All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "NeilBrown" <neilb@suse.de>
To: "Chuck Lever III" <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc: "Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
	"Linux NFS Mailing List" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/19] SUNRPC: use sv_lock to protect updates to sv_nrthreads.
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 11:11:17 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <163814467728.26075.9969415181039584323@noble.neil.brown.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3877F926-545B-41AF-8C0C-80582E83F1FE@oracle.com>

On Wed, 24 Nov 2021, Chuck Lever III wrote:
> > @@ -639,7 +639,10 @@ svc_prepare_thread(struct svc_serv *serv, struct svc_pool *pool, int node)
> > 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> > 
> > 	svc_get(serv);
> > -	serv->sv_nrthreads++;
> > +	spin_lock_bh(&serv->sv_lock);
> > +	serv->sv_nrthreads += 1;
> > +	spin_unlock_bh(&serv->sv_lock);
> 
> atomic_t would be somewhat lighter weight. Can it be used here
> instead?
> 

We could....  but sv_nrthreads is read-mostly.  There are 11 places
where we would need to call "atomic_read()", and just two where we
benefit from the simplicity of atomic_inc/dec.

And even if I did achieve dynamic threads count management, we would not
be changing sv_nrthreads often enough that any performance difference
would be noticeable.
So I'd rather stick with using the spinlock and keeping the read-side
simple.

Thanks,
NeilBrown

  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-29  0:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-23  1:29 [PATCH 00/19 v2] SUNRPC: clean up server thread management NeilBrown
2021-11-23  1:29 ` [PATCH 15/19] lockd: rename lockd_create_svc() to lockd_get() NeilBrown
2021-11-23  1:29 ` [PATCH 13/19] lockd: move svc_exit_thread() into the thread NeilBrown
2021-11-23  1:29 ` [PATCH 06/19] NFSD: narrow nfsd_mutex protection in nfsd thread NeilBrown
2021-11-23  1:29 ` [PATCH 05/19] SUNRPC: use sv_lock to protect updates to sv_nrthreads NeilBrown
2021-11-23 16:43   ` Chuck Lever III
2021-11-29  0:11     ` NeilBrown [this message]
2021-11-23  1:29 ` [PATCH 10/19] lockd: introduce nlmsvc_serv NeilBrown
2021-11-23  1:29 ` [PATCH 14/19] lockd: introduce lockd_put() NeilBrown
2021-11-23  1:29 ` [PATCH 02/19] NFSD: handle error better in write_ports_addfd() NeilBrown
2021-11-23 16:44   ` Chuck Lever III
2021-11-28 23:49     ` NeilBrown
2021-11-23  1:29 ` [PATCH 12/19] lockd: move lockd_start_svc() call into lockd_create_svc() NeilBrown
2021-11-23  1:29 ` [PATCH 16/19] SUNRPC: move the pool_map definitions (back) into svc.c NeilBrown
2021-11-23  1:29 ` [PATCH 07/19] NFSD: Make it possible to use svc_set_num_threads_sync NeilBrown
2021-11-23  1:29 ` [PATCH 04/19] nfsd: make nfsd_stats.th_cnt atomic_t NeilBrown
2021-11-23  1:29 ` [PATCH 01/19] SUNRPC/NFSD: clean up get/put functions NeilBrown
2021-11-23 16:45   ` Chuck Lever III
2021-11-28 23:36     ` NeilBrown
2021-11-23  1:29 ` [PATCH 18/19] lockd: use svc_set_num_threads() for thread start and stop NeilBrown
2021-11-23  1:29 ` [PATCH 09/19] NFSD: simplify locking for network notifier NeilBrown
2021-11-23  1:29 ` [PATCH 11/19] lockd: simplify management of network status notifiers NeilBrown
2021-11-23  1:29 ` [PATCH 08/19] SUNRPC: discard svo_setup and rename svc_set_num_threads_sync() NeilBrown
2021-11-23  1:29 ` [PATCH 19/19] NFS: switch the callback service back to non-pooled NeilBrown
2021-11-23  1:29 ` [PATCH 03/19] SUNRPC: stop using ->sv_nrthreads as a refcount NeilBrown
2021-11-23  1:29 ` [PATCH 17/19] SUNRPC: always treat sv_nrpools==1 as "not pooled" NeilBrown
2021-11-23 14:49 ` [PATCH 00/19 v2] SUNRPC: clean up server thread management J. Bruce Fields
2021-11-24 18:42   ` Chuck Lever III

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=163814467728.26075.9969415181039584323@noble.neil.brown.name \
    --to=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.