All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
To: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org>,
	Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add device tree node for LLCC
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 10:45:42 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <161436514295.1254594.2789904935200051795@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a35e6dcba758be4af3d111fe92cfbcd6@codeaurora.org>

Quoting Sai Prakash Ranjan (2021-02-26 00:04:27)
> On 2021-02-26 01:07, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Sai Prakash Ranjan (2021-02-25 01:30:19)
> >> Add a DT node for Last level cache (aka. system cache)
> >> controller which provides control over the last level
> >> cache present on SC7280 SoC.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
> >> ---
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
> > 
> > Should add system-cache-controller to the devicetree spec. Or just use
> > cache-controller for the node name.
> 
> This was as per discussion in [1][2] where dt-schema throws an error
> since it expects cache-level to be associated with cache-controller.
> 

Ah right. Can you add system-cache-controller to the dt spec?

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
To: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
	Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add device tree node for LLCC
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 10:45:42 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <161436514295.1254594.2789904935200051795@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a35e6dcba758be4af3d111fe92cfbcd6@codeaurora.org>

Quoting Sai Prakash Ranjan (2021-02-26 00:04:27)
> On 2021-02-26 01:07, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Sai Prakash Ranjan (2021-02-25 01:30:19)
> >> Add a DT node for Last level cache (aka. system cache)
> >> controller which provides control over the last level
> >> cache present on SC7280 SoC.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
> >> ---
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
> > 
> > Should add system-cache-controller to the devicetree spec. Or just use
> > cache-controller for the node name.
> 
> This was as per discussion in [1][2] where dt-schema throws an error
> since it expects cache-level to be associated with cache-controller.
> 

Ah right. Can you add system-cache-controller to the dt spec?

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-26 18:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-25  9:30 [PATCH 0/9] qcom/sc7280: Enable various hardware blocks on SC7280 SoC Sai Prakash Ranjan
2021-02-25  9:30 ` [PATCH 1/9] dt-bindings: arm: msm: Add LLCC for SC7280 Sai Prakash Ranjan
2021-02-25 19:35   ` Stephen Boyd
2021-02-25 19:35     ` Stephen Boyd
2021-03-06 20:47   ` Rob Herring
2021-03-06 20:47     ` Rob Herring
2021-02-25  9:30 ` [PATCH 2/9] soc: qcom: llcc: Add configuration data " Sai Prakash Ranjan
2021-02-25  9:30 ` [PATCH 3/9] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add device tree node for LLCC Sai Prakash Ranjan
2021-02-25 19:37   ` Stephen Boyd
2021-02-25 19:37     ` Stephen Boyd
2021-02-26  8:04     ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2021-02-26 18:45       ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2021-02-26 18:45         ` Stephen Boyd
2021-02-27 13:58         ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2021-03-01  4:21           ` Stephen Boyd
2021-03-01  4:21             ` Stephen Boyd
2021-02-25  9:30 ` [PATCH 4/9] dt-bindings: mailbox: qcom-ipcc: Add compatible for SC7280 Sai Prakash Ranjan
2021-02-25 14:13   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-02-25 14:13     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-02-25 19:38   ` Stephen Boyd
2021-02-25 19:38     ` Stephen Boyd
2021-02-25  9:30 ` [PATCH 5/9] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add IPCC for SC7280 SoC Sai Prakash Ranjan
2021-02-25 14:12   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-02-25 14:12     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-02-25 19:38   ` Stephen Boyd
2021-02-25 19:38     ` Stephen Boyd
2021-02-25  9:30 ` [PATCH 6/9] dt-bindings: soc: qcom: aoss: Add SC7280 compatible Sai Prakash Ranjan
2021-02-25 19:40   ` Stephen Boyd
2021-02-25 19:40     ` Stephen Boyd
2021-03-06 20:53   ` Rob Herring
2021-03-06 20:53     ` Rob Herring
2021-02-25  9:30 ` [PATCH 7/9] soc: qcom: aoss: Add AOSS QMP support for SC7280 Sai Prakash Ranjan
2021-02-25 19:40   ` Stephen Boyd
2021-02-25 19:40     ` Stephen Boyd
2021-02-25  9:30 ` [PATCH 8/9] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add AOSS QMP node Sai Prakash Ranjan
2021-02-25 19:41   ` Stephen Boyd
2021-02-25 19:41     ` Stephen Boyd
2021-02-26  7:51     ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2021-02-26 18:46       ` Stephen Boyd
2021-02-26 18:46         ` Stephen Boyd
2021-02-27 13:56         ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2021-03-09  5:58           ` Sibi Sankar
2021-03-23  3:38             ` Stephen Boyd
2021-03-23  3:38               ` Stephen Boyd
2021-03-24  7:05               ` Sibi Sankar
2021-02-25  9:30 ` [PATCH 9/9] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add Coresight support Sai Prakash Ranjan
2021-03-11 23:14 ` [PATCH 0/9] qcom/sc7280: Enable various hardware blocks on SC7280 SoC Bjorn Andersson
2021-03-11 23:14   ` Bjorn Andersson
2021-03-14 19:05   ` Sai Prakash Ranjan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=161436514295.1254594.2789904935200051795@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com \
    --to=swboyd@chromium.org \
    --cc=agross@kernel.org \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rnayak@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=sibis@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.