All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@willdeacon.co.uk>,
	Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <Dietmar.Eggemann@arm.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: hw_breakpoint: Enable debug powerdown only if system supports 'has_ossr'
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 10:28:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130319102803.GB22452@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5148082A.3060503@ti.com>

On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 06:39:38AM +0000, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> On Monday 18 March 2013 10:36 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> > Any chance you could follow up with your firmware/hardware guys about this
> > please? I'd really like to understand how we end up in this state in case we
> > can do something in the architecture to stop it from happening in future.
> > 
> I will check on this part and update you when I hear from them.

Ok, thanks.

Dietmar -- I seem to remember that you thought GDB did actually work with
hardware breakpoints on Pandaboard across low-power states. Can you
confirm/deny this please?

> > Well, we could just add the warn_once prints but that doesn't stop debug
> > from breaking after the first pm/suspend/hotplug operation.
> > 
> Probably we should drop the $subject patch approach and use warn_once
> at least for current rc. Ofcourse it doesn't help to get working
> hw_breakpoint support. Patch end of the email with warn_once.

Yeah, I'll merge that, but it's a real shame that this breaks hardware debug
on one of the few platforms where it was reported to work.

Will

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: hw_breakpoint: Enable debug powerdown only if system supports 'has_ossr'
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 10:28:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130319102803.GB22452@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5148082A.3060503@ti.com>

On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 06:39:38AM +0000, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> On Monday 18 March 2013 10:36 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> > Any chance you could follow up with your firmware/hardware guys about this
> > please? I'd really like to understand how we end up in this state in case we
> > can do something in the architecture to stop it from happening in future.
> > 
> I will check on this part and update you when I hear from them.

Ok, thanks.

Dietmar -- I seem to remember that you thought GDB did actually work with
hardware breakpoints on Pandaboard across low-power states. Can you
confirm/deny this please?

> > Well, we could just add the warn_once prints but that doesn't stop debug
> > from breaking after the first pm/suspend/hotplug operation.
> > 
> Probably we should drop the $subject patch approach and use warn_once
> at least for current rc. Ofcourse it doesn't help to get working
> hw_breakpoint support. Patch end of the email with warn_once.

Yeah, I'll merge that, but it's a real shame that this breaks hardware debug
on one of the few platforms where it was reported to work.

Will

  reply	other threads:[~2013-03-19 10:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-13  6:52 [PATCH] ARM: hw_breakpoint: Enable debug powerdown only if system supports 'has_ossr' Lokesh Vutla
2013-03-13  6:52 ` Lokesh Vutla
2013-03-13  6:52 ` Lokesh Vutla
2013-03-13 12:05 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2013-03-13 12:05   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2013-03-13 12:05   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2013-03-13 12:29   ` Lokesh Vutla
2013-03-13 12:29     ` Lokesh Vutla
2013-03-13 12:29     ` Lokesh Vutla
2013-03-14  7:38     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-03-14  7:38       ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-03-14  7:38       ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-03-15  5:00       ` Will Deacon
2013-03-15  5:00         ` Will Deacon
2013-03-18  6:51         ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-03-18  6:51           ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-03-18  6:51           ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-03-18 15:07           ` Will Deacon
2013-03-18 15:07             ` Will Deacon
2013-03-18 15:07             ` Will Deacon
2013-03-18 15:46             ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-03-18 15:46               ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-03-18 15:46               ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-03-18 17:06               ` Will Deacon
2013-03-18 17:06                 ` Will Deacon
2013-03-18 17:06                 ` Will Deacon
2013-03-19  6:39                 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-03-19  6:39                   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-03-19  6:39                   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-03-19 10:28                   ` Will Deacon [this message]
2013-03-19 10:28                     ` Will Deacon
2013-03-19 10:28                     ` Will Deacon
2013-03-25  9:11                     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-03-25  9:11                       ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-03-25  9:11                       ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-03-25 10:49                       ` Will Deacon
2013-03-25 10:49                         ` Will Deacon
2013-03-25 10:49                         ` Will Deacon
2013-03-25 10:55                         ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-03-25 10:55                           ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-03-25 10:55                           ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-03-28 11:59                     ` Dietmar Eggemann
2013-03-28 11:59                       ` Dietmar Eggemann
2013-03-28 11:59                       ` Dietmar Eggemann
2013-03-14 17:38 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-03-14 17:38   ` Kevin Hilman
2013-03-14 17:38   ` Kevin Hilman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130319102803.GB22452@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=Dietmar.Eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lokeshvutla@ti.com \
    --cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
    --cc=will@willdeacon.co.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.