All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nina Wu <nina-cm.wu@mediatek.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Cc: Nina Wu <Nina-CM.Wu@mediatek.com>,
	Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>,
	Neal Liu <neal.liu@mediatek.com>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	<srv_heupstream@mediatek.com>, <Jackson-kt.Chang@mediatek.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/7] soc: mediatek: devapc: get 'vio_idx_num' info from DT
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2021 16:19:32 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1617956377-4075-2-git-send-email-nina-cm.wu@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1617956377-4075-1-git-send-email-nina-cm.wu@mediatek.com>

From: Nina Wu <Nina-CM.Wu@mediatek.com>

For new ICs, there are multiple devapc HWs for different subsys.
The number of devices controlled by each devapc (i.e. 'vio_idx_num')
will be set in DT for per devapc node.
On the other hand, for old ICs which have only one devapc HW, the
'vio_idx_num' info is set in compatible data.
To be backward compatible, the 'vio_idx_num' in compatible data is set
as the default value. Only when the default value is 0 will we get the
'vio_idx_num' from DT.

Signed-off-by: Nina Wu <Nina-CM.Wu@mediatek.com>
---
 drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-devapc.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-devapc.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-devapc.c
index f1cea04..71643d1 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-devapc.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-devapc.c
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ struct mtk_devapc_vio_dbgs {
 };
 
 struct mtk_devapc_data {
-	/* numbers of violation index */
+	/* default numbers of violation index */
 	u32 vio_idx_num;
 
 	/* reg offset */
@@ -51,6 +51,9 @@ struct mtk_devapc_context {
 	void __iomem *infra_base;
 	struct clk *infra_clk;
 	const struct mtk_devapc_data *data;
+
+	/* numbers of violation index */
+	u32 vio_idx_num;
 };
 
 static void clear_vio_status(struct mtk_devapc_context *ctx)
@@ -60,10 +63,10 @@ static void clear_vio_status(struct mtk_devapc_context *ctx)
 
 	reg = ctx->infra_base + ctx->data->vio_sta_offset;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < VIO_MOD_TO_REG_IND(ctx->data->vio_idx_num) - 1; i++)
+	for (i = 0; i < VIO_MOD_TO_REG_IND(ctx->vio_idx_num) - 1; i++)
 		writel(GENMASK(31, 0), reg + 4 * i);
 
-	writel(GENMASK(VIO_MOD_TO_REG_OFF(ctx->data->vio_idx_num) - 1, 0),
+	writel(GENMASK(VIO_MOD_TO_REG_OFF(ctx->vio_idx_num) - 1, 0),
 	       reg + 4 * i);
 }
 
@@ -80,15 +83,15 @@ static void mask_module_irq(struct mtk_devapc_context *ctx, bool mask)
 	else
 		val = 0;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < VIO_MOD_TO_REG_IND(ctx->data->vio_idx_num) - 1; i++)
+	for (i = 0; i < VIO_MOD_TO_REG_IND(ctx->vio_idx_num) - 1; i++)
 		writel(val, reg + 4 * i);
 
 	val = readl(reg + 4 * i);
 	if (mask)
-		val |= GENMASK(VIO_MOD_TO_REG_OFF(ctx->data->vio_idx_num) - 1,
+		val |= GENMASK(VIO_MOD_TO_REG_OFF(ctx->vio_idx_num) - 1,
 			       0);
 	else
-		val &= ~GENMASK(VIO_MOD_TO_REG_OFF(ctx->data->vio_idx_num) - 1,
+		val &= ~GENMASK(VIO_MOD_TO_REG_OFF(ctx->vio_idx_num) - 1,
 				0);
 
 	writel(val, reg + 4 * i);
@@ -256,6 +259,16 @@ static int mtk_devapc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (!ctx->infra_base)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	/* Set vio_idx_num to default value.
+	 * If the value is 0, get the info from DT.
+	 */
+	ctx->vio_idx_num = ctx->data->vio_idx_num;
+	if (!ctx->vio_idx_num)
+		if (of_property_read_u32(node,
+					 "vio-idx-num",
+					 &ctx->vio_idx_num))
+			return -EINVAL;
+
 	devapc_irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(node, 0);
 	if (!devapc_irq)
 		return -EINVAL;
-- 
2.6.4


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nina Wu <nina-cm.wu@mediatek.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Cc: Nina Wu <Nina-CM.Wu@mediatek.com>,
	Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>,
	 Neal Liu <neal.liu@mediatek.com>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	<srv_heupstream@mediatek.com>, <Jackson-kt.Chang@mediatek.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/7] soc: mediatek: devapc: get 'vio_idx_num' info from DT
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2021 16:19:32 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1617956377-4075-2-git-send-email-nina-cm.wu@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1617956377-4075-1-git-send-email-nina-cm.wu@mediatek.com>

From: Nina Wu <Nina-CM.Wu@mediatek.com>

For new ICs, there are multiple devapc HWs for different subsys.
The number of devices controlled by each devapc (i.e. 'vio_idx_num')
will be set in DT for per devapc node.
On the other hand, for old ICs which have only one devapc HW, the
'vio_idx_num' info is set in compatible data.
To be backward compatible, the 'vio_idx_num' in compatible data is set
as the default value. Only when the default value is 0 will we get the
'vio_idx_num' from DT.

