All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@mediatek.com>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	<linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <srv_heupstream@mediatek.com>,
	<yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com>, <eddie.huang@mediatek.com>,
	<cawa.cheng@mediatek.com>, <bibby.hsieh@mediatek.com>,
	<ck.hu@mediatek.com>, <stonea168@163.com>,
	<huijuan.xie@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] pwm: mtk-disp: move the commit to clock enabled
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2021 10:29:19 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1623378559.24490.12.camel@mszsdaap41> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210606211457.ya5nbp6fqevuhzwa@pengutronix.de>

On Sun, 2021-06-06 at 23:14 +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 06:05:30PM +0800, Jitao Shi wrote:
> > Due to the clock sequence changing, so move the reg commit to
> 
> Which change do you refer to, here? The previous patch? If so, I assume
> this means the series is not bisectable because the driver is broken
> when only the first patch is applied?
> 
Yes, this patch is depend the previous patch.
I'll squash it to the previous patch in next version.


> > config().
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c | 20 +++++++-------------
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c
> > index b5771e2c54b8..b87b3c00a685 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c
> > @@ -135,6 +135,13 @@ static int mtk_disp_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> >  		mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, mdp->data->commit,
> >  					 mdp->data->commit_mask,
> >  					 0x0);
> > +	} else {
> 
> You dropped the code comment? Is it wrong? Or is it too obvious to be
> mentioned?
> 

I'll fix them next verison.

> > +		mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, mdp->data->bls_debug,
> > +					 mdp->data->bls_debug_mask,
> > +					 mdp->data->bls_debug_mask);
> > +		mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, mdp->data->con0,
> > +					 mdp->data->con0_sel,
> > +					 mdp->data->con0_sel);
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	return 0;
> > @@ -208,19 +215,6 @@ static int mtk_disp_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  
> >  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, mdp);
> >  
> > -	/*
> > -	 * For MT2701, disable double buffer before writing register
> > -	 * and select manual mode and use PWM_PERIOD/PWM_HIGH_WIDTH.
> > -	 */
> > -	if (!mdp->data->has_commit) {
> > -		mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, mdp->data->bls_debug,
> > -					 mdp->data->bls_debug_mask,
> > -					 mdp->data->bls_debug_mask);
> > -		mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, mdp->data->con0,
> > -					 mdp->data->con0_sel,
> > -					 mdp->data->con0_sel);
> > -	}
> > -
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> 
> Best regards
> Uwe
> 

Best Regards
Jitao


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@mediatek.com>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	<linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	 <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <srv_heupstream@mediatek.com>,
	<yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com>, <eddie.huang@mediatek.com>,
	<cawa.cheng@mediatek.com>, <bibby.hsieh@mediatek.com>,
	<ck.hu@mediatek.com>, <stonea168@163.com>,
	<huijuan.xie@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] pwm: mtk-disp: move the commit to clock enabled
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2021 10:29:19 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1623378559.24490.12.camel@mszsdaap41> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210606211457.ya5nbp6fqevuhzwa@pengutronix.de>

On Sun, 2021-06-06 at 23:14 +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 06:05:30PM +0800, Jitao Shi wrote:
> > Due to the clock sequence changing, so move the reg commit to
> 
> Which change do you refer to, here? The previous patch? If so, I assume
> this means the series is not bisectable because the driver is broken
> when only the first patch is applied?
> 
Yes, this patch is depend the previous patch.
I'll squash it to the previous patch in next version.


> > config().
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c | 20 +++++++-------------
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c
> > index b5771e2c54b8..b87b3c00a685 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c
> > @@ -135,6 +135,13 @@ static int mtk_disp_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> >  		mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, mdp->data->commit,
> >  					 mdp->data->commit_mask,
> >  					 0x0);
> > +	} else {
> 
> You dropped the code comment? Is it wrong? Or is it too obvious to be
> mentioned?
> 

I'll fix them next verison.

> > +		mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, mdp->data->bls_debug,
> > +					 mdp->data->bls_debug_mask,
> > +					 mdp->data->bls_debug_mask);
> > +		mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, mdp->data->con0,
> > +					 mdp->data->con0_sel,
> > +					 mdp->data->con0_sel);
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	return 0;
> > @@ -208,19 +215,6 @@ static int mtk_disp_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  
> >  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, mdp);
> >  
> > -	/*
> > -	 * For MT2701, disable double buffer before writing register
> > -	 * and select manual mode and use PWM_PERIOD/PWM_HIGH_WIDTH.
> > -	 */
> > -	if (!mdp->data->has_commit) {
> > -		mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, mdp->data->bls_debug,
> > -					 mdp->data->bls_debug_mask,
> > -					 mdp->data->bls_debug_mask);
> > -		mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, mdp->data->con0,
> > -					 mdp->data->con0_sel,
> > -					 mdp->data->con0_sel);
> > -	}
> > -
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> 
> Best regards
> Uwe
> 

