From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] arm: remove ARCH_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL
Date: Wed, 1 May 2019 22:56:15 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1556740577-4140-2-git-send-email-rppt@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1556740577-4140-1-git-send-email-rppt@linux.ibm.com>
The ARCH_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL in arch/arm/Kconfig is enabled only when
ARCH_SPARSEMEM_ENABLE=y. But in this case, ARCH_SPARSEMEM_DEFAULT is also
enabled and this in turn enables SPARSEMEM_MANUAL.
Since there is no definition of ARCH_FLATMEM_ENABLE in arch/arm/Kconfig,
SPARSEMEM_MANUAL is the only enabled memory model, hence the final
selection will evaluate to SPARSEMEM=y.
Since ARCH_SPARSEMEM_ENABLE is set to 'y' only by several sub-arch
configurations, the default for must sub-arches would be the falback to
FLATMEM regardless of ARCH_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL.
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
---
arch/arm/Kconfig | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
index 9aed25a..25a69a3 100644
--- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
@@ -1592,9 +1592,6 @@ config ARCH_SPARSEMEM_ENABLE
config ARCH_SPARSEMEM_DEFAULT
def_bool ARCH_SPARSEMEM_ENABLE
-config ARCH_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL
- def_bool ARCH_SPARSEMEM_ENABLE
-
config HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID
def_bool ARCH_HAS_HOLES_MEMORYMODEL || !SPARSEMEM
--
2.7.4
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] arm: remove ARCH_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL
Date: Wed, 01 May 2019 19:56:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1556740577-4140-2-git-send-email-rppt@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1556740577-4140-1-git-send-email-rppt@linux.ibm.com>
The ARCH_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL in arch/arm/Kconfig is enabled only when
ARCH_SPARSEMEM_ENABLE=y. But in this case, ARCH_SPARSEMEM_DEFAULT is also
enabled and this in turn enables SPARSEMEM_MANUAL.
Since there is no definition of ARCH_FLATMEM_ENABLE in arch/arm/Kconfig,
SPARSEMEM_MANUAL is the only enabled memory model, hence the final
selection will evaluate to SPARSEMEM=y.
Since ARCH_SPARSEMEM_ENABLE is set to 'y' only by several sub-arch
configurations, the default for must sub-arches would be the falback to
FLATMEM regardless of ARCH_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL.
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
---
arch/arm/Kconfig | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
index 9aed25a..25a69a3 100644
--- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
@@ -1592,9 +1592,6 @@ config ARCH_SPARSEMEM_ENABLE
config ARCH_SPARSEMEM_DEFAULT
def_bool ARCH_SPARSEMEM_ENABLE
-config ARCH_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL
- def_bool ARCH_SPARSEMEM_ENABLE
-
config HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID
def_bool ARCH_HAS_HOLES_MEMORYMODEL || !SPARSEMEM
--
2.7.4
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] arm: remove ARCH_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL
Date: Wed, 1 May 2019 22:56:15 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1556740577-4140-2-git-send-email-rppt@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1556740577-4140-1-git-send-email-rppt@linux.ibm.com>
The ARCH_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL in arch/arm/Kconfig is enabled only when
ARCH_SPARSEMEM_ENABLE=y. But in this case, ARCH_SPARSEMEM_DEFAULT is also
enabled and this in turn enables SPARSEMEM_MANUAL.
Since there is no definition of ARCH_FLATMEM_ENABLE in arch/arm/Kconfig,
SPARSEMEM_MANUAL is the only enabled memory model, hence the final
selection will evaluate to SPARSEMEM=y.
Since ARCH_SPARSEMEM_ENABLE is set to 'y' only by several sub-arch
configurations, the default for must sub-arches would be the falback to
FLATMEM regardless of ARCH_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL.
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
---
arch/arm/Kconfig | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
index 9aed25a..25a69a3 100644
--- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
@@ -1592,9 +1592,6 @@ config ARCH_SPARSEMEM_ENABLE
config ARCH_SPARSEMEM_DEFAULT
def_bool ARCH_SPARSEMEM_ENABLE
-config ARCH_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL
- def_bool ARCH_SPARSEMEM_ENABLE
-
config HAVE_ARCH_PFN_VALID
def_bool ARCH_HAS_HOLES_MEMORYMODEL || !SPARSEMEM
--
2.7.4
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-01 19:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-01 19:56 [PATCH 0/3] remove ARCH_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL where it has no effect Mike Rapoport
2019-05-01 19:56 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-05-01 19:56 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-05-01 19:56 ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2019-05-01 19:56 ` [PATCH 1/3] arm: remove ARCH_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL Mike Rapoport
2019-05-01 19:56 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-05-01 19:56 ` [PATCH 2/3] s390: " Mike Rapoport
2019-05-01 19:56 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-05-01 19:56 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-05-03 13:47 ` Heiko Carstens
2019-05-03 13:47 ` Heiko Carstens
2019-05-03 13:47 ` Heiko Carstens
2019-05-01 19:56 ` [PATCH 3/3] sparc: " Mike Rapoport
2019-05-01 19:56 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-05-01 19:56 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-05-16 5:19 ` [PATCH 0/3] remove ARCH_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL where it has no effect Mike Rapoport
2019-05-16 5:19 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-05-16 5:19 ` Mike Rapoport
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1556740577-4140-2-git-send-email-rppt@linux.ibm.com \
--to=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.