From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, drjones@redhat.com,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
oupton@google.com, reijiw@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] kvm: selftests: aarch64: some fixes for vgic_irq
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 17:37:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <164434147328.3931943.5336012810624636920.b4-ty@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220127030858.3269036-1-ricarkol@google.com>
On Wed, 26 Jan 2022 19:08:53 -0800, Ricardo Koller wrote:
> Reiji discovered multiple issues with the vgic_irq series [0]:
> 1. there's an assert that needs fixing.
> 2. some guest arguments are not set correctly.
> 3. the failure test in kvm_set_gsi_routing_irqchip_check is wrong.
> 4. there are lots of comments that use the wrong formatting.
> 5. vgic_poke_irq() could use a tighter assert check.
>
> [...]
Applied to next, thanks!
[1/5] kvm: selftests: aarch64: fix assert in gicv3_access_reg
commit: cc94d47ce16d4147d546e47c8248e8bd12ba5fe5
[2/5] kvm: selftests: aarch64: pass vgic_irq guest args as a pointer
commit: 11024a7a0ac26dd31ddfa0f6590e158bdf9ab858
[3/5] kvm: selftests: aarch64: fix the failure check in kvm_set_gsi_routing_irqchip_check
commit: 5b7898648f02083012900e48d063e51ccbdad165
[4/5] kvm: selftests: aarch64: fix some vgic related comments
commit: a5cd38fd9c47b23abc6df08d6ee6a71b39038185
[5/5] kvm: selftests: aarch64: use a tighter assert in vgic_poke_irq()
commit: b53de63a89244c196d8a2ea76b6754e3fdb4b626
Cheers,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, drjones@redhat.com,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] kvm: selftests: aarch64: some fixes for vgic_irq
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 17:37:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <164434147328.3931943.5336012810624636920.b4-ty@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220127030858.3269036-1-ricarkol@google.com>
On Wed, 26 Jan 2022 19:08:53 -0800, Ricardo Koller wrote:
> Reiji discovered multiple issues with the vgic_irq series [0]:
> 1. there's an assert that needs fixing.
> 2. some guest arguments are not set correctly.
> 3. the failure test in kvm_set_gsi_routing_irqchip_check is wrong.
> 4. there are lots of comments that use the wrong formatting.
> 5. vgic_poke_irq() could use a tighter assert check.
>
> [...]
Applied to next, thanks!
[1/5] kvm: selftests: aarch64: fix assert in gicv3_access_reg
commit: cc94d47ce16d4147d546e47c8248e8bd12ba5fe5
[2/5] kvm: selftests: aarch64: pass vgic_irq guest args as a pointer
commit: 11024a7a0ac26dd31ddfa0f6590e158bdf9ab858
[3/5] kvm: selftests: aarch64: fix the failure check in kvm_set_gsi_routing_irqchip_check
commit: 5b7898648f02083012900e48d063e51ccbdad165
[4/5] kvm: selftests: aarch64: fix some vgic related comments
commit: a5cd38fd9c47b23abc6df08d6ee6a71b39038185
[5/5] kvm: selftests: aarch64: use a tighter assert in vgic_poke_irq()
commit: b53de63a89244c196d8a2ea76b6754e3fdb4b626
Cheers,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-08 17:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-27 3:08 [PATCH v2 0/5] kvm: selftests: aarch64: some fixes for vgic_irq Ricardo Koller
2022-01-27 3:08 ` Ricardo Koller
2022-01-27 3:08 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] kvm: selftests: aarch64: fix assert in gicv3_access_reg Ricardo Koller
2022-01-27 3:08 ` Ricardo Koller
2022-01-27 7:34 ` Andrew Jones
2022-01-27 7:34 ` Andrew Jones
2022-01-27 3:08 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] kvm: selftests: aarch64: pass vgic_irq guest args as a pointer Ricardo Koller
2022-01-27 3:08 ` Ricardo Koller
2022-01-27 7:46 ` Andrew Jones
2022-01-27 7:46 ` Andrew Jones
2022-01-27 3:08 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] kvm: selftests: aarch64: fix the failure check in kvm_set_gsi_routing_irqchip_check Ricardo Koller
2022-01-27 3:08 ` Ricardo Koller
2022-01-27 3:08 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] kvm: selftests: aarch64: fix some vgic related comments Ricardo Koller
2022-01-27 3:08 ` Ricardo Koller
2022-01-27 7:49 ` Andrew Jones
2022-01-27 7:49 ` Andrew Jones
2022-01-27 15:06 ` Ricardo Koller
2022-01-27 15:06 ` Ricardo Koller
2022-01-27 3:08 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] kvm: selftests: aarch64: use a tighter assert in vgic_poke_irq() Ricardo Koller
2022-01-27 3:08 ` Ricardo Koller
2022-01-27 7:51 ` Andrew Jones
2022-01-27 7:51 ` Andrew Jones
2022-02-08 17:37 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2022-02-08 17:37 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] kvm: selftests: aarch64: some fixes for vgic_irq Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=164434147328.3931943.5336012810624636920.b4-ty@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=oupton@google.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=reijiw@google.com \
--cc=ricarkol@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.