All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@linux.ibm.com>
To: mpe@ellerman.id.au
Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	tlfalcon@linux.ibm.com, nathanl@linux.ibm.com,
	bhelgaas@google.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/9] powerpc/pseries: Add cpu DLPAR support for drc-info property
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2019 23:21:30 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1573449697-5448-4-git-send-email-tyreld@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1573449697-5448-1-git-send-email-tyreld@linux.ibm.com>

Older firmwares provided information about Dynamic Reconfig
Connectors (DRC) through several device tree properties, namely
ibm,drc-types, ibm,drc-indexes, ibm,drc-names, and
ibm,drc-power-domains. New firmwares have the ability to present this
same information in a much condensed format through a device tree
property called ibm,drc-info.

The existing cpu DLPAR hotplug code only understands the older DRC
property format when validating the drc-index of a cpu during a
hotplug add. This updates those code paths to use the ibm,drc-info
property, when present, instead for validation.

Signed-off-by: Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@linux.ibm.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-cpu.c | 127 +++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 112 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-cpu.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-cpu.c
index bbda646..967c5e1 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-cpu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-cpu.c
@@ -407,17 +407,67 @@ static bool dlpar_cpu_exists(struct device_node *parent, u32 drc_index)
 	return found;
 }
 
+static bool drc_info_valid_index(struct device_node *parent, u32 drc_index)
+{
+	struct property *info;
+	struct of_drc_info drc;
+	const __be32 *value;
+	u32 index;
+	int count, i, j;
+
+	info = of_find_property(parent, "ibm,drc-info", NULL);
+	if (!info)
+		return false;
+
+	value = of_prop_next_u32(info, NULL, &count);
+
+	/* First value of ibm,drc-info is number of drc-info records */
+	if (value)
+		value++;
+	else
+		return false;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
+		if (of_read_drc_info_cell(&info, &value, &drc))
+			return false;
+
+		if (strncmp(drc.drc_type, "CPU", 3))
+			break;
+
+		if (drc_index > drc.last_drc_index)
+			continue;
+
+		index = drc.drc_index_start;
+		for (j = 0; j < drc.num_sequential_elems; j++) {
+			if (drc_index == index)
+				return true;
+
+			index += drc.sequential_inc;
+		}
+	}
+
+	return false;
+}
+
 static bool valid_cpu_drc_index(struct device_node *parent, u32 drc_index)
 {
 	bool found = false;
 	int rc, index;
 
-	index = 0;
+	if (of_find_property(parent, "ibm,drc-info", NULL))
+		return drc_info_valid_index(parent, drc_index);
+
+	/* Note that the format of the ibm,drc-indexes array is
+	 * the number of entries in the array followed by the array
+	 * of drc values so we start looking at index = 1.
+	 */
+	index = 1;
 	while (!found) {
 		u32 drc;
 
 		rc = of_property_read_u32_index(parent, "ibm,drc-indexes",
 						index++, &drc);
+
 		if (rc)
 			break;
 
@@ -717,19 +767,52 @@ static int dlpar_cpu_remove_by_count(u32 cpus_to_remove)
 	return rc;
 }
 
-static int find_dlpar_cpus_to_add(u32 *cpu_drcs, u32 cpus_to_add)
+static int find_drc_info_cpus_to_add(struct device_node *cpus,
+				     struct property *info,
+				     u32 *cpu_drcs, u32 cpus_to_add)
 {
-	struct device_node *parent;
+	struct of_drc_info drc;
+	const __be32 *value;
+	u32 count, drc_index;
 	int cpus_found = 0;
-	int index, rc;
+	int i, j;
 
-	parent = of_find_node_by_path("/cpus");
-	if (!parent) {
-		pr_warn("Could not find CPU root node in device tree\n");
-		kfree(cpu_drcs);
+	if (!info)
 		return -1;
+
+	value = of_prop_next_u32(info, NULL, &count);
+	if (value)
+		value++;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
+		of_read_drc_info_cell(&info, &value, &drc);
+		if (strncmp(drc.drc_type, "CPU", 3))
+			break;
+
+		drc_index = drc.drc_index_start;
+		for (j = 0; j < drc.num_sequential_elems; j++) {
+			if (dlpar_cpu_exists(cpus, drc_index))
+				continue;
+
+			cpu_drcs[cpus_found++] = drc_index;
+
+			if (cpus_found == cpus_to_add)
+				return cpus_found;
+
+			drc_index += drc.sequential_inc;
+		}
 	}
 
