All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>
To: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@samsung.com>,
	Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>,
	Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>,
	linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] clk: divider: add flag to limit possible dividers to even numbers
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 11:57:50 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130611185750.8816.82691@quantum> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201306111329.32749.heiko@sntech.de>

Quoting Heiko Stübner (2013-06-11 04:29:32)
> SoCs like the Rockchip Cortex-A9 ones contain divider some clocks
> that use the regular mechanisms for storage but allow only even
> dividers and 1 to be used.
> 
> Therefore add a flag that lets _is_valid_div limit the valid dividers
> to these values. _get_maxdiv is also adapted to return even values
> for the CLK_DIVIDER_ONE_BASED case.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/clk-divider.c    |   14 ++++++++++++--
>  include/linux/clk-provider.h |    2 ++
>  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c b/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c
> index ce5cfe9..bdee7cf 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c
> @@ -45,8 +45,16 @@ static unsigned int _get_table_maxdiv(const struct clk_div_table *table)
>  
>  static unsigned int _get_maxdiv(struct clk_divider *divider)
>  {
> -       if (divider->flags & CLK_DIVIDER_ONE_BASED)
> -               return div_mask(divider);
> +       if (divider->flags & CLK_DIVIDER_ONE_BASED) {
> +               unsigned int div = div_mask(divider);
> +
> +               /* decrease to even number */
> +               if (divider->flags & CLK_DIVIDER_EVEN)
> +                       div--;
> +
> +               return div;
> +       }
> +
>         if (divider->flags & CLK_DIVIDER_POWER_OF_TWO)
>                 return 1 << div_mask(divider);
>         if (divider->table)
> @@ -141,6 +149,8 @@ static bool _is_valid_div(struct clk_divider *divider, unsigned int div)
>                 return is_power_of_2(div);
>         if (divider->table)
>                 return _is_valid_table_div(divider->table, div);
> +       if (divider->flags & CLK_DIVIDER_EVEN && div != 1 && (div % 2) != 0)

Is it correct to check for 'div != 1' here?  Wouldn't that check only be
valid in the presence of CLK_DIVIDER_ONE_BASED?

Maybe something like this would be more correct:

	if (divider->flags & CLK_DIVIDER_EVEN && (div % 2) != 0) {
		if (divider->flags & CLK_DIVIDER_ONE_BASED && div == 1)
			return true;
		return false;
	}

Regards,
Mike

> +               return false;
>         return true;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/include/linux/clk-provider.h b/include/linux/clk-provider.h
> index 1ec14a7..bd52e52 100644
> --- a/include/linux/clk-provider.h
> +++ b/include/linux/clk-provider.h
> @@ -266,6 +266,7 @@ struct clk_div_table {
>   *   of this register, and mask of divider bits are in higher 16-bit of this
>   *   register.  While setting the divider bits, higher 16-bit should also be
>   *   updated to indicate changing divider bits.
> + * CLK_DIVIDER_EVEN - only allow even divider values
>   */
>  struct clk_divider {
>         struct clk_hw   hw;
> @@ -281,6 +282,7 @@ struct clk_divider {
>  #define CLK_DIVIDER_POWER_OF_TWO       BIT(1)
>  #define CLK_DIVIDER_ALLOW_ZERO         BIT(2)
>  #define CLK_DIVIDER_HIWORD_MASK                BIT(3)
> +#define CLK_DIVIDER_EVEN               BIT(4)
>  
>  extern const struct clk_ops clk_divider_ops;
>  struct clk *clk_register_divider(struct device *dev, const char *name,
> -- 
> 1.7.2.3

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: mturquette@linaro.org (Mike Turquette)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/7] clk: divider: add flag to limit possible dividers to even numbers
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 11:57:50 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130611185750.8816.82691@quantum> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201306111329.32749.heiko@sntech.de>

Quoting Heiko St?bner (2013-06-11 04:29:32)
> SoCs like the Rockchip Cortex-A9 ones contain divider some clocks
> that use the regular mechanisms for storage but allow only even
> dividers and 1 to be used.
> 
> Therefore add a flag that lets _is_valid_div limit the valid dividers
> to these values. _get_maxdiv is also adapted to return even values
> for the CLK_DIVIDER_ONE_BASED case.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/clk-divider.c    |   14 ++++++++++++--
>  include/linux/clk-provider.h |    2 ++
>  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c b/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c
> index ce5cfe9..bdee7cf 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c
> @@ -45,8 +45,16 @@ static unsigned int _get_table_maxdiv(const struct clk_div_table *table)
>  
>  static unsigned int _get_maxdiv(struct clk_divider *divider)
>  {
> -       if (divider->flags & CLK_DIVIDER_ONE_BASED)
> -               return div_mask(divider);
> +       if (divider->flags & CLK_DIVIDER_ONE_BASED) {
> +               unsigned int div = div_mask(divider);
> +
> +               /* decrease to even number */
> +               if (divider->flags & CLK_DIVIDER_EVEN)
> +                       div--;
> +
> +               return div;
> +       }
> +
>         if (divider->flags & CLK_DIVIDER_POWER_OF_TWO)
>                 return 1 << div_mask(divider);
>         if (divider->table)
> @@ -141,6 +149,8 @@ static bool _is_valid_div(struct clk_divider *divider, unsigned int div)
>                 return is_power_of_2(div);
>         if (divider->table)
>                 return _is_valid_table_div(divider->table, div);
> +       if (divider->flags & CLK_DIVIDER_EVEN && div != 1 && (div % 2) != 0)

