All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] drivers: remove incorrect usage/dependency on topology_physical_package_id
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 16:44:13 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1515602655-12740-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> (raw)

Hi all,

There has been ongoing attempt to add ACPI topology support on ARM/ARM64
platform using PPTT. However it was discovered that the physical package
id is mapped to the so called clusters on ARM platforms and they don't
map to the physical socket as in other architectures.

In order to add the correct support for the well defined physical sockets,
we need to find remove the incorrect usage or any dependency on
topology_physical_package_id which currently maps to the clusters.

There's still one pending user of topology_physical_package_id, which is
arm_big_little driver which is used by bL switcher and by TC2 platform.
For now, we can leave that as is until we change the definition even for
ARM32 platforms as it's just used by only 32-bit platforms.

v1->v2:
	- Update change log in patch 1/2 as suggested by Lorenzo
	- Added acks from Viresh and Lorenzo

Sudeep Holla (2):
  drivers: psci: remove cluster terminology and dependency on
    physical_package_id
  cpufreq: scpi: remove arm_big_little dependency

 drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c  | 193 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 drivers/firmware/psci_checker.c |  46 +++++-----
 2 files changed, 200 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)

--
2.7.4

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: sudeep.holla@arm.com (Sudeep Holla)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] drivers: remove incorrect usage/dependency on topology_physical_package_id
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 16:44:13 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1515602655-12740-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> (raw)

Hi all,

There has been ongoing attempt to add ACPI topology support on ARM/ARM64
platform using PPTT. However it was discovered that the physical package
id is mapped to the so called clusters on ARM platforms and they don't
map to the physical socket as in other architectures.

In order to add the correct support for the well defined physical sockets,
we need to find remove the incorrect usage or any dependency on
topology_physical_package_id which currently maps to the clusters.

There's still one pending user of topology_physical_package_id, which is
arm_big_little driver which is used by bL switcher and by TC2 platform.
For now, we can leave that as is until we change the definition even for
ARM32 platforms as it's just used by only 32-bit platforms.

v1->v2:
	- Update change log in patch 1/2 as suggested by Lorenzo
	- Added acks from Viresh and Lorenzo

Sudeep Holla (2):
  drivers: psci: remove cluster terminology and dependency on
    physical_package_id
  cpufreq: scpi: remove arm_big_little dependency

 drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c  | 193 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 drivers/firmware/psci_checker.c |  46 +++++-----
 2 files changed, 200 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)

--
2.7.4

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: sudeep.holla@arm.com (Sudeep Holla)
To: linus-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] drivers: remove incorrect usage/dependency on topology_physical_package_id
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 16:44:13 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1515602655-12740-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> (raw)

Hi all,

There has been ongoing attempt to add ACPI topology support on ARM/ARM64
platform using PPTT. However it was discovered that the physical package
id is mapped to the so called clusters on ARM platforms and they don't
map to the physical socket as in other architectures.

In order to add the correct support for the well defined physical sockets,
we need to find remove the incorrect usage or any dependency on
topology_physical_package_id which currently maps to the clusters.

There's still one pending user of topology_physical_package_id, which is
arm_big_little driver which is used by bL switcher and by TC2 platform.
For now, we can leave that as is until we change the definition even for
ARM32 platforms as it's just used by only 32-bit platforms.

v1->v2:
	- Update change log in patch 1/2 as suggested by Lorenzo
	- Added acks from Viresh and Lorenzo

Sudeep Holla (2):
  drivers: psci: remove cluster terminology and dependency on
    physical_package_id
  cpufreq: scpi: remove arm_big_little dependency

 drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c  | 193 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 drivers/firmware/psci_checker.c |  46 +++++-----
 2 files changed, 200 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)

--
2.7.4

             reply	other threads:[~2018-01-10 16:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-10 16:44 Sudeep Holla [this message]
2018-01-10 16:44 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] drivers: remove incorrect usage/dependency on topology_physical_package_id Sudeep Holla
2018-01-10 16:44 ` Sudeep Holla
2018-01-10 16:44 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] drivers: psci: remove cluster terminology and dependency on physical_package_id Sudeep Holla
2018-01-10 16:44   ` Sudeep Holla
2018-01-10 16:44   ` Sudeep Holla
2018-01-10 16:44 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] cpufreq: scpi: remove arm_big_little dependency Sudeep Holla
2018-01-10 16:44   ` Sudeep Holla
2018-01-10 16:44   ` Sudeep Holla

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1515602655-12740-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=jeremy.linton@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.