All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>, arm@kernel.org
Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
	Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux ARM Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] ARM: OMAP2+: AM437x: L2 cache support
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 19:11:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140423181103.GO27282@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5356B2FB.5090205@ti.com>

On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 02:20:43PM -0400, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 April 2014 04:28 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> > This patch series adds L2 cache support for AM437x
> > and does some clean-ups for existing OMAP4 support
> > along the way (no functional changes). On OMAP4 Panda,
> > the Aux control value remains 0x7e470000 before and
> > after the series.
> > 
> > Tested on OMAP4 Panda and AM437x EPOS EVMs.
> > 
> > It is based on RMK's 75 patch series titled "l2c series" +
> > the patch contained in https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap@vger.kernel.org/msg103439.html
> > 
> > Sekhar Nori (3):
> >   ARM: OMAP2+: L2 cache: get rid of init call
> >   ARM: OMAP2+: L2 cache: git rid of redundant cache replacement policy
> >     setting
> >   ARM: OMAP2+: AM43x: L2 cache support
> > 
> For the whole series,
> Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>

Okay, as these depend on my series, I'll take them into my l2c branch,
which I'll be pushing into linux-next from this evening.

-- 
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: now at 9.7Mbps down 460kbps up... slowly
improving, and getting towards what was expected from it.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/3] ARM: OMAP2+: AM437x: L2 cache support
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 19:11:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140423181103.GO27282@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5356B2FB.5090205@ti.com>

On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 02:20:43PM -0400, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> On Tuesday 22 April 2014 04:28 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> > This patch series adds L2 cache support for AM437x
> > and does some clean-ups for existing OMAP4 support
> > along the way (no functional changes). On OMAP4 Panda,
> > the Aux control value remains 0x7e470000 before and
> > after the series.
> > 
> > Tested on OMAP4 Panda and AM437x EPOS EVMs.
> > 
> > It is based on RMK's 75 patch series titled "l2c series" +
> > the patch contained in https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap at vger.kernel.org/msg103439.html
> > 
> > Sekhar Nori (3):
> >   ARM: OMAP2+: L2 cache: get rid of init call
> >   ARM: OMAP2+: L2 cache: git rid of redundant cache replacement policy
> >     setting
> >   ARM: OMAP2+: AM43x: L2 cache support
> > 
> For the whole series,
> Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>

Okay, as these depend on my series, I'll take them into my l2c branch,
which I'll be pushing into linux-next from this evening.

-- 
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: now at 9.7Mbps down 460kbps up... slowly
improving, and getting towards what was expected from it.

  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-23 18:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-22  8:28 [PATCH v3 0/3] ARM: OMAP2+: AM437x: L2 cache support Sekhar Nori
2014-04-22  8:28 ` Sekhar Nori
2014-04-22  8:28 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] ARM: OMAP2+: L2 cache: get rid of init call Sekhar Nori
2014-04-22  8:28   ` Sekhar Nori
2014-04-22  8:28 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] ARM: OMAP2+: L2 cache: git rid of redundant cache replacement policy setting Sekhar Nori
2014-04-22  8:28   ` Sekhar Nori
2014-04-22  8:28 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] ARM: OMAP2+: AM43x: L2 cache support Sekhar Nori
2014-04-22  8:28   ` Sekhar Nori
2014-04-22 18:20 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] ARM: OMAP2+: AM437x: " Santosh Shilimkar
2014-04-22 18:20   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2014-04-23 18:11   ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2014-04-23 18:11     ` Russell King - ARM Linux

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140423181103.GO27282@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=arm@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nsekhar@ti.com \
    --cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.