Signed-off-by: Nina Wu <Nina-CM.Wu@mediatek.com>
---
 drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-devapc.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-devapc.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-devapc.c
index f1cea04..71643d1 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-devapc.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-devapc.c
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ struct mtk_devapc_vio_dbgs {
 };
 
 struct mtk_devapc_data {
-	/* numbers of violation index */
+	/* default numbers of violation index */
 	u32 vio_idx_num;
 
 	/* reg offset */
@@ -51,6 +51,9 @@ struct mtk_devapc_context {
 	void __iomem *infra_base;
 	struct clk *infra_clk;
 	const struct mtk_devapc_data *data;
+
+	/* numbers of violation index */
+	u32 vio_idx_num;
 };
 
 static void clear_vio_status(struct mtk_devapc_context *ctx)
@@ -60,10 +63,10 @@ static void clear_vio_status(struct mtk_devapc_context *ctx)
 
 	reg = ctx->infra_base + ctx->data->vio_sta_offset;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < VIO_MOD_TO_REG_IND(ctx->data->vio_idx_num) - 1; i++)
+	for (i = 0; i < VIO_MOD_TO_REG_IND(ctx->vio_idx_num) - 1; i++)
 		writel(GENMASK(31, 0), reg + 4 * i);
 
-	writel(GENMASK(VIO_MOD_TO_REG_OFF(ctx->data->vio_idx_num) - 1, 0),
+	writel(GENMASK(VIO_MOD_TO_REG_OFF(ctx->vio_idx_num) - 1, 0),
 	       reg + 4 * i);
 }
 
@@ -80,15 +83,15 @@ static void mask_module_irq(struct mtk_devapc_context *ctx, bool mask)
 	else
 		val = 0;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < VIO_MOD_TO_REG_IND(ctx->data->vio_idx_num) - 1; i++)
+	for (i = 0; i < VIO_MOD_TO_REG_IND(ctx->vio_idx_num) - 1; i++)
 		writel(val, reg + 4 * i);
 
 	val = readl(reg + 4 * i);
 	if (mask)
-		val |= GENMASK(VIO_MOD_TO_REG_OFF(ctx->data->vio_idx_num) - 1,
+		val |= GENMASK(VIO_MOD_TO_REG_OFF(ctx->vio_idx_num) - 1,
 			       0);
 	else
-		val &= ~GENMASK(VIO_MOD_TO_REG_OFF(ctx->data->vio_idx_num) - 1,
+		val &= ~GENMASK(VIO_MOD_TO_REG_OFF(ctx->vio_idx_num) - 1,
 				0);
 
 	writel(val, reg + 4 * i);
@@ -256,6 +259,16 @@ static int mtk_devapc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (!ctx->infra_base)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	/* Set vio_idx_num to default value.
+	 * If the value is 0, get the info from DT.
+	 */
+	ctx->vio_idx_num = ctx->data->vio_idx_num;
+	if (!ctx->vio_idx_num)
+		if (of_property_read_u32(node,
+					 "vio-idx-num",
+					 &ctx->vio_idx_num))
+			return -EINVAL;
+
 	devapc_irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(node, 0);
 	if (!devapc_irq)
 		return -EINVAL;
-- 
2.6.4
_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nina Wu <nina-cm.wu@mediatek.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Cc: Nina Wu <Nina-CM.Wu@mediatek.com>,
	Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>,
	 Neal Liu <neal.liu@mediatek.com>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	<srv_heupstream@mediatek.com>, <Jackson-kt.Chang@mediatek.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/7] soc: mediatek: devapc: get 'vio_idx_num' info from DT
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2021 16:19:32 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1617956377-4075-2-git-send-email-nina-cm.wu@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1617956377-4075-1-git-send-email-nina-cm.wu@mediatek.com>

From: Nina Wu <Nina-CM.Wu@mediatek.com>

For new ICs, there are multiple devapc HWs for different subsys.
The number of devices controlled by each devapc (i.e. 'vio_idx_num')
will be set in DT for per devapc node.
On the other hand, for old ICs which have only one devapc HW, the
'vio_idx_num' info is set in compatible data.
To be backward compatible, the 'vio_idx_num' in compatible data is set
as the default value. Only when the default value is 0 will we get the
'vio_idx_num' from DT.

