All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: rjw@sisk.pl, robin.randhawa@arm.com, Steve.Bannister@arm.com,
	Liviu.Dudau@arm.com, charles.garcia-tobin@arm.com,
	arvind.chauhan@arm.com, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, patches@linaro.org,
	Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
	linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/18] cpufreq: sh: move cpufreq driver to drivers/cpufreq
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 02:12:36 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130410021236.GK11105@verge.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKohpomqfVqiw1PJxBRRA8=A6hV_63AW4nRpM8TfZPA5bypcKQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 07:42:51PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 9 April 2013 18:25, Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 06:24:22PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> >> This patch moves cpufreq driver of SUPERH architecture to drivers/cpufreq.
> >
> > Why?
> >
> > I am missing the cover email where I assume the explanation lies.
> 
> Hi Simon,
> 
> The idea was to keep all cpufreq drivers at a common and most suitable
> place, so that future consolidation work can be done easily and efficiently.
> 
> So, functionally this patch shouldn't change anything.

Thanks, I understand.

I have no objections to this, but Paul should probably review it.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: rjw@sisk.pl, robin.randhawa@arm.com, Steve.Bannister@arm.com,
	Liviu.Dudau@arm.com, charles.garcia-tobin@arm.com,
	arvind.chauhan@arm.com, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, patches@linaro.org,
	Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
	linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/18] cpufreq: sh: move cpufreq driver to drivers/cpufreq
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:12:36 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130410021236.GK11105@verge.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKohpomqfVqiw1PJxBRRA8=A6hV_63AW4nRpM8TfZPA5bypcKQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 07:42:51PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 9 April 2013 18:25, Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 06:24:22PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> >> This patch moves cpufreq driver of SUPERH architecture to drivers/cpufreq.
> >
> > Why?
> >
> > I am missing the cover email where I assume the explanation lies.
> 
> Hi Simon,
> 
> The idea was to keep all cpufreq drivers at a common and most suitable
> place, so that future consolidation work can be done easily and efficiently.
> 
> So, functionally this patch shouldn't change anything.

Thanks, I understand.