Best Regards
Jitao

_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@mediatek.com>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	<linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	 <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <srv_heupstream@mediatek.com>,
	<yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com>, <eddie.huang@mediatek.com>,
	<cawa.cheng@mediatek.com>, <bibby.hsieh@mediatek.com>,
	<ck.hu@mediatek.com>, <stonea168@163.com>,
	<huijuan.xie@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] pwm: mtk-disp: move the commit to clock enabled
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2021 10:29:19 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1623378559.24490.12.camel@mszsdaap41> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210606211457.ya5nbp6fqevuhzwa@pengutronix.de>

On Sun, 2021-06-06 at 23:14 +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 06:05:30PM +0800, Jitao Shi wrote:
> > Due to the clock sequence changing, so move the reg commit to
> 
> Which change do you refer to, here? The previous patch? If so, I assume
> this means the series is not bisectable because the driver is broken
> when only the first patch is applied?
> 
Yes, this patch is depend the previous patch.
I'll squash it to the previous patch in next version.


> > config().
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c | 20 +++++++-------------
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c
> > index b5771e2c54b8..b87b3c00a685 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c
> > @@ -135,6 +135,13 @@ static int mtk_disp_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> >  		mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, mdp->data->commit,
> >  					 mdp->data->commit_mask,
> >  					 0x0);
> > +	} else {
> 
> You dropped the code comment? Is it wrong? Or is it too obvious to be
> mentioned?
> 

I'll fix them next verison.

> > +		mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, mdp->data->bls_debug,
> > +					 mdp->data->bls_debug_mask,
> > +					 mdp->data->bls_debug_mask);
> > +		mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, mdp->data->con0,
> > +					 mdp->data->con0_sel,
> > +					 mdp->data->con0_sel);
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	return 0;
> > @@ -208,19 +215,6 @@ static int mtk_disp_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  
> >  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, mdp);
> >  
> > -	/*
> > -	 * For MT2701, disable double buffer before writing register
> > -	 * and select manual mode and use PWM_PERIOD/PWM_HIGH_WIDTH.
> > -	 */
> > -	if (!mdp->data->has_commit) {
> > -		mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, mdp->data->bls_debug,
> > -					 mdp->data->bls_debug_mask,
> > -					 mdp->data->bls_debug_mask);
> > -		mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, mdp->data->con0,
> > -					 mdp->data->con0_sel,
> > -					 mdp->data->con0_sel);
> > -	}
> > -
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> 
> Best regards
> Uwe
> 

Best Regards
Jitao

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-11  2:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-03 10:05 [PATCH v4 0/3] fix the clock on/off mismatch and switch pwm api to atomic API Jitao Shi
2021-06-03 10:05 ` Jitao Shi
2021-06-03 10:05 ` Jitao Shi
2021-06-03 10:05 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] pwm: mtk-disp: adjust the clocks to avoid them mismatch Jitao Shi
2021-06-03 10:05   ` Jitao Shi
2021-06-03 10:05   ` Jitao Shi
2021-06-06 21:11   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-06-06 21:11     ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-06-06 21:11     ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-06-11  2:03     ` Jitao Shi
2021-06-03 10:05 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] pwm: mtk-disp: move the commit to clock enabled Jitao Shi
2021-06-03 10:05   ` Jitao Shi
2021-06-03 10:05   ` Jitao Shi
2021-06-06 21:14   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-06-06 21:14     ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-06-06 21:14     ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-06-11  2:29     ` Jitao Shi [this message]
2021-06-11  2:29       ` Jitao Shi
2021-06-11  2:29       ` Jitao Shi
2021-06-03 10:05 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] pwm: mtk-disp: Switch to atomic API Jitao Shi
2021-06-03 10:05   ` Jitao Shi
2021-06-03 10:05   ` Jitao Shi
2021-06-06 21:22   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-06-06 21:22     ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-06-06 21:22     ` Uwe Kleine-König
2021-06-11  2:37     ` Jitao Shi
2021-06-11  2:37       ` Jitao Shi
2021-06-11  2:37       ` Jitao Shi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1623378559.24490.12.camel@mszsdaap41 \
    --to=jitao.shi@mediatek.com \
    --cc=bibby.hsieh@mediatek.com \
    --cc=cawa.cheng@mediatek.com \
    --cc=ck.hu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=eddie.huang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=huijuan.xie@mediatek.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=srv_heupstream@mediatek.com \
    --cc=stonea168@163.com \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.