All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@avionic-design.de>
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
	Beno??t Th??baudeau <benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
	linux-input@vger.kernel.org, Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@canonical.com>,
	Richard Purdie <rpurdie@rpsys.net>,
	linux-leds@vger.kernel.org,
	Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@gmx.de>,
	linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pwm: Call pwm_enable() before pwm_config()
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 20:05:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120920190544.GB13264@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120823190402.GA8127@avionic-0098.mockup.avionic-design.de>

On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 09:04:02PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:

> Using runtime PM for this sounds indeed like the most generic approach.
> I'm not very familiar with the API, but I thought it required explicit
> architecture or bus support (or the driver itself can provide hooks via
> pm_ops), so it might be difficult to implement for platforms that don't
> have working runtime PM support. I'll have to look into this some more.

It doesn't require explicit arch support, though many architectures
choose to integrate their PM frameworks with it either directly or via
power domains.  If the architecture doesn't do anything with it then it
should just work at the driver level.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pwm: Call pwm_enable() before pwm_config()
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 19:05:44 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120920190544.GB13264@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120823190402.GA8127@avionic-0098.mockup.avionic-design.de>

On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 09:04:02PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:

> Using runtime PM for this sounds indeed like the most generic approach.
> I'm not very familiar with the API, but I thought it required explicit
> architecture or bus support (or the driver itself can provide hooks via
> pm_ops), so it might be difficult to implement for platforms that don't
> have working runtime PM support. I'll have to look into this some more.

It doesn't require explicit arch support, though many architectures
choose to integrate their PM frameworks with it either directly or via
power domains.  If the architecture doesn't do anything with it then it
should just work at the driver level.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] pwm: Call pwm_enable() before pwm_config()
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 20:05:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120920190544.GB13264@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120823190402.GA8127@avionic-0098.mockup.avionic-design.de>

On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 09:04:02PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:

> Using runtime PM for this sounds indeed like the most generic approach.
> I'm not very familiar with the API, but I thought it required explicit
> architecture or bus support (or the driver itself can provide hooks via
> pm_ops), so it might be difficult to implement for platforms that don't
> have working runtime PM support. I'll have to look into this some more.

It doesn't require explicit arch support, though many architectures
choose to integrate their PM frameworks with it either directly or via
power domains.  If the architecture doesn't do anything with it then it
should just work at the driver level.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-09-20 19:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <322770447.2755463.1345727876098.JavaMail.root@advansee.com>
2012-08-23 13:36 ` [BUG] leds-pwm: First setting of brightness does nothing Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-08-23 13:36   ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-08-23 14:19   ` [PATCH] pwm: Call pwm_enable() before pwm_config() Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-08-23 14:19     ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-08-23 14:19     ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-08-23 14:19     ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-08-23 15:43     ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2012-08-23 15:43       ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2012-08-23 15:43       ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2012-08-23 16:57       ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-08-23 16:57         ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-08-23 16:57         ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-08-23 16:57         ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-08-23 17:12         ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2012-08-23 17:12           ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2012-08-23 17:12           ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2012-08-23 17:19           ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2012-08-23 17:19             ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2012-08-23 17:19             ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2012-08-23 19:04             ` Thierry Reding
2012-08-23 19:04               ` Thierry Reding
2012-08-23 19:04               ` Thierry Reding
2012-09-20 19:05               ` Mark Brown [this message]
2012-09-20 19:05                 ` Mark Brown
2012-09-20 19:05                 ` Mark Brown
2012-08-23 19:11           ` Thierry Reding
2012-08-23 19:11             ` Thierry Reding
2012-08-23 19:11             ` Thierry Reding
2012-08-23 20:58             ` [PATCH] pwm-imx: Fix config / enable / disable Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-08-23 21:03               ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-08-23 21:03               ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-08-23 21:03               ` Benoît Thébaudeau
2012-08-28  7:37               ` Sascha Hauer
2012-08-28  7:37                 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-08-28  7:37                 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-08-28  7:37                 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-09-20 19:03           ` [PATCH] pwm: Call pwm_enable() before pwm_config() Mark Brown
2012-09-20 19:03             ` Mark Brown
2012-09-20 19:03             ` Mark Brown
2012-08-30  7:10       ` Jingoo Han
2012-08-30  7:10         ` Jingoo Han
2012-08-30  7:10         ` Jingoo Han

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120920190544.GB13264@sirena.org.uk \
    --to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=FlorianSchandinat@gmx.de \
    --cc=benoit.thebaudeau@advansee.com \
    --cc=bryan.wu@canonical.com \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-leds@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rpurdie@rpsys.net \
    --cc=thierry.reding@avionic-design.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.