_kill_temp_xprt before closing */
> > +#define XPT_CONG_CTRL	14		/* IETF approved congestion control protocol */
> > 
> >  	struct svc_serv		*xpt_server;	/* service for transport */
> >  	atomic_t    	    	xpt_reserved;	/* space on outq that is rsvd */
> > diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> > index de066acdb34e..1956b8b96b2d 100644
> > --- a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> > +++ b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> > @@ -1306,6 +1306,7 @@ static void svc_tcp_init(struct svc_sock *svsk, struct svc_serv *serv)
> >  	svc_xprt_init(sock_net(svsk->sk_sock->sk), &svc_tcp_class,
> >  		      &svsk->sk_xprt, serv);
> >  	set_bit(XPT_CACHE_AUTH, &svsk->sk_xprt.xpt_flags);
> > +	set_bit(XPT_CONG_CTRL, &svsk->sk_xprt.xpt_flags);
> >  	if (sk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN) {
> >  		dprintk("setting up TCP socket for listening\n");
> >  		set_bit(XPT_LISTENER, &svsk->sk_xprt.xpt_flags);
> > diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c
> > index 39652d390a9c..96b4797c2c54 100644
> > --- a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c
> > +++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c
> > @@ -571,6 +571,8 @@ static struct svcxprt_rdma *rdma_create_xprt(struct svc_serv *serv,
> >  	spin_lock_init(&cma_xprt->sc_ctxt_lock);
> >  	spin_lock_init(&cma_xprt->sc_map_lock);
> > 
> > +	set_bit(XPT_CONG_CTRL, &cma_xprt->sc_xprt.xpt_flags);
> > +
> >  	if (listener)
> >  		set_bit(XPT_LISTENER, &cma_xprt->sc_xprt.xpt_flags);
> > 
> > 

-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
To: Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>,
	bfields@fieldses.org, trond.myklebust@primarydata.com
Cc: schumaker.anna@gmail.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
	Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
	linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] sunrpc: flag transports as using IETF approved congestion control protocols
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 15:00:34 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1487880034.3448.8.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2152dfdf-f847-2511-1600-6499b6ea9708@talpey.com>

On Thu, 2017-02-23 at 14:42 -0500, Tom Talpey wrote:
> On 2/23/2017 12:03 PM, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  include/linux/sunrpc/svc_xprt.h          | 1 +
> >  net/sunrpc/svcsock.c                     | 1 +
> >  net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c | 2 ++
> 
> There's a possibly-important detail here. Not all RDMA transports have
> "IETF-approved congestion control", for example, RoCEv1. However, iWARP
> and (arguably) RoCEv2 do. On the other hand, as a nonroutable protocol,
> RoCEv1 may not fall under this restriction.
> 
> Net-net, inspecting only the RDMA attribute of the transport may be
> insufficient here.
> 
> It could be argued however that the xprtrdma layer, with its rpcrdma
> crediting, provides such congestion. But that needs to be made
> explicit, and perhaps, discussed in IETF. Initially, I think it would
> be important to flag this as a point for the future. For now, it may
> be best to flag RoCEv1 as not supporting congestion.
> 
> Tom.
> 

(cc'ing Chuck and the linux-rdma list)

Thanks Tom, that's very interesting.

Not being well versed in the xprtrdma layer, what condition should we
use here to set the flag? git grep shows that the string "ROCEV1" only
shows up in the bxnt_en driver. Is there some way to determine this
generically for any given RDMA driver?


> >  3 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/sunrpc/svc_xprt.h b/include/linux/sunrpc/svc_xprt.h
> > index 7440290f64ac..f8aa9452b63c 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/sunrpc/svc_xprt.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/sunrpc/svc_xprt.h
> > @@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ struct svc_xprt {
> >  #define XPT_CACHE_AUTH	11		/* cache auth info */
> >  #define XPT_LOCAL	12		/* connection from loopback interface */
> >  #define XPT_KILL_TEMP   13		/* call xpo_kill_temp_xprt before closing */
> > +#define XPT_CONG_CTRL	14		/* IETF approved congestion control protocol */
> > 
> >  	struct svc_serv		*xpt_server;	/* service for transport */
> >  	atomic_t    	    	xpt_reserved;	/* space on outq that is rsvd */
> > diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> > index de066acdb34e..1956b8b96b2d 100644
> > --- a/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> > +++ b/net/sunrpc/svcsock.c
> > @@ -1306,6 +1306,7 @@ static void svc_tcp_init(struct svc_sock *svsk, struct svc_serv *serv)
> >  	svc_xprt_init(sock_net(svsk->sk_sock->sk), &svc_tcp_class,
> >  		      &svsk->sk_xprt, serv);
> >  	set_bit(XPT_CACHE_AUTH, &svsk->sk_xprt.xpt_flags);
> > +	set_bit(XPT_CONG_CTRL, &svsk->sk_xprt.xpt_flags);
> >  	if (sk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN) {
> >  		dprintk("setting up TCP socket for listening\n");
> >  		set_bit(XPT_LISTENER, &svsk->sk_xprt.xpt_flags);
> > diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c
> > index 39652d390a9c..96b4797c2c54 100644
> > --- a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c
> > +++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c
> > @@ -571,6 +571,8 @@ static struct svcxprt_rdma *rdma_create_xprt(struct svc_serv *serv,
> >  	spin_lock_init(&cma_xprt->sc_ctxt_lock);
> >  	spin_lock_init(&cma_xprt->sc_map_lock);
> > 
> > +	set_bit(XPT_CONG_CTRL, &cma_xprt->sc_xprt.xpt_flags);
> > +
> >  	if (listener)
> >  		set_bit(XPT_LISTENER, &cma_xprt->sc_xprt.xpt_flags);
> > 
> > 

