All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
To: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/13] drm/i915: Pass i915_sched_node around internally
Date: Tue, 07 May 2019 13:26:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <155723201674.2489.2235204020376681080@skylake-alporthouse-com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0bd15b27-fb38-71d1-cf50-2dc7f16104df@linux.intel.com>

Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2019-05-07 13:12:05)
> 
> On 03/05/2019 12:52, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > To simplify the next patch, update bump_priority and schedule to accept
> > the internal i915_sched_ndoe directly and not expect a request pointer.
> > 
> > add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 2/1 up/down: 8/-15 (-7)
> > Function                                     old     new   delta
> > i915_schedule_bump_priority                  109     113      +4
> > i915_schedule                                 50      54      +4
> > __i915_schedule                              922     907     -15
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > ---
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c | 33 +++++++++++++++------------
> >   1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
> > index 4a95cf2201a7..380cb7343a10 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_scheduler.c
> > @@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ static void kick_submission(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, int prio)
> >       tasklet_hi_schedule(&engine->execlists.tasklet);
> >   }
> >   
> > -static void __i915_schedule(struct i915_request *rq,
> > +static void __i915_schedule(struct i915_sched_node *rq,
> 
> Can you not use rq for sched node, but perhaps node?

We use node later on. I kept with rq to try and keep the patch small,
and stick to the current semantics. We could reuse node... That looks
like it is semantically clean.
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2019-05-07 12:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-03 11:52 [PATCH 01/13] drm/i915: Assert breadcrumbs are correctly ordered in the signal handler Chris Wilson
2019-05-03 11:52 ` [PATCH 02/13] drm/i915: Prefer checking the wakeref itself rather than the counter Chris Wilson
2019-05-07 10:48   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-05-03 11:52 ` [PATCH 03/13] drm/i915: Assert the local engine->wakeref is active Chris Wilson
2019-05-07 10:52   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-05-03 11:52 ` [PATCH 04/13] drm/i915/hangcheck: Replace hangcheck.seqno with RING_HEAD Chris Wilson
2019-05-03 11:52 ` [PATCH 05/13] drm/i915: Remove delay for idle_work Chris Wilson
2019-05-07 10:54   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-05-03 11:52 ` [PATCH 06/13] drm/i915: Cancel retire_worker on parking Chris Wilson
2019-05-07 10:55   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-05-03 11:52 ` [PATCH 07/13] drm/i915: Stop spinning for DROP_IDLE (debugfs/i915_drop_caches) Chris Wilson
2019-05-03 11:52 ` [PATCH 08/13] drm/i915: Only reschedule the submission tasklet if preemption is possible Chris Wilson
2019-05-07 11:53   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-05-03 11:52 ` [PATCH 09/13] drm/i915/execlists: Don't apply priority boost for resets Chris Wilson
2019-05-07 12:04   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-05-03 11:52 ` [PATCH 10/13] drm/i915: Rearrange i915_scheduler.c Chris Wilson
2019-05-07 12:06   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-05-03 11:52 ` [PATCH 11/13] drm/i915: Pass i915_sched_node around internally Chris Wilson
2019-05-07 12:12   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-05-07 12:26     ` Chris Wilson [this message]
2019-05-03 11:52 ` [PATCH 12/13] drm/i915: Bump signaler priority on adding a waiter Chris Wilson
2019-05-07 12:46   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-05-07 13:14     ` Chris Wilson
2019-05-07 14:32       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-05-07 14:38       ` Chris Wilson
2019-05-03 11:52 ` [PATCH 13/13] drm/i915: Disable semaphore busywaits on saturated systems Chris Wilson
2019-05-03 12:56 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for series starting with [01/13] drm/i915: Assert breadcrumbs are correctly ordered in the signal handler Patchwork
2019-05-03 13:18 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2019-05-03 13:32 ` [PATCH 01/13] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-05-03 13:37   ` Chris Wilson
2019-05-03 13:49     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-05-03 15:22 ` [PATCH v2] " Chris Wilson
2019-05-07 10:39   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-05-03 15:38 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for series starting with [v2] drm/i915: Assert breadcrumbs are correctly ordered in the signal handler (rev2) Patchwork
2019-05-03 15:53 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2019-05-03 19:22 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=155723201674.2489.2235204020376681080@skylake-alporthouse-com \
    --to=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.