All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Dong Fang <yp.fangdong@gmail.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, jeff.liu@oracle.com,
	xuejiufei@huawei.com, shencanquan@huawei.com,
	ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fs/ocfs2: use list_for_each_entry() instead of list_for_each()
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 13:51:56 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130730105156.GE29160@mwanda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51F84172.50408@gmail.com>

On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 06:42:58PM -0400, Dong Fang wrote:
> On 07/29/2013 04:06 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> >Oh.  It appears that nothing changed between v1 and v2.  Only the CC
> >list.
> >
> >It's probably that the list moderation on ocfs2-devel was confusing
> >for non-native English speakers the patch submitter thought his
> >patch was dropped.
> >
> >Also mailing lists should have a white list so that I don't get the
> >message every single time.
> >
> >regards,
> >dan carpenter
> >
> hi, dan carpenter.
> 
> i am not a member of Ocfs2-devel mailing list, after i send this patch,
> it notice me "Your message to Ocfs2-devel awaits moderator approval".
> i subscribe this mailing list just now, do you think i need to resend
> this patch to Ocfs2-devel ?
> 
> thx very much.

No.  You don't need to subscribe or resend.  Your original patch
will be approved and go through after a small delay.

regards,
dan carpenter

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Dong Fang <yp.fangdong@gmail.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, jeff.liu@oracle.com,
	xuejiufei@huawei.com, shencanquan@huawei.com,
	ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH v2] fs/ocfs2: use list_for_each_entry() instead of list_for_each()
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 13:51:56 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130730105156.GE29160@mwanda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51F84172.50408@gmail.com>

On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 06:42:58PM -0400, Dong Fang wrote:
> On 07/29/2013 04:06 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> >Oh.  It appears that nothing changed between v1 and v2.  Only the CC
> >list.
> >
> >It's probably that the list moderation on ocfs2-devel was confusing
> >for non-native English speakers the patch submitter thought his
> >patch was dropped.
> >
> >Also mailing lists should have a white list so that I don't get the
> >message every single time.
> >
> >regards,
> >dan carpenter
> >
> hi, dan carpenter.
> 
> i am not a member of Ocfs2-devel mailing list, after i send this patch,
> it notice me "Your message to Ocfs2-devel awaits moderator approval".
> i subscribe this mailing list just now, do you think i need to resend
> this patch to Ocfs2-devel ?
> 
> thx very much.

No.  You don't need to subscribe or resend.  Your original patch
will be approved and go through after a small delay.

regards,
dan carpenter

  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-30 10:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-27 13:23 [PATCH v2] fs/ocfs2: use list_for_each_entry() instead of list_for_each() Dong Fang
2013-07-27 13:23 ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Dong Fang
2013-07-29  7:49 ` Dan Carpenter
2013-07-29  7:49   ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Dan Carpenter
2013-07-29  8:06   ` Dan Carpenter
2013-07-29  8:06     ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Dan Carpenter
2013-07-30 16:00     ` Dong Fang
2013-07-30 16:00       ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Dong Fang
2013-07-30  5:01       ` Jeff Liu
2013-07-30  5:01         ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Jeff Liu
2013-07-30 18:26         ` Dong Fang
2013-07-30 18:26           ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Dong Fang
2013-07-30 22:42     ` Dong Fang
2013-07-30 22:42       ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Dong Fang
2013-07-30 10:51       ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2013-07-30 10:51         ` Dan Carpenter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130730105156.GE29160@mwanda \
    --to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jeff.liu@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
    --cc=shencanquan@huawei.com \
    --cc=xuejiufei@huawei.com \
    --cc=yp.fangdong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.