+	return cpus_found;
+}
+
+static int find_drc_index_cpus_to_add(struct device_node *cpus,
+				      u32 *cpu_drcs, u32 cpus_to_add)
+{
+	int cpus_found = 0;
+	int index, rc;
+	u32 drc_index;
+
 	/* Search the ibm,drc-indexes array for possible CPU drcs to
 	 * add. Note that the format of the ibm,drc-indexes array is
 	 * the number of entries in the array followed by the array
@@ -737,25 +820,25 @@ static int find_dlpar_cpus_to_add(u32 *cpu_drcs, u32 cpus_to_add)
 	 */
 	index = 1;
 	while (cpus_found < cpus_to_add) {
-		u32 drc;
+		rc = of_property_read_u32_index(cpus, "ibm,drc-indexes",
+						index++, &drc_index);
 
-		rc = of_property_read_u32_index(parent, "ibm,drc-indexes",
-						index++, &drc);
 		if (rc)
 			break;
 
-		if (dlpar_cpu_exists(parent, drc))
+		if (dlpar_cpu_exists(cpus, drc_index))
 			continue;
 
-		cpu_drcs[cpus_found++] = drc;
+		cpu_drcs[cpus_found++] = drc_index;
 	}
 
-	of_node_put(parent);
 	return cpus_found;
 }
 
 static int dlpar_cpu_add_by_count(u32 cpus_to_add)
 {
+	struct device_node *parent;
+	struct property *info;
 	u32 *cpu_drcs;
 	int cpus_added = 0;
 	int cpus_found;
@@ -767,7 +850,21 @@ static int dlpar_cpu_add_by_count(u32 cpus_to_add)
 	if (!cpu_drcs)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	cpus_found = find_dlpar_cpus_to_add(cpu_drcs, cpus_to_add);
+	parent = of_find_node_by_path("/cpus");
+	if (!parent) {
+		pr_warn("Could not find CPU root node in device tree\n");
+		kfree(cpu_drcs);
+		return -1;
+	}
+
+	info = of_find_property(parent, "ibm,drc-info", NULL);
+	if (info)
+		cpus_found = find_drc_info_cpus_to_add(parent, info, cpu_drcs, cpus_to_add);
+	else
+		cpus_found = find_drc_index_cpus_to_add(parent, cpu_drcs, cpus_to_add);
+
+	of_node_put(parent);
+
 	if (cpus_found < cpus_to_add) {
 		pr_warn("Failed to find enough CPUs (%d of %d) to add\n",
 			cpus_found, cpus_to_add);
-- 
2.7.4


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@linux.ibm.com>
To: mpe@ellerman.id.au
Cc: nathanl@linux.ibm.com, Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@linux.ibm.com>,
	tlfalcon@linux.ibm.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	bhelgaas@google.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/9] powerpc/pseries: Add cpu DLPAR support for drc-info property
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2019 23:21:30 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1573449697-5448-4-git-send-email-tyreld@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1573449697-5448-1-git-send-email-tyreld@linux.ibm.com>

Older firmwares provided information about Dynamic Reconfig
Connectors (DRC) through several device tree properties, namely
ibm,drc-types, ibm,drc-indexes, ibm,drc-names, and
ibm,drc-power-domains. New firmwares have the ability to present this
same information in a much condensed format through a device tree
property called ibm,drc-info.

The existing cpu DLPAR hotplug code only understands the older DRC
property format when validating the drc-index of a cpu during a
hotplug add. This updates those code paths to use the ibm,drc-info
property, when present, instead for validation.

