From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-api <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>, Dave Watson <davejwatson@fb.com>, Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, Chris Lameter <cl@linux.com>, Ben Maurer <bmaurer@fb.com>, rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>, Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>, Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH for 5.1 0/3] Restartable Sequences updates for 5.1 Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 08:42:08 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview] Message-ID: <161476507.73.1555677728159.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20190419104123.GB111210@gmail.com> ----- On Apr 19, 2019, at 6:41 AM, Ingo Molnar mingo@kernel.org wrote: > * Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> wrote: > >> Those changes aiming at 5.1 include one comment cleanup, the removal of >> the rseq_len field from the task struct which serves no purpose >> considering that the struct size is fixed by the ABI, and a selftest >> improvement adapting the number of threads to the number of detected >> CPUs, which is nicer for smaller systems. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Mathieu >> >> Mathieu Desnoyers (3): >> rseq: cleanup: Reflect removal of event counter in comments >> rseq: cleanup: remove rseq_len from task_struct >> rseq/selftests: Adapt number of threads to the number of detected cpus >> >> arch/arm/kernel/signal.c | 3 +-- >> arch/x86/kernel/signal.c | 5 +---- >> include/linux/sched.h | 4 ---- >> kernel/rseq.c | 9 +++------ >> tools/testing/selftests/rseq/run_param_test.sh | 7 +++++-- >> 5 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > Looks good, I've applied these to tip:core/rseq to make sure they don't > miss the v5.2 merge window. > > (Let me know if you wanted to handle this differently.) That's fine by me! Thanks, Mathieu > > Thanks, > > Ingo -- Mathieu Desnoyers EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-api <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>, Dave Watson <davejwatson@fb.com>, Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, Chris Lameter <cl@linux.com>, Ben Maurer <bmaurer@fb.com>, rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>, Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Will Subject: Re: [PATCH for 5.1 0/3] Restartable Sequences updates for 5.1 Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 08:42:08 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview] Message-ID: <161476507.73.1555677728159.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20190419104123.GB111210@gmail.com> ----- On Apr 19, 2019, at 6:41 AM, Ingo Molnar mingo@kernel.org wrote: > * Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> wrote: > >> Those changes aiming at 5.1 include one comment cleanup, the removal of >> the rseq_len field from the task struct which serves no purpose >> considering that the struct size is fixed by the ABI, and a selftest >> improvement adapting the number of threads to the number of detected >> CPUs, which is nicer for smaller systems. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Mathieu >> >> Mathieu Desnoyers (3): >> rseq: cleanup: Reflect removal of event counter in comments >> rseq: cleanup: remove rseq_len from task_struct >> rseq/selftests: Adapt number of threads to the number of detected cpus >> >> arch/arm/kernel/signal.c | 3 +-- >> arch/x86/kernel/signal.c | 5 +---- >> include/linux/sched.h | 4 ---- >> kernel/rseq.c | 9 +++------ >> tools/testing/selftests/rseq/run_param_test.sh | 7 +++++-- >> 5 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > Looks good, I've applied these to tip:core/rseq to make sure they don't > miss the v5.2 merge window. > > (Let me know if you wanted to handle this differently.) That's fine by me! Thanks, Mathieu > > Thanks, > > Ingo -- Mathieu Desnoyers EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-19 18:40 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-03-05 19:47 [PATCH for 5.1 0/3] Restartable Sequences updates for 5.1 Mathieu Desnoyers 