Is it correct to check for 'div != 1' here?  Wouldn't that check only be
valid in the presence of CLK_DIVIDER_ONE_BASED?

Maybe something like this would be more correct:

	if (divider->flags & CLK_DIVIDER_EVEN && (div % 2) != 0) {
		if (divider->flags & CLK_DIVIDER_ONE_BASED && div == 1)
			return true;
		return false;
	}

Regards,
Mike

> +               return false;
>         return true;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/include/linux/clk-provider.h b/include/linux/clk-provider.h
> index 1ec14a7..bd52e52 100644
> --- a/include/linux/clk-provider.h
> +++ b/include/linux/clk-provider.h
> @@ -266,6 +266,7 @@ struct clk_div_table {
>   *   of this register, and mask of divider bits are in higher 16-bit of this
>   *   register.  While setting the divider bits, higher 16-bit should also be
>   *   updated to indicate changing divider bits.
> + * CLK_DIVIDER_EVEN - only allow even divider values
>   */
>  struct clk_divider {
>         struct clk_hw   hw;
> @@ -281,6 +282,7 @@ struct clk_divider {
>  #define CLK_DIVIDER_POWER_OF_TWO       BIT(1)
>  #define CLK_DIVIDER_ALLOW_ZERO         BIT(2)
>  #define CLK_DIVIDER_HIWORD_MASK                BIT(3)
> +#define CLK_DIVIDER_EVEN               BIT(4)
>  
>  extern const struct clk_ops clk_divider_ops;
>  struct clk *clk_register_divider(struct device *dev, const char *name,
> -- 
> 1.7.2.3

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-06-11 18:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-11 11:28 [PATCH v3 0/7] arm: add basic support for Rockchip Cortex-A9 SoCs Heiko Stübner
2013-06-11 11:28 ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-11 11:28 ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-11 11:29 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] clk: divider: add flag to limit possible dividers to even numbers Heiko Stübner
2013-06-11 11:29   ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-11 11:29   ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-11 11:51   ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-06-11 11:51     ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-06-11 11:51     ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-06-11 12:06     ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-11 12:06       ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-11 12:06       ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-11 12:37       ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-06-11 12:37         ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-06-11 12:37         ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-06-11 12:39         ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-06-11 12:39           ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-06-11 12:39           ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-06-11 18:57   ` Mike Turquette [this message]
2013-06-11 18:57     ` Mike Turquette
2013-06-11 19:23     ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-11 19:23       ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-11 19:23       ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-11 11:29 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] mmc: dw_mmc-pltfm: remove static from dw_mci_pltfm_remove Heiko Stübner
2013-06-11 11:29   ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-11 11:29   ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-11 11:30 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] mmc: dw_mmc-pltfm: move probe and remove below dt match table Heiko Stübner
2013-06-11 11:30   ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-11 11:30   ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-12  1:16   ` Seungwon Jeon
2013-06-12  1:16     ` Seungwon Jeon
2013-06-11 11:30 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] mmc: dw_mmc-pltfm: add Rockchip variant Heiko Stübner
2013-06-11 11:30   ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-11 11:30   ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-12  1:22   ` Seungwon Jeon
2013-06-12  1:22     ` Seungwon Jeon
2013-06-11 11:31 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] clk: add basic Rockchip rk3066a clock support Heiko Stübner
2013-06-11 11:31   ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-11 11:31   ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-11 20:06   ` Mike Turquette
2013-06-11 20:06     ` Mike Turquette
2013-06-12 22:45     ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-12 22:45       ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-12 22:45       ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-12 23:02       ` Olof Johansson
2013-06-12 23:02         ` Olof Johansson
2013-06-12 23:02         ` Olof Johansson
2013-06-12 23:40         ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-12 23:40           ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-12 23:40           ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-11 11:32 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] arm: add debug uarts for rockchip rk29xx and rk3xxx series Heiko Stübner
2013-06-11 11:32   ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-11 11:32   ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-11 11:32 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] arm: add basic support for Rockchip RK3066a boards Heiko Stübner
2013-06-11 11:32   ` Heiko Stübner
2013-06-11 11:32   ` Heiko Stübner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130611185750.8816.82691@quantum \
    --to=mturquette@linaro.org \
    --cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=cjb@laptop.org \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=jh80.chung@samsung.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=olof@lixom.net \
    --cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
    --cc=tgih.jun@samsung.com \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.