Signed-off-by: Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@linux.ibm.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-cpu.c | 127 +++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 112 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-cpu.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-cpu.c
index bbda646..967c5e1 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-cpu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-cpu.c
@@ -407,17 +407,67 @@ static bool dlpar_cpu_exists(struct device_node *parent, u32 drc_index)
 	return found;
 }
 
+static bool drc_info_valid_index(struct device_node *parent, u32 drc_index)
+{
+	struct property *info;
+	struct of_drc_info drc;
+	const __be32 *value;
+	u32 index;
+	int count, i, j;
+
+	info = of_find_property(parent, "ibm,drc-info", NULL);
+	if (!info)
+		return false;
+
+	value = of_prop_next_u32(info, NULL, &count);
+
+	/* First value of ibm,drc-info is number of drc-info records */
+	if (value)
+		value++;
+	else
+		return false;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
+		if (of_read_drc_info_cell(&info, &value, &drc))
+			return false;
+
+		if (strncmp(drc.drc_type, "CPU", 3))
+			break;
+
+		if (drc_index > drc.last_drc_index)
+			continue;
+
+		index = drc.drc_index_start;
+		for (j = 0; j < drc.num_sequential_elems; j++) {
+			if (drc_index == index)
+				return true;
+
+			index += drc.sequential_inc;
+		}
+	}
+
+	return false;
+}
+
 static bool valid_cpu_drc_index(struct device_node *parent, u32 drc_index)
 {
 	bool found = false;
 	int rc, index;
 
-	index = 0;
+	if (of_find_property(parent, "ibm,drc-info", NULL))
+		return drc_info_valid_index(parent, drc_index);
+
+	/* Note that the format of the ibm,drc-indexes array is
+	 * the number of entries in the array followed by the array
+	 * of drc values so we start looking at index = 1.
+	 */
+	index = 1;
 	while (!found) {
 		u32 drc;
 
 		rc = of_property_read_u32_index(parent, "ibm,drc-indexes",
 						index++, &drc);
+
 		if (rc)
 			break;
 
@@ -717,19 +767,52 @@ static int dlpar_cpu_remove_by_count(u32 cpus_to_remove)
 	return rc;
 }
 
-static int find_dlpar_cpus_to_add(u32 *cpu_drcs, u32 cpus_to_add)
+static int find_drc_info_cpus_to_add(struct device_node *cpus,
+				     struct property *info,
+				     u32 *cpu_drcs, u32 cpus_to_add)
 {
-	struct device_node *parent;
+	struct of_drc_info drc;
+	const __be32 *value;
+	u32 count, drc_index;
 	int cpus_found = 0;
-	int index, rc;
+	int i, j;
 
-	parent = of_find_node_by_path("/cpus");
-	if (!parent) {
-		pr_warn("Could not find CPU root node in device tree\n");
-		kfree(cpu_drcs);
+	if (!info)
 		return -1;
+
+	value = of_prop_next_u32(info, NULL, &count);
+	if (value)
+		value++;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
+		of_read_drc_info_cell(&info, &value, &drc);
+		if (strncmp(drc.drc_type, "CPU", 3))
+			break;
+
+		drc_index = drc.drc_index_start;
+		for (j = 0; j < drc.num_sequential_elems; j++) {
+			if (dlpar_cpu_exists(cpus, drc_index))
+				continue;
+
+			cpu_drcs[cpus_found++] = drc_index;
+
+			if (cpus_found == cpus_to_add)
+				return cpus_found;
+
+			drc_index += drc.sequential_inc;
+		}
 	}
 
+	return cpus_found;
+}
+
+static int find_drc_index_cpus_to_add(struct device_node *cpus,
+				      u32 *cpu_drcs, u32 cpus_to_add)
+{
+	int cpus_found = 0;
+	int index, rc;
+	u32 drc_index;
+
 	/* Search the ibm,drc-indexes array for possible CPU drcs to
 	 * add. Note that the format of the ibm,drc-indexes array is
 	 * the number of entries in the array followed by the array
@@ -737,25 +820,25 @@ static int find_dlpar_cpus_to_add(u32 *cpu_drcs, u32 cpus_to_add)
 	 */
 	index = 1;
 	while (cpus_found < cpus_to_add) {
-		u32 drc;
+		rc = of_property_read_u32_index(cpus, "ibm,drc-indexes",
+						index++, &drc_index);
 
-		rc = of_property_read_u32_index(parent, "ibm,drc-indexes",
-						index++, &drc);
 		if (rc)
 			break;
 
-		if (dlpar_cpu_exists(parent, drc))
+		if (dlpar_cpu_exists(cpus, drc_index))
 			continue;
 
