From: Florian Mickler <florian@mickler.org>
To: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: Oops in i915 intel_init_clock_gating
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 18:52:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110623185212.4ec716b6@schatten.dmk.lab> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1106221504070.1977-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:04:56 -0400 (EDT)
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Jun 2011, Keith Packard wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 13:32:56 -0700, Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> wrote:
> >
> > I haven't seen any comments as to whether this patch needs to be merged
> > into the kernel. Has anyone tested this?
>
> I have tested it, and it worked well on my system:
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=130817292323254&w=2
>
> Alan Stern
>
Some clock-gating patch was also proposed here:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37252
Regards,
Flo
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Florian Mickler <florian@mickler.org>
To: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: Oops in i915 intel_init_clock_gating
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 18:52:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110623185212.4ec716b6@schatten.dmk.lab> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1106221504070.1977-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:04:56 -0400 (EDT)
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Jun 2011, Keith Packard wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 13:32:56 -0700, Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> wrote:
> >
> > I haven't seen any comments as to whether this patch needs to be merged
> > into the kernel. Has anyone tested this?
>
> I have tested it, and it worked well on my system:
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=130817292323254&w=2
>
> Alan Stern
>
Some clock-gating patch was also proposed here:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37252
Regards,
Flo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-23 16:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-15 20:08 Oops in i915 intel_init_clock_gating Alan Stern
2011-06-15 20:32 ` Jesse Barnes
2011-06-15 21:14 ` Alan Stern
2011-06-15 21:14 ` Alan Stern
2011-06-22 18:12 ` Keith Packard
2011-06-22 19:04 ` Alan Stern
2011-06-22 19:04 ` Alan Stern
2011-06-23 16:52 ` Florian Mickler [this message]
2011-06-23 16:52 ` Florian Mickler
2011-06-23 17:11 ` Alan Stern
2011-06-23 17:11 ` Alan Stern
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-06-05 0:02 Scott Ashcroft
2011-06-05 6:22 ` Keith Packard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110623185212.4ec716b6@schatten.dmk.lab \
--to=florian@mickler.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=keithp@keithp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.