Signed-off-by: Nina Wu <Nina-CM.Wu@mediatek.com>
---
 drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-devapc.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-devapc.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-devapc.c
index f1cea04..71643d1 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-devapc.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-devapc.c
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ struct mtk_devapc_vio_dbgs {
 };
 
 struct mtk_devapc_data {
-	/* numbers of violation index */
+	/* default numbers of violation index */
 	u32 vio_idx_num;
 
 	/* reg offset */
@@ -51,6 +51,9 @@ struct mtk_devapc_context {
 	void __iomem *infra_base;
 	struct clk *infra_clk;
 	const struct mtk_devapc_data *data;
+
+	/* numbers of violation index */
+	u32 vio_idx_num;
 };
 
 static void clear_vio_status(struct mtk_devapc_context *ctx)
@@ -60,10 +63,10 @@ static void clear_vio_status(struct mtk_devapc_context *ctx)
 
 	reg = ctx->infra_base + ctx->data->vio_sta_offset;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < VIO_MOD_TO_REG_IND(ctx->data->vio_idx_num) - 1; i++)
+	for (i = 0; i < VIO_MOD_TO_REG_IND(ctx->vio_idx_num) - 1; i++)
 		writel(GENMASK(31, 0), reg + 4 * i);
 
-	writel(GENMASK(VIO_MOD_TO_REG_OFF(ctx->data->vio_idx_num) - 1, 0),
+	writel(GENMASK(VIO_MOD_TO_REG_OFF(ctx->vio_idx_num) - 1, 0),
 	       reg + 4 * i);
 }
 
@@ -80,15 +83,15 @@ static void mask_module_irq(struct mtk_devapc_context *ctx, bool mask)
 	else
 		val = 0;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < VIO_MOD_TO_REG_IND(ctx->data->vio_idx_num) - 1; i++)
+	for (i = 0; i < VIO_MOD_TO_REG_IND(ctx->vio_idx_num) - 1; i++)
 		writel(val, reg + 4 * i);
 
 	val = readl(reg + 4 * i);
 	if (mask)
-		val |= GENMASK(VIO_MOD_TO_REG_OFF(ctx->data->vio_idx_num) - 1,
+		val |= GENMASK(VIO_MOD_TO_REG_OFF(ctx->vio_idx_num) - 1,
 			       0);
 	else
-		val &= ~GENMASK(VIO_MOD_TO_REG_OFF(ctx->data->vio_idx_num) - 1,
+		val &= ~GENMASK(VIO_MOD_TO_REG_OFF(ctx->vio_idx_num) - 1,
 				0);
 
 	writel(val, reg + 4 * i);
@@ -256,6 +259,16 @@ static int mtk_devapc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (!ctx->infra_base)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	/* Set vio_idx_num to default value.
+	 * If the value is 0, get the info from DT.
+	 */
+	ctx->vio_idx_num = ctx->data->vio_idx_num;
+	if (!ctx->vio_idx_num)
+		if (of_property_read_u32(node,
+					 "vio-idx-num",
+					 &ctx->vio_idx_num))
+			return -EINVAL;
+
 	devapc_irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(node, 0);
 	if (!devapc_irq)
 		return -EINVAL;
-- 
2.6.4
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-09  8:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-09  8:19 [PATCH v3 1/7] dt-bindings: devapc: Add 'vio-idx-num' field to support mt8192 Nina Wu
2021-04-09  8:19 ` Nina Wu
2021-04-09  8:19 ` Nina Wu
2021-04-09  8:19 ` Nina Wu [this message]
2021-04-09  8:19   ` [PATCH v3 2/7] soc: mediatek: devapc: get 'vio_idx_num' info from DT Nina Wu
2021-04-09  8:19   ` Nina Wu
2021-04-09  8:19 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] soc: mediatek: devapc: add shared flag to IRQ Nina Wu
2021-04-09  8:19   ` Nina Wu
2021-04-09  8:19   ` Nina Wu
2021-04-09  8:19 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] soc: mediatek: devapc: rename register variable infra_base Nina Wu
2021-04-09  8:19   ` Nina Wu
2021-04-09  8:19   ` Nina Wu
2021-04-09  8:19 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] soc: mediatek: devapc: add debug register for new IC support Nina Wu
2021-04-09  8:19   ` Nina Wu
2021-04-09  8:19   ` Nina Wu
2021-04-09  8:19 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] soc: mediatek: devapc: support mt8192 Nina Wu
2021-04-09  8:19   ` Nina Wu
2021-04-09  8:19   ` Nina Wu
2021-04-09  8:19 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] arm64: dts: mt8192: Add devapc node Nina Wu
2021-04-09  8:19   ` Nina Wu
2021-04-09  8:19   ` Nina Wu
2021-04-12 15:59 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] dt-bindings: devapc: Add 'vio-idx-num' field to support mt8192 Rob Herring
2021-04-12 15:59   ` Rob Herring
2021-04-12 15:59   ` Rob Herring

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1617956377-4075-2-git-send-email-nina-cm.wu@mediatek.com \
    --to=nina-cm.wu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=Jackson-kt.Chang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=neal.liu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=srv_heupstream@mediatek.com \
    --cc=thunder.leizhen@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.