From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: james.quinlan@broadcom.com, Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com,
lukasz.luba@arm.com, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: Use HAVE_ARM_SMCCC_DISCOVERY instead of ARM_PSCI_FW
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2020 15:49:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <159378750699.7612.3747943343943399740.b4-ty@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <159378754443.7674.9124886575137501969.b4-ty@arm.com>
In-Reply-To: <20200625101937.51939-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com>
On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 11:19:37 +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> Commit e5bfb21d98b6 ("firmware: smccc: Add HAVE_ARM_SMCCC_DISCOVERY to
> identify SMCCC v1.1 and above") introduced new config option to identify
> the availability of SMCCC discoverability of version and features
> transparently hiding the indirect dependency on ARM_PSCI_FW.
>
> Commit 5a897e3ab429 ("firmware: arm_scmi: fix psci dependency") just
> worked around the build dependency making SCMI SMC/HVC transport depend
> on ARM_PSCI_FW at the time. Since it really just relies on SMCCC directly
> and not on ARM_PSCI_FW, let us move to use CONFIG_HAVE_ARM_SMCCC_DISCOVERY
> instead of CONFIG_ARM_PSCI_FW.
Applied to sudeep.holla/linux (for-next/scmi), thanks!
[1/1] firmware: arm_scmi: Use HAVE_ARM_SMCCC_DISCOVERY instead of ARM_PSCI_FW
https://git.kernel.org/sudeep.holla/c/d764282377
--
Regards,
Sudeep
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
lukasz.luba@arm.com, james.quinlan@broadcom.com,
Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: Use HAVE_ARM_SMCCC_DISCOVERY instead of ARM_PSCI_FW
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2020 15:49:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <159378750699.7612.3747943343943399740.b4-ty@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <159378754443.7674.9124886575137501969.b4-ty@arm.com>
In-Reply-To: <20200625101937.51939-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com>
On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 11:19:37 +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> Commit e5bfb21d98b6 ("firmware: smccc: Add HAVE_ARM_SMCCC_DISCOVERY to
> identify SMCCC v1.1 and above") introduced new config option to identify
> the availability of SMCCC discoverability of version and features
> transparently hiding the indirect dependency on ARM_PSCI_FW.
>
> Commit 5a897e3ab429 ("firmware: arm_scmi: fix psci dependency") just
> worked around the build dependency making SCMI SMC/HVC transport depend
> on ARM_PSCI_FW at the time. Since it really just relies on SMCCC directly
> and not on ARM_PSCI_FW, let us move to use CONFIG_HAVE_ARM_SMCCC_DISCOVERY
> instead of CONFIG_ARM_PSCI_FW.
Applied to sudeep.holla/linux (for-next/scmi), thanks!
[1/1] firmware: arm_scmi: Use HAVE_ARM_SMCCC_DISCOVERY instead of ARM_PSCI_FW
https://git.kernel.org/sudeep.holla/c/d764282377
--
Regards,
Sudeep
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-03 14:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-19 22:03 [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: Fix SCMI Generic Power Domain probing Cristian Marussi
2020-06-19 22:03 ` Cristian Marussi
2020-07-03 14:49 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-07-03 14:49 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-07-01 15:53 ` [PATCH v11 0/9] SCMI Notifications Core Support Cristian Marussi
2020-07-01 15:53 ` Cristian Marussi
2020-07-01 15:53 ` [PATCH v11 1/9] firmware: arm_scmi: Add notification protocol-registration Cristian Marussi
2020-07-01 15:53 ` Cristian Marussi
2020-07-01 15:53 ` [PATCH v11 2/9] firmware: arm_scmi: Add notification callbacks-registration Cristian Marussi
2020-07-01 15:53 ` Cristian Marussi
2020-07-01 15:53 ` [PATCH v11 3/9] firmware: arm_scmi: Add notification dispatch and delivery Cristian Marussi
2020-07-01 15:53 ` Cristian Marussi
2020-07-01 15:53 ` [PATCH v11 4/9] firmware: arm_scmi: Enable notification core Cristian Marussi
2020-07-01 15:53 ` Cristian Marussi
2020-07-01 15:53 ` [PATCH v11 5/9] firmware: arm_scmi: Add power notifications support Cristian Marussi
2020-07-01 15:53 ` Cristian Marussi
2020-07-01 15:53 ` [PATCH v11 6/9] firmware: arm_scmi: Add perf " Cristian Marussi
2020-07-01 15:53 ` Cristian Marussi
2020-07-01 15:53 ` [PATCH v11 7/9] firmware: arm_scmi: Add sensor " Cristian Marussi
2020-07-01 15:53 ` Cristian Marussi
2020-07-01 15:53 ` [PATCH v11 8/9] firmware: arm_scmi: Add reset " Cristian Marussi
2020-07-01 15:53 ` Cristian Marussi
2020-07-01 15:53 ` [PATCH v11 9/9] firmware: arm_scmi: Add base " Cristian Marussi
2020-07-01 15:53 ` Cristian Marussi
2020-07-03 14:49 ` [PATCH v11 0/9] SCMI Notifications Core Support Sudeep Holla
2020-07-03 14:49 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-06-17 9:43 ` [PATCH 1/2] firmware: arm_scmi: Add fast_switch_possible() api Nicola Mazzucato
2020-06-17 9:43 ` Nicola Mazzucato
2020-06-17 9:43 ` [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: arm_scmi: Set fast_switch_possible conditionally Nicola Mazzucato
2020-06-17 9:43 ` Nicola Mazzucato
2020-06-17 12:47 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-06-17 12:47 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-06-18 6:14 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-06-18 6:14 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-06-18 8:08 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-06-18 8:08 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-06-18 9:54 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-06-18 9:54 ` Viresh Kumar
2020-07-03 14:49 ` [PATCH 1/2] firmware: arm_scmi: Add fast_switch_possible() api Sudeep Holla
2020-07-03 14:49 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-06-25 10:19 ` [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: Use HAVE_ARM_SMCCC_DISCOVERY instead of ARM_PSCI_FW Sudeep Holla
2020-06-25 10:19 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-07-03 14:49 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2020-07-03 14:49 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-06-09 13:45 ` [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: Use signed integer to report transfer status Sudeep Holla
2020-06-09 13:45 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-06-09 14:00 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-06-09 14:00 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-07-03 14:49 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-07-03 14:49 ` Sudeep Holla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=159378750699.7612.3747943343943399740.b4-ty@arm.com \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
--cc=james.quinlan@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
--cc=peng.fan@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.