From: Michael Ellerman <patch-notifications@ellerman.id.au>
To: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH 0/6] add missing of_node_put
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 20:35:58 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <163783295820.1228879.10682208282272545718.b4-ty@ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1448051604-25256-1-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
On Fri, 20 Nov 2015 20:33:18 +0000, Julia Lawall wrote:
> The various for_each device_node iterators performs an of_node_get on each
> iteration, so a break out of the loop requires an of_node_put.
>
> The complete semantic patch that fixes this problem is
> (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr):
>
> // <smpl>
> @r@
> local idexpression n;
> expression e1,e2;
> iterator name for_each_node_by_name, for_each_node_by_type,
> for_each_compatible_node, for_each_matching_node,
> for_each_matching_node_and_match, for_each_child_of_node,
> for_each_available_child_of_node, for_each_node_with_property;
> iterator i;
> statement S;
> expression list [n1] es;
> @@
>
> [...]
Patch 5 applied to powerpc/next.
[5/6] powerpc/btext: add missing of_node_put
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/a1d2b210ffa52d60acabbf7b6af3ef7e1e69cda0
cheers
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michael Ellerman <patch-notifications@ellerman.id.au>
To: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH 0/6] add missing of_node_put
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 20:35:58 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <163783295820.1228879.10682208282272545718.b4-ty@ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1448051604-25256-1-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
On Fri, 20 Nov 2015 20:33:18 +0000, Julia Lawall wrote:
> The various for_each device_node iterators performs an of_node_get on each
> iteration, so a break out of the loop requires an of_node_put.
>
> The complete semantic patch that fixes this problem is
> (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr):
>
> // <smpl>
> @r@
> local idexpression n;
> expression e1,e2;
> iterator name for_each_node_by_name, for_each_node_by_type,
> for_each_compatible_node, for_each_matching_node,
> for_each_matching_node_and_match, for_each_child_of_node,
> for_each_available_child_of_node, for_each_node_with_property;
> iterator i;
> statement S;
> expression list [n1] es;
> @@
>
> [...]
Patch 5 applied to powerpc/next.
[5/6] powerpc/btext: add missing of_node_put
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/a1d2b210ffa52d60acabbf7b6af3ef7e1e69cda0
cheers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-25 9:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-20 20:33 [PATCH 0/6] add missing of_node_put Julia Lawall
2015-11-20 20:33 ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-20 20:33 ` [PATCH 1/6] powerpc/6xx: " Julia Lawall
2015-11-20 20:33 ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-20 20:33 ` [PATCH 2/6] powerpc/pseries: " Julia Lawall
2015-11-20 20:33 ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-20 20:33 ` [PATCH 3/6] powerpc/powernv: " Julia Lawall
2015-11-20 20:33 ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-20 20:33 ` [PATCH 4/6] powerpc/kexec: " Julia Lawall
2015-11-20 20:33 ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-20 20:33 ` [PATCH 5/6] powerpc/btext: " Julia Lawall
2015-11-20 20:33 ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-20 20:33 ` [PATCH 6/6] powerpc/cell: " Julia Lawall
2015-11-20 20:33 ` Julia Lawall
2021-11-25 9:35 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2021-11-25 9:35 ` (subset) [PATCH 0/6] " Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=163783295820.1228879.10682208282272545718.b4-ty@ellerman.id.au \
--to=patch-notifications@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.