All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Cc: "Sergey Dyasli" <sergey.dyasli@citrix.com>,
	"Ashok Raj" <ashok.raj@intel.com>, "Wei Liu" <wl@xen.org>,
	"Andrew Cooper" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	"Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@suse.com>,
	"Chao Gao" <chao.gao@intel.com>,
	"Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v10 08/16] microcode: pass a patch pointer to apply_microcode()
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 15:22:21 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1568272949-1086-9-git-send-email-chao.gao@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1568272949-1086-1-git-send-email-chao.gao@intel.com>

apply_microcode()'s always loading the cached ucode patch forces
a patch to be stored before being loaded. Make apply_microcode()
accept a patch pointer to remove the limitation so that a patch
can be stored after a successful loading.

Signed-off-by: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
---
 xen/arch/x86/microcode.c        | 2 +-
 xen/arch/x86/microcode_amd.c    | 5 ++---
 xen/arch/x86/microcode_intel.c  | 5 ++---
 xen/include/asm-x86/microcode.h | 2 +-
 4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/microcode.c b/xen/arch/x86/microcode.c
index 5c82a2d..b44e4d7 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/microcode.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/microcode.c
@@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ int microcode_resume_cpu(void)
 
     err = microcode_ops->collect_cpu_info(sig);
     if ( likely(!err) )
-        err = microcode_ops->apply_microcode();
+        err = microcode_ops->apply_microcode(microcode_cache);
     spin_unlock(&microcode_mutex);
 
     return err;
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/microcode_amd.c b/xen/arch/x86/microcode_amd.c
index c96a3b3..c6d2ea3 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/microcode_amd.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/microcode_amd.c
@@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ static enum microcode_match_result compare_patch(
     return MIS_UCODE;
 }
 
-static int apply_microcode(void)
+static int apply_microcode(const struct microcode_patch *patch)
 {
     unsigned long flags;
     uint32_t rev;
@@ -261,7 +261,6 @@ static int apply_microcode(void)
     unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id();
     struct cpu_signature *sig = &per_cpu(cpu_sig, cpu);
     const struct microcode_header_amd *hdr;
-    const struct microcode_patch *patch = microcode_get_cache();
 
     if ( !patch )
         return -ENOENT;
@@ -565,7 +564,7 @@ static int cpu_request_microcode(const void *buf, size_t bufsize)
 
         if ( match_cpu(microcode_get_cache()) )
         {
-            error = apply_microcode();
+            error = apply_microcode(microcode_get_cache());
             if ( error )
                 break;
         }
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/microcode_intel.c b/xen/arch/x86/microcode_intel.c
index 5f1ae2f..b1ec81d 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/microcode_intel.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/microcode_intel.c
@@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ static int get_matching_microcode(const void *mc)
     return 1;
 }
 
-static int apply_microcode(void)
+static int apply_microcode(const struct microcode_patch *patch)
 {
     unsigned long flags;
     uint64_t msr_content;
@@ -331,7 +331,6 @@ static int apply_microcode(void)
     unsigned int cpu_num = raw_smp_processor_id();
     struct cpu_signature *sig = &this_cpu(cpu_sig);
     const struct microcode_intel *mc_intel;
-    const struct microcode_patch *patch = microcode_get_cache();
 
     if ( !patch )
         return -ENOENT;
@@ -429,7 +428,7 @@ static int cpu_request_microcode(const void *buf, size_t size)
         error = offset;
 
     if ( !error && match_cpu(microcode_get_cache()) )
-        error = apply_microcode();
+        error = apply_microcode(microcode_get_cache());
 
     return error;
 }
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/microcode.h b/xen/include/asm-x86/microcode.h
index b0eee0e..02feb09 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-x86/microcode.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/microcode.h
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ struct microcode_patch {
 struct microcode_ops {
     int (*cpu_request_microcode)(const void *buf, size_t size);
     int (*collect_cpu_info)(struct cpu_signature *csig);
-    int (*apply_microcode)(void);
+    int (*apply_microcode)(const struct microcode_patch *patch);
     int (*start_update)(void);
     void (*end_update_percpu)(void);
     void (*free_patch)(void *mc);
-- 
1.8.3.1


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-09-12  7:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-12  7:22 [Xen-devel] [PATCH v10 00/16] improve late microcode loading Chao Gao
2019-09-12  7:22 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v10 01/16] microcode/intel: extend microcode_update_match() Chao Gao
2019-09-12 10:24   ` Jan Beulich
2019-09-13  6:50     ` Jan Beulich
2019-09-13  7:02       ` Chao Gao
2019-09-12  7:22 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v10 02/16] microcode/amd: distinguish old and mismatched ucode in microcode_fits() Chao Gao
2019-09-12  7:22 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v10 03/16] microcode: introduce a global cache of ucode patch Chao Gao
2019-09-12 10:29   ` Jan Beulich
2019-09-12  7:22 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v10 04/16] microcode: clean up microcode_resume_cpu Chao Gao
2019-09-12  7:22 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v10 05/16] microcode: remove struct ucode_cpu_info Chao Gao
2019-09-12  7:22 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v10 06/16] microcode: remove pointless 'cpu' parameter Chao Gao
2019-09-12  7:22 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v10 07/16] microcode/amd: call svm_host_osvw_init() in common code Chao Gao
2019-09-12 12:34   ` Jan Beulich
2019-09-12  7:22 ` Chao Gao [this message]
2019-09-12  7:22 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v10 09/16] microcode: split out apply_microcode() from cpu_request_microcode() Chao Gao
2019-09-12 14:07   ` Jan Beulich
2019-09-13  6:47     ` Chao Gao
2019-09-12  7:22 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v10 10/16] microcode: unify ucode loading during system bootup and resuming Chao Gao
2019-09-12 14:59   ` Jan Beulich
2019-09-12  7:22 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v10 11/16] microcode: reduce memory allocation and copy when creating a patch Chao Gao
2019-09-12 15:04   ` Jan Beulich
2019-09-12  7:22 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v10 12/16] x86/microcode: Synchronize late microcode loading Chao Gao
2019-09-12 15:32   ` Jan Beulich
2019-09-13  7:01     ` Chao Gao
2019-09-13  7:15       ` Jan Beulich
2019-09-12  7:22 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v10 13/16] microcode: remove microcode_update_lock Chao Gao
2019-09-12  7:22 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v10 14/16] microcode: rendezvous CPUs in NMI handler and load ucode Chao Gao
2019-09-13  9:14   ` Jan Beulich
2019-09-16  3:18     ` Chao Gao
2019-09-16  8:22       ` Jan Beulich
2019-09-13  9:18   ` Jan Beulich
2019-09-12  7:22 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v10 15/16] microcode: disable late loading if CPUs are affected by BDF90 Chao Gao
2019-09-13  9:22   ` Jan Beulich
2019-09-17  9:01     ` Chao Gao
2019-09-17 10:49       ` Jan Beulich
2019-09-13 12:23   ` Andrew Cooper
2019-09-12  7:22 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v10 16/16] microcode/intel: writeback and invalidate cache conditionally Chao Gao
2019-09-13  9:32   ` Jan Beulich
2019-09-13  8:47 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v10 00/16] improve late microcode loading Jan Beulich
2019-09-17  7:09   ` Chao Gao
2019-09-17  7:11     ` Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1568272949-1086-9-git-send-email-chao.gao@intel.com \
    --to=chao.gao@intel.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=sergey.dyasli@citrix.com \
    --cc=wl@xen.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.