I have no objections to this, but Paul should probably review it.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-10  2:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 110+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-04 12:54 [PATCH 00/18] For-3.10: CPUFreq: Move drivers to drivers/cpufreq Viresh Kumar
2013-04-04 12:54 ` [PATCH 01/18] cpufreq: ARM: Arrange drivers in alphabetical order Viresh Kumar
2013-04-04 12:54   ` Viresh Kumar
2013-04-04 12:54 ` [PATCH 02/18] cpufreq: tegra: Move driver to drivers/cpufreq Viresh Kumar
2013-04-04 12:54   ` Viresh Kumar
2013-04-04 12:54 ` [PATCH 03/18] cpufreq: davinci: move cpufreq " Viresh Kumar
2013-04-04 12:54   ` Viresh Kumar
2013-04-04 12:54 ` [PATCH 04/18] cpufreq: pxa3xx: " Viresh Kumar
2013-04-04 12:54   ` Viresh Kumar
2013-04-04 12:54 ` [PATCH 05/18] cpufreq: pxa2xx: " Viresh Kumar
2013-04-04 12:54   ` Viresh Kumar
2013-04-04 12:54 ` [PATCH 06/18] cpufreq: integrator: " Viresh Kumar
2013-04-04 12:54   ` Viresh Kumar
2013-04-04 12:54 ` [PATCH 07/18] cpufreq: s3c24xx: " Viresh Kumar
2013-04-04 12:54   ` Viresh Kumar
2013-04-05  6:48   ` Kukjin Kim
2013-04-05  6:48     ` Kukjin Kim
2013-04-05  7:06     ` Viresh Kumar
2013-04-05  7:06       ` Viresh Kumar
2013-04-05 11:36       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-04-05 11:36         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-04-05 11:36         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-04-08  9:15         ` Kukjin Kim
2013-04-08  9:15           ` Kukjin Kim
2013-04-08  9:18           ` Viresh Kumar
2013-04-08  9:18             ` Viresh Kumar
2013-04-08 10:46           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-04-08 10:46             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-04-08 10:41             ` Kukjin Kim
2013-04-08 10:41               ` Kukjin Kim
2013-04-23 15:25         ` Kukjin Kim
2013-04-23 15:25           ` Kukjin Kim
2013-04-23 15:25           ` Kukjin Kim
2013-04-23 22:59           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-04-23 22:59             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-04-25 16:48             ` Kukjin Kim
2013-04-25 16:48               ` Kukjin Kim
2013-04-25 18:12               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-04-25 18:12                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-04-25 18:12                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-13  6:05           ` Viresh Kumar
2013-05-13  6:05             ` Viresh Kumar
2013-05-13  7:18             ` Why rpm_idle called in rpm_resume ? Feng Hong
2013-05-13 11:55               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-13 10:51             ` [PATCH 07/18] cpufreq: s3c24xx: move cpufreq driver to drivers/cpufreq Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-13 10:51               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-13 10:46               ` Viresh Kumar
2013-05-13 10:46                 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-05-14 12:36                 ` Kukjin Kim
2013-05-14 12:36                   ` Kukjin Kim
2013-05-14 13:00                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-14 13:00                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-05-20  5:29                     ` Viresh Kumar
2013-05-20  5:29                       ` Viresh Kumar
2013-05-20 13:47                       ` Kukjin Kim
2013-05-20 13:47                         ` Kukjin Kim
2013-04-08  4:54       ` Viresh Kumar
2013-04-08  4:54         ` Viresh Kumar
2013-04-04 12:54 ` [PATCH 08/18] cpufreq: sa11x0: " Viresh Kumar
2013-04-04 12:54   ` Viresh Kumar
2013-04-04 12:54 ` [PATCH 09/18] cpufreq: AVR32: " Viresh Kumar
2013-04-04 12:54 ` [PATCH 10/18] cpufreq: blackfin: " Viresh Kumar
2013-04-04 12:54   ` Viresh Kumar
2013-04-04 12:54 ` [PATCH 11/18] cpufreq: cris: " Viresh Kumar
2013-04-04 12:54 ` [PATCH 12/18] cpufreq: ia64: " Viresh Kumar
2013-04-04 12:59   ` Viresh Kumar
2013-04-04 12:54 ` [PATCH 13/18] cpufreq: mips: " Viresh Kumar
2013-04-04 12:54 ` [PATCH 14/18] cpufreq: sh: " Viresh Kumar
2013-04-04 12:58   ` Viresh Kumar
2013-04-09 12:55   ` Simon Horman
2013-04-09 12:55     ` Simon Horman
2013-04-09 14:12     ` Viresh Kumar
2013-04-09 14:24       ` Viresh Kumar
2013-04-10  2:12       ` Simon Horman [this message]
2013-04-10  2:12         ` Simon Horman
2013-04-10  2:51         ` Viresh Kumar
2013-04-10  2:51           ` Viresh Kumar
2013-04-10  4:30           ` Simon Horman
2013-04-10  4:30             ` Simon Horman
2013-04-04 12:54 ` [PATCH 15/18] cpufreq: unicore2: " Viresh Kumar
2013-04-04 12:54 ` [PATCH 16/18] cpufreq: sparc: " Viresh Kumar
2013-04-04 12:58   ` Viresh Kumar
2013-04-04 12:54 ` [PATCH 17/18] cpufreq: powerpc: " Viresh Kumar
2013-04-04 12:54   ` Viresh Kumar
2013-04-05  6:46   ` Viresh Kumar
2013-04-05  6:46     ` Viresh Kumar
2013-04-09  8:35     ` Viresh Kumar
2013-04-09  8:35       ` Viresh Kumar
2013-04-22  6:49       ` Viresh Kumar
2013-04-22  6:49         ` Viresh Kumar
2013-05-13  6:04         ` Viresh Kumar
2013-05-13  6:04           ` Viresh Kumar
2013-05-20  4:40           ` Viresh Kumar
2013-05-20  4:40             ` Viresh Kumar
2013-05-31 10:50             ` Viresh Kumar
2013-05-31 10:50               ` Viresh Kumar
2013-06-07  5:18               ` Viresh Kumar
2013-06-07  5:18                 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-06-07 11:58                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-07 11:58                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-04-04 12:54 ` [PATCH 18/18] cpufreq: powerpc/platforms/cell: " Viresh Kumar
2013-04-04 12:54   ` Viresh Kumar
2013-04-04 13:02   ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-04 13:02     ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-04 13:50     ` Viresh Kumar
2013-04-04 13:50       ` Viresh Kumar
2013-04-04 14:48       ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-04 14:48         ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-04 22:36 ` [PATCH 00/18] For-3.10: CPUFreq: Move drivers " Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-04-05  1:17   ` Viresh Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130410021236.GK11105@verge.net.au \
    --to=horms@verge.net.au \
    --cc=Liviu.Dudau@arm.com \
    --cc=Steve.Bannister@arm.com \
    --cc=arvind.chauhan@arm.com \
    --cc=charles.garcia-tobin@arm.com \
    --cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=patches@linaro.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=robin.randhawa@arm.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.