2019-03-05 19:47 ` Mathieu Desnoyers 2019-03-05 19:47 ` [PATCH for 5.1 1/3] rseq: cleanup: Reflect removal of event counter in comments Mathieu Desnoyers 2019-03-05 19:47 ` Mathieu Desnoyers 2019-04-19 10:43 ` [tip:core/rseq] rseq: Clean up comments by reflecting removal of event counter tip-bot for Mathieu Desnoyers 2019-03-05 19:47 ` [PATCH for 5.1 2/3] rseq: cleanup: remove rseq_len from task_struct Mathieu Desnoyers 2019-03-05 19:47 ` Mathieu Desnoyers 2019-04-19 10:43 ` [tip:core/rseq] rseq: Remove superfluous " tip-bot for Mathieu Desnoyers 2019-03-05 19:47 ` [PATCH for 5.1 3/3] rseq/selftests: Adapt number of threads to the number of detected cpus Mathieu Desnoyers 2019-03-05 19:47 ` Mathieu Desnoyers 2019-03-05 19:47 ` Mathieu Desnoyers 2019-03-05 19:47 ` mathieu.desnoyers 2019-04-19 10:38 ` Ingo Molnar 2019-04-19 10:38 ` Ingo Molnar 2019-04-19 10:38 ` Ingo Molnar 2019-04-19 10:38 ` mingo 2019-04-19 12:41 ` Mathieu Desnoyers 2019-04-19 12:41 ` Mathieu Desnoyers 2019-04-19 12:41 ` Mathieu Desnoyers 2019-04-19 12:41 ` mathieu.desnoyers 2019-04-19 12:55 ` Mathieu Desnoyers 2019-04-19 12:55 ` Mathieu Desnoyers 2019-04-19 12:55 ` Mathieu Desnoyers 2019-04-19 12:55 ` mathieu.desnoyers 2019-04-19 13:42 ` Mathieu Desnoyers 2019-04-19 13:42 ` Mathieu Desnoyers 2019-04-19 13:42 ` Mathieu Desnoyers 2019-04-19 13:42 ` mathieu.desnoyers 2019-04-19 13:48 ` Mathieu Desnoyers 2019-04-19 13:48 ` Mathieu Desnoyers 2019-04-19 13:48 ` Mathieu Desnoyers 2019-04-19 13:48 ` mathieu.desnoyers 2019-04-19 14:17 ` shuah 2019-04-19 14:17 ` shuah 2019-04-19 14:17 ` shuah 2019-04-19 14:17 ` shuah 2019-04-19 14:40 ` Mathieu Desnoyers 2019-04-19 14:40 ` Mathieu Desnoyers 2019-04-19 14:40 ` Mathieu Desnoyers 2019-04-19 14:40 ` mathieu.desnoyers 2019-04-19 18:57 ` shuah 2019-04-19 18:57 ` shuah 2019-04-19 18:57 ` shuah 2019-04-19 18:57 ` shuah 2019-04-19 20:59 ` Mathieu Desnoyers 2019-04-19 20:59 ` Mathieu Desnoyers 2019-04-19 20:59 ` Mathieu Desnoyers 2019-04-19 20:59 ` mathieu.desnoyers 2019-04-19 21:03 ` shuah 2019-04-19 21:03 ` shuah 2019-04-19 21:03 ` shuah 2019-04-19 21:03 ` shuah 2019-04-19 10:44 ` [tip:core/rseq] " tip-bot for Mathieu Desnoyers 2019-04-19 10:46 ` [tip:core/rseq] rseq/selftests: Adapt number of threads to the number of detected CPUs tip-bot for Mathieu Desnoyers 2019-03-05 20:18 ` [PATCH for 5.1 0/3] Restartable Sequences updates for 5.1 Mathieu Desnoyers 2019-03-05 20:18 ` Mathieu Desnoyers 2019-03-05 21:58 ` Peter Zijlstra 2019-03-05 21:58 ` Peter Zijlstra 2019-03-05 22:32 ` Mathieu Desnoyers 2019-03-05 22:32 ` Mathieu Desnoyers 2019-03-06 8:21 ` Peter Zijlstra 2019-03-06 8:21 ` Peter Zijlstra 2019-03-06 8:30 ` Peter Zijlstra 2019-03-06 8:30 ` Peter Zijlstra 2019-03-06 17:00 ` Mathieu Desnoyers 2019-03-06 17:00 ` Mathieu Desnoyers 2019-03-05 21:49 ` Peter Zijlstra 2019-03-05 21:49 ` Peter Zijlstra 2019-04-19 10:41 ` Ingo Molnar 2019-04-19 10:41 ` Ingo Molnar 2019-04-19 12:42 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message] 2019-04-19 12:42 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=161476507.73.1555677728159.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com \ --to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \ --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \ --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \ --cc=bmaurer@fb.com \ --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \ --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \ --cc=cl@linux.com \ --cc=davejwatson@fb.com \ --cc=hpa@zytor.com \ --cc=joelaf@google.com \ --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \ --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \ --cc=luto@amacapital.net \ --cc=mingo@kernel.org \ --cc=mingo@redhat.com \ --cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \ --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \ --cc=peterz@infradead.org \ --cc=pjt@google.com \ --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \ --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \ --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \ --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.