All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Dustin Kirkland <kirkland@canonical.com>
Cc: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@redhat.com>,
	Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] qemu-kvm: fix segfault when running kvm without /dev/kvm,  falling back to non-accelerated mode
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 13:36:11 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090904163611.GC5132@amt.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1252080398.4625.47.camel@x200>

On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 11:06:38AM -0500, Dustin Kirkland wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-09-04 at 08:22 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 19:18 -0300, Glauber Costa wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Dustin Kirkland<kirkland@canonical.com> wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Mark McLoughlin<markmc@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > >> On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 12:31 -0500, Dustin Kirkland wrote:
> > > >>> qemu-kvm: fix segfault when running kvm without /dev/kvm, falling back
> > > >>> to non-accelerated mode
> > > >>>
> > > >>> We're seeing segfaults on systems without access to /dev/kvm.  It
> > > >>> looks like the global kvm_allowed is being set just a little too late
> > > >>> in vl.c.  This patch moves the kvm initialization a bit higher in the
> > > >>> vl.c main, just after options processing, and solves the segfaults.
> > > >>> We're carrying this patch in Ubuntu 9.10 Alpha.  Please apply
> > > >>> upstream, or advise if and why this might not be the optimal solution.
> > > >>
> > > >> Ah discussion about an alternative fix for this fizzled out recently:
> > > >>
> > > >>  http://www.mail-archive.com/kvm@vger.kernel.org/msg19890.html
> > > >
> > > > Ah, thanks Mark.  In that thread, I found Daniel's suggestion the most
> > > > reasonable, and user-friendly:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Daniel P. Berrange<berrange@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > >> Well, we could go for logic like:
> > > >>
> > > >>  * No arg given          => try kvm, try kqemu, try tcg
> > > >>  * --accelmode arg given => try $arg, and fail if unavailable
> > > >>
> > > >> then libvirt would simply always supply --accelmode for all VMs,
> > > >> while people running qemu manually would get best available
> > > I sent some patches to do that, but they were incomplete, and I was
> > > preempted by something else.
> > > If you want, you can wait for my cycles to come back, or pick from where I left
> 
> Thanks for the pointer, Glauber.  My cycles a bit constrained too, but
> I'll have a look when I get a chance.
> 
> > In the meantime, can we commit to stable-0.11 either Dustin's fix or
> > this:
> > 
> >   http://git.et.redhat.com/?p=qemu-fedora.git;a=commitdiff;h=aa1620047b
> 
> +1.  We're looking for something agreeable in stable-0.11, that solves
> the segfault and proceeds without VT acceleration.

Dustin,

Can you please resend the patch with the suggestion i made earlier, for
stable-0.11?



WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Dustin Kirkland <kirkland@canonical.com>
Cc: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] qemu-kvm: fix segfault when running kvm without /dev/kvm,  falling back to non-accelerated mode
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 13:36:11 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090904163611.GC5132@amt.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1252080398.4625.47.camel@x200>

On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 11:06:38AM -0500, Dustin Kirkland wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-09-04 at 08:22 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 19:18 -0300, Glauber Costa wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Dustin Kirkland<kirkland@canonical.com> wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Mark McLoughlin<markmc@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > >> On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 12:31 -0500, Dustin Kirkland wrote:
> > > >>> qemu-kvm: fix segfault when running kvm without /dev/kvm, falling back
> > > >>> to non-accelerated mode
> > > >>>
> > > >>> We're seeing segfaults on systems without access to /dev/kvm.  It
> > > >>> looks like the global kvm_allowed is being set just a little too late
> > > >>> in vl.c.  This patch moves the kvm initialization a bit higher in the
> > > >>> vl.c main, just after options processing, and solves the segfaults.
> > > >>> We're carrying this patch in Ubuntu 9.10 Alpha.  Please apply
> > > >>> upstream, or advise if and why this might not be the optimal solution.
> > > >>
> > > >> Ah discussion about an alternative fix for this fizzled out recently:
> > > >>
> > > >>  http://www.mail-archive.com/kvm@vger.kernel.org/msg19890.html
> > > >
> > > > Ah, thanks Mark.  In that thread, I found Daniel's suggestion the most
> > > > reasonable, and user-friendly:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Daniel P. Berrange<berrange@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > >> Well, we could go for logic like:
> > > >>
> > > >>  * No arg given          => try kvm, try kqemu, try tcg
> > > >>  * --accelmode arg given => try $arg, and fail if unavailable
> > > >>
> > > >> then libvirt would simply always supply --accelmode for all VMs,
> > > >> while people running qemu manually would get best available
> > > I sent some patches to do that, but they were incomplete, and I was
> > > preempted by something else.
> > > If you want, you can wait for my cycles to come back, or pick from where I left
> 
> Thanks for the pointer, Glauber.  My cycles a bit constrained too, but
> I'll have a look when I get a chance.
> 
> > In the meantime, can we commit to stable-0.11 either Dustin's fix or
> > this:
> > 
> >   http://git.et.redhat.com/?p=qemu-fedora.git;a=commitdiff;h=aa1620047b
> 
> +1.  We're looking for something agreeable in stable-0.11, that solves
> the segfault and proceeds without VT acceleration.

Dustin,

Can you please resend the patch with the suggestion i made earlier, for
stable-0.11?

  reply	other threads:[~2009-09-04 16:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-03 17:31 [PATCH] qemu-kvm: fix segfault when running kvm without /dev/kvm, falling back to non-accelerated mode Dustin Kirkland
2009-09-03 17:31 ` [Qemu-devel] " Dustin Kirkland
2009-09-03 19:55 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-09-03 19:55   ` [Qemu-devel] " Marcelo Tosatti
2009-09-03 20:01 ` Mark McLoughlin
2009-09-03 20:01   ` [Qemu-devel] " Mark McLoughlin
2009-09-03 21:48   ` Dustin Kirkland
2009-09-03 21:48     ` [Qemu-devel] " Dustin Kirkland
2009-09-03 22:18     ` Glauber Costa
2009-09-03 22:18       ` [Qemu-devel] " Glauber Costa
2009-09-04  7:22       ` Mark McLoughlin
2009-09-04  7:22         ` [Qemu-devel] " Mark McLoughlin
2009-09-04 16:06         ` Dustin Kirkland
2009-09-04 16:06           ` [Qemu-devel] " Dustin Kirkland
2009-09-04 16:36           ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2009-09-04 16:36             ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-09-04 19:38             ` Dustin Kirkland
2009-09-04 19:38               ` [Qemu-devel] " Dustin Kirkland
2009-09-04 21:39               ` Luiz Capitulino
2009-09-04 21:39                 ` Luiz Capitulino
2009-09-04 21:46                 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-09-04 21:46                   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-09-04 22:03                   ` Luiz Capitulino
2009-09-04 22:03                     ` Luiz Capitulino
2009-09-03 20:05 ` Luiz Capitulino
2009-09-03 20:05   ` [Qemu-devel] " Luiz Capitulino

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090904163611.GC5132@amt.cnet \
    --to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=glommer@gmail.com \
    --cc=kirkland@canonical.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=markmc@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.