All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5 v2 RESEND] fs: Fixes for removing xid bits and security labels
Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 09:13:10 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150504231310.GF21261@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1425379119-3773-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz>

On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 11:38:34AM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
>   Hello,
> 
>   warning in XFS made me look into detail into how clearing of suid / sgid
> bits and security labels is done. And I've spotted a few issues:
> 1) MS_NOSEC handling is broken - we set it after each file_remove_suid() call.
>    However we needn't have removed suid bit simply because we have
>    CAP_SYS_FSID and further writes to the file from processes without this
>    capability still need to clear the suid bit.
> 2) file_remove_suid() is a misnomer since it also handles removing of
>    security labels. It is even more confusing because should_remove_suid()
>    doesn't return whether file_remove_suid() is needed or not.
> 3) On truncate we do clear suid bits but not security labels. According to
>    documentation in include/linux/security.h that's a bug but please correct
>    me if I'm wrong.
> 4) ocfs2 doesn't clear security labels - hard to fix, I left it alone for now.
> 5) XFS didn't provide proper exclusion for clearing mode bits.
> 
>   This series aims at fixing above issues.
> 
>   Since v1 I have removed bogus patch changing inode_set_flags(), I have
> updated changelog of patch 4/5 to better explain why ->inode_killpriv should
> be called and I have included a fix for MS_NOSEC handling in this series.
> Al, can you please merge the patches? Thanks!

Hi Al + Jan,

What's happening with this patchset? If it's not going to be pulled
into the VFS, I'll just pull in a version of the XFS patch that
corrects the locking at this point...

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
	xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5 v2 RESEND] fs: Fixes for removing xid bits and security labels
Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 09:13:10 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150504231310.GF21261@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1425379119-3773-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz>

On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 11:38:34AM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
>   Hello,
> 
>   warning in XFS made me look into detail into how clearing of suid / sgid
> bits and security labels is done. And I've spotted a few issues:
> 1) MS_NOSEC handling is broken - we set it after each file_remove_suid() call.
>    However we needn't have removed suid bit simply because we have
>    CAP_SYS_FSID and further writes to the file from processes without this
>    capability still need to clear the suid bit.
> 2) file_remove_suid() is a misnomer since it also handles removing of
>    security labels. It is even more confusing because should_remove_suid()
>    doesn't return whether file_remove_suid() is needed or not.
> 3) On truncate we do clear suid bits but not security labels. According to
>    documentation in include/linux/security.h that's a bug but please correct
>    me if I'm wrong.
> 4) ocfs2 doesn't clear security labels - hard to fix, I left it alone for now.
> 5) XFS didn't provide proper exclusion for clearing mode bits.
> 
>   This series aims at fixing above issues.
> 
>   Since v1 I have removed bogus patch changing inode_set_flags(), I have
> updated changelog of patch 4/5 to better explain why ->inode_killpriv should
> be called and I have included a fix for MS_NOSEC handling in this series.
> Al, can you please merge the patches? Thanks!

Hi Al + Jan,

What's happening with this patchset? If it's not going to be pulled
into the VFS, I'll just pull in a version of the XFS patch that
corrects the locking at this point...

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-05-04 23:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-03 10:38 [PATCH 0/5 v2 RESEND] fs: Fixes for removing xid bits and security labels Jan Kara
2015-03-03 10:38 ` Jan Kara
2015-03-03 10:38 ` [PATCH 1/5] fs: Fix S_NOSEC handling Jan Kara
2015-03-03 10:38   ` Jan Kara
2015-03-03 10:38 ` [PATCH 2/5] fs: Rename file_remove_suid() to file_remove_privs() Jan Kara
2015-03-03 10:38   ` Jan Kara
2015-03-03 10:38 ` [PATCH 3/5] fs: Provide function telling whether file_remove_privs() will do anything Jan Kara
2015-03-03 10:38   ` Jan Kara
2015-03-03 10:38 ` [PATCH 4/5] fs: Call security_ops->inode_killpriv on truncate Jan Kara
2015-03-03 10:38   ` Jan Kara
2015-03-03 10:38 ` [PATCH 5/5] xfs: Correctly lock inode when removing suid and security marks Jan Kara
2015-03-03 10:38   ` Jan Kara
2015-03-03 21:34   ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-03 21:34     ` Dave Chinner
2015-04-14 16:54   ` Eric Sandeen
2015-04-14 16:54     ` Eric Sandeen
2015-04-14 23:03     ` Dave Chinner
2015-04-14 23:03       ` Dave Chinner
2015-05-04 23:13 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2015-05-04 23:13   ` [PATCH 0/5 v2 RESEND] fs: Fixes for removing xid bits and security labels Dave Chinner
2015-05-05  7:56   ` Jan Kara
2015-05-05  7:56     ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150504231310.GF21261@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.