All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk,
	boaz@plexistor.com, david@fromorbit.com,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de,
	ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org,
	benh@kernel.crashing.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, tj@kernel.org, paulus@samba.org,
	hpa@zytor.com, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, mingo@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/9] x86: support kmap_atomic_pfn_t() for persistent memory
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 11:03:35 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150610150334.GK2729@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150610121202.GA9190@lst.de>

On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 02:12:02PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Btw, I don't think this actually is safe without refcounting your kmap
> structure.
> 
> The driver model ->remove callback can be called at any time, which
> will ioremap the memory and remap the kmap structure.  But at this
> point a user might still be using it.

Won't the device data structures be pinned by the refcount on the bdev?

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk,
	boaz@plexistor.com, david@fromorbit.com,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de,
	ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com, linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org,
	benh@kernel.crashing.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, tj@kernel.org, paulus@samba.org,
	hpa@zytor.com, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, mingo@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/9] x86: support kmap_atomic_pfn_t() for persistent memory
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 11:03:35 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150610150334.GK2729@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150610121202.GA9190@lst.de>

On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 02:12:02PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Btw, I don't think this actually is safe without refcounting your kmap
> structure.
> 
> The driver model ->remove callback can be called at any time, which
> will ioremap the memory and remap the kmap structure.  But at this
> point a user might still be using it.

Won't the device data structures be pinned by the refcount on the bdev?

  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-10 15:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-05 21:19 [PATCH v4 0/9] introduce __pfn_t, evacuate struct page from sgls Dan Williams
2015-06-05 21:19 ` Dan Williams
2015-06-05 21:19 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] introduce __pfn_t for scatterlists and pmem Dan Williams
2015-06-05 21:19   ` Dan Williams
2015-06-05 21:37   ` Linus Torvalds
2015-06-05 21:37     ` Linus Torvalds
2015-06-05 22:12     ` Dan Williams
2015-06-05 22:12       ` Dan Williams
2015-06-05 21:19 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] x86: support kmap_atomic_pfn_t() for persistent memory Dan Williams
2015-06-05 21:19   ` Dan Williams
2015-06-09  6:50   ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-06-09  6:50     ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-06-10 12:12   ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-06-10 12:12     ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-06-10 15:03     ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2015-06-10 15:03       ` Matthew Wilcox
2015-06-10 15:11       ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-06-10 15:11         ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-06-10 15:36         ` Dan Williams
2015-06-10 15:36           ` Dan Williams
2015-06-10 16:11           ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-06-10 16:11             ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-06-10 16:17             ` Dan Williams
2015-06-10 16:17               ` Dan Williams
2015-06-05 21:19 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] dax: drop size parameter to ->direct_access() Dan Williams
2015-06-05 21:19   ` Dan Williams
2015-06-06 11:37   ` Matthew Wilcox
2015-06-06 11:37     ` Matthew Wilcox
2015-06-09  6:51   ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-06-09  6:51     ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-06-05 21:19 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] dax: fix mapping lifetime handling, convert to __pfn_t + kmap_atomic_pfn_t() Dan Williams
2015-06-05 21:19   ` Dan Williams
2015-06-06 11:58   ` Matthew Wilcox
2015-06-06 11:58     ` Matthew Wilcox
2015-08-07 23:54     ` Dan Williams
2015-08-07 23:54       ` Dan Williams
2015-06-08 16:29   ` Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)
2015-06-08 16:29     ` Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)
2015-06-08 16:36     ` Dan Williams
2015-06-08 16:36       ` Dan Williams
2015-06-09  6:55   ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-06-09  6:55     ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-06-05 21:19 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] dma-mapping: allow archs to optionally specify a ->map_pfn() operation Dan Williams
2015-06-05 21:19   ` Dan Williams
2015-06-05 21:19 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] scatterlist: use sg_phys() Dan Williams
2015-06-05 21:19   ` Dan Williams
2015-06-09  6:59   ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-06-09  6:59     ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-06-05 21:19 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] scatterlist: cleanup sg_chain() and sg_unmark_end() Dan Williams
2015-06-05 21:19   ` Dan Williams
2015-06-05 21:19 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] scatterlist: convert to __pfn_t Dan Williams
2015-06-05 21:19   ` Dan Williams
2015-06-05 21:19 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] x86: convert dma_map_ops to support mapping a __pfn_t Dan Williams
2015-06-05 21:19   ` Dan Williams
2015-06-09  6:58   ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-06-09  6:58     ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-06-09 13:47     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-06-05 21:23 ` [PATCH v4 0/9] introduce __pfn_t, evacuate struct page from sgls Dan Williams
2015-06-05 21:23   ` Dan Williams

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150610150334.GK2729@linux.intel.com \
    --to=willy@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=boaz@plexistor.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.