From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
To: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>,
Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com>,
Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>,
Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@quicinc.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: display: msm: Add missing unevaluatedProperties on child node schemas
Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2023 17:01:17 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <169677325602.2570975.10339984139706350311.b4-ty@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230925212434.1972368-1-robh@kernel.org>
On Mon, 25 Sep 2023 16:24:24 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> Just as unevaluatedProperties or additionalProperties are required at
> the top level of schemas, they should (and will) also be required for
> child node schemas. That ensures only documented properties are
> present for any node.
>
>
Applied, thanks!
[1/2] dt-bindings: display: msm: Add missing unevaluatedProperties on child node schemas
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/lumag/msm/-/commit/08bf97ab16f3
[2/2] dt-bindings: display: msm: Make "additionalProperties: true" explicit
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/lumag/msm/-/commit/55bbcadccdec
Best regards,
--
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
To: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>,
Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com>,
Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>,
Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@quicinc.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: display: msm: Add missing unevaluatedProperties on child node schemas
Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2023 17:01:17 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <169677325602.2570975.10339984139706350311.b4-ty@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230925212434.1972368-1-robh@kernel.org>
On Mon, 25 Sep 2023 16:24:24 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> Just as unevaluatedProperties or additionalProperties are required at
> the top level of schemas, they should (and will) also be required for
> child node schemas. That ensures only documented properties are
> present for any node.
>
>
Applied, thanks!
[1/2] dt-bindings: display: msm: Add missing unevaluatedProperties on child node schemas
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/lumag/msm/-/commit/08bf97ab16f3
[2/2] dt-bindings: display: msm: Make "additionalProperties: true" explicit
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/lumag/msm/-/commit/55bbcadccdec
Best regards,
--
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-08 14:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-25 21:24 [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: display: msm: Add missing unevaluatedProperties on child node schemas Rob Herring
2023-09-25 21:24 ` Rob Herring
2023-09-25 21:24 ` [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: display: msm: Make "additionalProperties: true" explicit Rob Herring
2023-09-25 21:24 ` Rob Herring
2023-09-26 12:58 ` Conor Dooley
2023-09-26 12:58 ` Conor Dooley
2023-09-26 12:56 ` [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: display: msm: Add missing unevaluatedProperties on child node schemas Conor Dooley
2023-09-26 12:56 ` Conor Dooley
2023-10-08 14:01 ` Dmitry Baryshkov [this message]
2023-10-08 14:01 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=169677325602.2570975.10339984139706350311.b4-ty@linaro.org \
--to=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marijn.suijten@somainline.org \
--cc=quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_khsieh@quicinc.com \
--cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sean@poorly.run \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.