All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yaowei Bai <bywxiaobai@163.com>
To: Boaz Harrosh <ooo@electrozaur.com>
Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, bhalevy@primarydata.com,
	osd-dev@open-osd.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/17] fs/exofs: remove unnecessary new_valid_dev check
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 20:29:46 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151008122946.GB3711@bbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <560A9672.9@electrozaur.com>

On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 04:47:30PM +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> On 09/28/2015 04:43 PM, Yaowei Bai wrote:
> > As new_valid_dev always returns 1, so !new_valid_dev check is not
> > needed, remove it.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Yaowei Bai <bywxiaobai@163.com>
> 
> ACK-by: Boaz Harrosh <ooo@electrozaur.com>
> 
> Please submit this through some General tree like the vfs or mm-tree

Sorry for delay reply. There's something wrong with my mailbox and
i lost your last recent reply. And i just want to say i will follow
your advice to send this patchset to Morton and once he takes it i'll
send another patch to remove new_valid_dev() at all. Thanks.

Thanks
Bai

> 
> Thanks
> Boaz
> 
> > ---
> >  fs/exofs/namei.c | 3 ---
> >  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/exofs/namei.c b/fs/exofs/namei.c
> > index 09a6bb1..994e078 100644
> > --- a/fs/exofs/namei.c
> > +++ b/fs/exofs/namei.c
> > @@ -80,9 +80,6 @@ static int exofs_mknod(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, umode_t mode,
> >  	struct inode *inode;
> >  	int err;
> >  
> > -	if (!new_valid_dev(rdev))
> > -		return -EINVAL;
> > -
> >  	inode = exofs_new_inode(dir, mode);
> >  	err = PTR_ERR(inode);
> >  	if (!IS_ERR(inode)) {
> > 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-10-08 12:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-28 13:26 [PATCH 00/17] cleanups of fs about new/huge_valid_dev Yaowei Bai
2015-09-28 13:29 ` [PATCH 01/17] fs/kdev_t: remove unused huge_valid_dev function Yaowei Bai
2015-09-28 13:29   ` [PATCH 02/17] fs/kdev_t: old/new_valid_dev can be boolean Yaowei Bai
2015-09-28 13:34 ` [PATCH 03/17] fs/vfs: remove unnecessary new_valid_dev check Yaowei Bai
2015-09-28 13:39 ` [PATCH 04/17] fs/btrfs: " Yaowei Bai
2015-09-29 14:55   ` David Sterba
2015-09-28 13:43 ` [PATCH 05/17] fs/exofs: " Yaowei Bai
2015-09-29 13:47   ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-09-29 15:46     ` Yaowei Bai
2015-09-30 10:26       ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-10-08 12:29     ` Yaowei Bai [this message]
2015-09-28 13:47 ` [PATCH 06/17] fs/ext2: " Yaowei Bai
2015-09-28 13:50 ` [PATCH 07/17] fs/ext4: " Yaowei Bai
2015-10-29 18:09   ` Theodore Ts'o
2015-10-30  1:38     ` Yaowei Bai
2015-09-28 13:55 ` [PATCH 08/17] fs/f2fs: " Yaowei Bai
2015-09-28 13:55   ` Yaowei Bai
2015-09-28 14:11 ` [PATCH 09/17] fs/hpfs: " Yaowei Bai
2015-09-29 15:03   ` Mikulas Patocka
2015-09-30 11:13     ` Yaowei Bai
2015-10-01 20:49       ` Mikulas Patocka
2015-10-08 12:22         ` Yaowei Bai
2015-09-28 14:15 ` [PATCH 10/17] fs/jffs2: " Yaowei Bai
2015-09-28 23:20   ` Brian Norris
2015-09-28 14:18 ` [PATCH 11/17] fs/jfs: " Yaowei Bai
2015-09-28 15:42   ` [Jfs-discussion] " Dave Kleikamp
2015-09-28 14:21 ` [PATCH 06/17] fs/ext2: " Yaowei Bai
2015-09-28 14:25 ` [PATCH 12/17] fs/ncpfs: " Yaowei Bai
2015-09-28 14:30 ` [PATCH 13/17] fs/nfs: " Yaowei Bai
2015-09-28 14:30   ` Yaowei Bai
2015-09-28 14:33 ` [PATCH 14/17] fs/nilfs2: " Yaowei Bai
2015-09-29 14:51   ` Ryusuke Konishi
2015-09-29 14:51     ` Ryusuke Konishi
2015-09-28 14:47 ` [PATCH 15/17] fs/reiserfs: " Yaowei Bai
2015-09-28 14:50 ` [PATCH 16/17] fs/stat: " Yaowei Bai
2015-09-28 14:53 ` [PATCH 17/17] fs/ubifs: " Yaowei Bai
2015-09-28 19:20   ` Richard Weinberger
2015-09-29 13:43     ` Yaowei Bai
2015-09-29 13:57 ` [PATCH] " Yaowei Bai
2015-09-30  8:11   ` Richard Weinberger
2015-10-01 13:35     ` Artem Bityutskiy
2015-10-01 13:35       ` Artem Bityutskiy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151008122946.GB3711@bbox \
    --to=bywxiaobai@163.com \
    --cc=bhalevy@primarydata.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ooo@electrozaur.com \
    --cc=osd-dev@open-osd.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.