-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-02-23 20:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-23 17:03 [PATCH 0/4] nfs/nfsd/sunrpc: enforce requirement for congestion control protocols in NFSv4 Jeff Layton
2017-02-23 17:03 ` [PATCH 1/4] sunrpc: flag transports as using IETF approved congestion control protocols Jeff Layton
2017-02-23 19:42   ` Tom Talpey
     [not found]     ` <2152dfdf-f847-2511-1600-6499b6ea9708-CLs1Zie5N5HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2017-02-23 20:00       ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2017-02-23 20:00         ` Jeff Layton
     [not found]         ` <1487880034.3448.8.camel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2017-02-23 20:06           ` Tom Talpey
2017-02-23 20:06             ` Tom Talpey
     [not found]             ` <65056db6-f30a-c44d-b01c-b549887c4895-CLs1Zie5N5HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2017-02-23 20:11               ` J. Bruce Fields
2017-02-23 20:11                 ` J. Bruce Fields
     [not found]                 ` <20170223201109.GC11882-uC3wQj2KruNg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
2017-02-23 20:26                   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2017-02-23 20:26                     ` Jason Gunthorpe
     [not found]                     ` <20170223202609.GC26301-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
2017-02-23 20:33                       ` Tom Talpey
2017-02-23 20:33                         ` Tom Talpey
     [not found]                         ` <18ef37c3-95db-9a2c-dbcb-f579672065d6-CLs1Zie5N5HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2017-02-23 20:55                           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2017-02-23 20:55                             ` Jason Gunthorpe
     [not found]                             ` <20170223205502.GA29673-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
2017-02-24 15:08                               ` Tom Talpey
2017-02-24 15:08                                 ` Tom Talpey
     [not found]                                 ` <4eb1da3d-2690-7647-2d85-cc574bc1d564-CLs1Zie5N5HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2017-02-24 17:17                                   ` Jeff Layton
2017-02-24 17:17                                     ` Jeff Layton
     [not found]                                     ` <1487956644.3314.4.camel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2017-02-24 18:03                                       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2017-02-24 18:03                                         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2017-02-23 20:32                   ` Jeff Layton
2017-02-23 20:32                     ` Jeff Layton
2017-02-23 20:17               ` Chuck Lever
2017-02-23 20:17                 ` Chuck Lever
2017-02-23 20:15     ` Chuck Lever
2017-02-23 17:03 ` [PATCH 2/4] sunrpc: turn bitfield flags in svc_version into bools Jeff Layton
2017-02-23 17:03 ` [PATCH 3/4] nfs/nfsd/sunrpc: enforce congestion control protocol requirement for NFSv4 Jeff Layton
2017-02-23 17:03 ` [PATCH 4/4] sunrpc: don't register UDP port with rpcbind when version needs congestion control Jeff Layton
2017-02-23 17:17 ` [PATCH 0/4] nfs/nfsd/sunrpc: enforce requirement for congestion control protocols in NFSv4 Jeff Layton
2017-02-24 18:25 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] nfs/nfsd/sunrpc: enforce NFSv4 transport requirements Jeff Layton
2017-02-24 18:25   ` [PATCH v2 1/4] sunrpc: turn bitfield flags in svc_version into bools Jeff Layton
2017-02-24 18:25   ` [PATCH v2 2/4] sunrpc: flag transports as having both reliable and ordered delivery, and congestion control Jeff Layton
2017-02-24 18:25   ` [PATCH v2 3/4] nfs/nfsd/sunrpc: enforce transport requirements for NFSv4 Jeff Layton
2017-02-24 18:25   ` [PATCH v2 4/4] sunrpc: don't register UDP port with rpcbind when version needs congestion control Jeff Layton
2017-02-24 18:38   ` [PATCH v2 0/4] nfs/nfsd/sunrpc: enforce NFSv4 transport requirements Chuck Lever
2017-02-24 18:53     ` Jeff Layton
2017-02-24 21:23       ` J. Bruce Fields
2017-02-24 18:53   ` Tom Talpey
2017-02-24 21:22     ` J. Bruce Fields
2017-02-24 21:25   ` J. Bruce Fields
2017-02-24 21:34     ` Jeff Layton
2017-02-24 21:44       ` J. Bruce Fields
2017-02-27 11:59         ` Jeff Layton
2017-02-27 12:08           ` Tom Talpey
2017-02-27 12:55             ` Jeff Layton
2017-02-27 14:20               ` J. Bruce Fields

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1487880034.3448.8.camel@redhat.com \
    --to=jlayton-h+wxahxf7alqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=bfields-uC3wQj2KruNg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=chuck.lever-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=schumaker.anna-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=tom-CLs1Zie5N5HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=trond.myklebust-7I+n7zu2hftEKMMhf/gKZA@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.