-		cpu_drcs[cpus_found++] = drc;
+		cpu_drcs[cpus_found++] = drc_index;
 	}
 
-	of_node_put(parent);
 	return cpus_found;
 }
 
 static int dlpar_cpu_add_by_count(u32 cpus_to_add)
 {
+	struct device_node *parent;
+	struct property *info;
 	u32 *cpu_drcs;
 	int cpus_added = 0;
 	int cpus_found;
@@ -767,7 +850,21 @@ static int dlpar_cpu_add_by_count(u32 cpus_to_add)
 	if (!cpu_drcs)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	cpus_found = find_dlpar_cpus_to_add(cpu_drcs, cpus_to_add);
+	parent = of_find_node_by_path("/cpus");
+	if (!parent) {
+		pr_warn("Could not find CPU root node in device tree\n");
+		kfree(cpu_drcs);
+		return -1;
+	}
+
+	info = of_find_property(parent, "ibm,drc-info", NULL);
+	if (info)
+		cpus_found = find_drc_info_cpus_to_add(parent, info, cpu_drcs, cpus_to_add);
+	else
+		cpus_found = find_drc_index_cpus_to_add(parent, cpu_drcs, cpus_to_add);
+
+	of_node_put(parent);
+
 	if (cpus_found < cpus_to_add) {
 		pr_warn("Failed to find enough CPUs (%d of %d) to add\n",
 			cpus_found, cpus_to_add);
-- 
2.7.4


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-11-11  5:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-11  5:21 [PATCH v2 0/9] Fixes and Enablement of ibm,drc-info property Tyrel Datwyler
2019-11-11  5:21 ` Tyrel Datwyler
2019-11-11  5:21 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] powerpc/pseries: Fix bad drc_index_start value parsing of drc-info entry Tyrel Datwyler
2019-11-11  5:21   ` Tyrel Datwyler
2019-11-14  9:08   ` Michael Ellerman
2019-11-14  9:08     ` Michael Ellerman
2019-11-11  5:21 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] powerpc/pseries: Fix drc-info mappings of logical cpus to drc-index Tyrel Datwyler
2019-11-11  5:21   ` Tyrel Datwyler
2019-11-11  5:21 ` Tyrel Datwyler [this message]
2019-11-11  5:21   ` [PATCH v2 3/9] powerpc/pseries: Add cpu DLPAR support for drc-info property Tyrel Datwyler
2019-11-11  5:21 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] PCI: rpaphp: Fix up pointer to first drc-info entry Tyrel Datwyler
2019-11-11  5:21   ` Tyrel Datwyler
2019-11-11  5:21 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] PCI: rpaphp: Don't rely on firmware feature to imply drc-info support Tyrel Datwyler
2019-11-11  5:21   ` Tyrel Datwyler
2019-11-11  5:21 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] PCI: rpaphp: Add drc-info support for hotplug slot registration Tyrel Datwyler
2019-11-11  5:21   ` Tyrel Datwyler
2019-11-11  5:21 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] PCI: rpaphp: annotate and correctly byte swap DRC properties Tyrel Datwyler
2019-11-11  5:21   ` Tyrel Datwyler
2019-11-11  5:21 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] PCI: rpaphp: Annotate " Tyrel Datwyler
2019-11-11  5:21   ` Tyrel Datwyler
2019-11-11  5:21 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] PCI: rpaphp: Correctly match ibm,my-drc-index to drc-name when using drc-info Tyrel Datwyler
2019-11-11  5:21   ` [PATCH v2 8/9] PCI: rpaphp: Correctly match ibm, my-drc-index " Tyrel Datwyler
2019-11-11  5:21 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] powerpc/pseries: Enable support for ibm,drc-info property Tyrel Datwyler
2019-11-11  5:21   ` [PATCH v2 9/9] powerpc/pseries: Enable support for ibm, drc-info property Tyrel Datwyler
2019-11-11 19:49 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] Fixes and Enablement of ibm,drc-info property Bjorn Helgaas
2019-11-11 19:49   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-11-12 10:50   ` Michael Ellerman
2019-11-12 10:50     ` Michael Ellerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1573449697-5448-4-git-send-email-tyreld@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=tyreld@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=nathanl@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tlfalcon@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.