Re: [PATCH 0/3] spi: stm32-qspi: flags management fixes

From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com, patrice.chotard@foss.st.com
Cc: linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
	christophe.kerello@foss.st.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] spi: stm32-qspi: flags management fixes
Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 19:49:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <165229499740.364474.10772649163744226308.b4-ty@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220511074644.558874-1-patrice.chotard@foss.st.com>

On Wed, 11 May 2022 09:46:41 +0200, patrice.chotard@foss.st.com wrote:
> From: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@foss.st.com>
> 
> This series update flags management in the following cases:
>   - In APM mode, don't take care of TCF and TEF flags
>   - Always check TCF flag in stm32_qspi_wait_cmd()
>   - Don't check BUSY flag when sending new command
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/3] spi: stm32-qspi: Fix wait_cmd timeout in APM mode
      commit: d83d89ea68b4726700fa87b22db075e4217e691c
[2/3] spi: stm32-qspi: Always check SR_TCF flags in stm32_qspi_wait_cmd()
      commit: 0cf8d32600cf5660ee45d421f1b6e3a129ca58b6
[3/3] spi: stm32-qspi: Remove SR_BUSY bit check before sending command
      commit: ae16cc18f37bcdea7d4ef57a5e526a60b09a1506

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark