From: Michael Ellerman <patch-notifications@ellerman.id.au>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Tony Ambardar <tony.ambardar@gmail.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Tony Ambardar <Tony.Ambardar@gmail.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] powerpc: fix EDEADLOCK redefinition error in uapi/asm/errno.h
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 14:00:07 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <161880480720.1398509.14927712402293166726.b4-ty@ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200917135437.1238787-1-Tony.Ambardar@gmail.com>
On Thu, 17 Sep 2020 06:54:37 -0700, Tony Ambardar wrote:
> A few archs like powerpc have different errno.h values for macros
> EDEADLOCK and EDEADLK. In code including both libc and linux versions of
> errno.h, this can result in multiple definitions of EDEADLOCK in the
> include chain. Definitions to the same value (e.g. seen with mips) do
> not raise warnings, but on powerpc there are redefinitions changing the
> value, which raise warnings and errors (if using "-Werror").
>
> [...]
Applied to powerpc/next.
[1/1] powerpc: fix EDEADLOCK redefinition error in uapi/asm/errno.h
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/7de21e679e6a789f3729e8402bc440b623a28eae
cheers
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michael Ellerman <patch-notifications@ellerman.id.au>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Tony Ambardar <tony.ambardar@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
Tony Ambardar <Tony.Ambardar@gmail.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] powerpc: fix EDEADLOCK redefinition error in uapi/asm/errno.h
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 14:00:07 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <161880480720.1398509.14927712402293166726.b4-ty@ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200917135437.1238787-1-Tony.Ambardar@gmail.com>
On Thu, 17 Sep 2020 06:54:37 -0700, Tony Ambardar wrote:
> A few archs like powerpc have different errno.h values for macros
> EDEADLOCK and EDEADLK. In code including both libc and linux versions of
> errno.h, this can result in multiple definitions of EDEADLOCK in the
> include chain. Definitions to the same value (e.g. seen with mips) do
> not raise warnings, but on powerpc there are redefinitions changing the
> value, which raise warnings and errors (if using "-Werror").
>
> [...]
Applied to powerpc/next.
[1/1] powerpc: fix EDEADLOCK redefinition error in uapi/asm/errno.h
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/7de21e679e6a789f3729e8402bc440b623a28eae
cheers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-19 4:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-16 7:42 [PATCH v1] powerpc: fix EDEADLOCK redefinition error in uapi/asm/errno.h Tony Ambardar
2020-09-16 7:42 ` Tony Ambardar
2020-09-17 0:07 ` [PATCH v2] " Tony Ambardar
2020-09-17 0:07 ` Tony Ambardar
2020-09-17 11:55 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-09-17 11:55 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-09-17 13:42 ` Tony Ambardar
2020-09-17 13:42 ` Tony Ambardar
2020-09-17 14:01 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-09-17 14:01 ` Arnd Bergmann
[not found] ` <CAK8P3a3FVoDzNb1TOA6cRQDdEc+st7KkBL70t0FeStEziQG4+A__37056.5000850306$1600351707$gmane$org@mail.gmail.com>
2020-09-17 14:34 ` Andreas Schwab
2020-09-17 14:34 ` Andreas Schwab
2020-09-19 4:15 ` Tony Ambardar
2020-09-19 4:15 ` Tony Ambardar
2020-09-17 13:54 ` [PATCH v3] " Tony Ambardar
2020-09-17 13:54 ` Tony Ambardar
2020-09-21 12:54 ` Sasha Levin
2020-09-22 8:38 ` Tony Ambardar
2020-09-22 8:38 ` Tony Ambardar
2021-04-16 4:34 ` Tony Ambardar
2021-04-16 4:34 ` Tony Ambardar
2021-04-16 10:41 ` Michael Ellerman
2021-04-16 10:41 ` Michael Ellerman
2021-04-17 1:00 ` Tony Ambardar
2021-04-17 1:00 ` Tony Ambardar
2021-04-19 4:00 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2021-04-19 4:00 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=161880480720.1398509.14927712402293166726.b4-ty@ellerman.id.au \
--to=patch-notifications@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=rosenp@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony.ambardar@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.