All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>,
	Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>, Arun Sharma <asharma@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/virtio: use %llu format string form atomic64_t
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 11:37:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151019093700.GC2092@linux-mips.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5152101.mD2bWzUJ2V@wuerfel>

On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 01:23:07PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

> > I haven't checked all architectures, but I assume what happens is that
> > 64-bit ones just #define atomic64_t atomic_long_t, so they don't have
> > to provide three sets of functions.
> 
> scratch that, I just looked at all the architectures and found that it's
> just completely arbitrary, even within one architecture you get a mix
> of 'long' and 'long long', plus this gem from MIPS:
> 
> static __inline__ int atomic64_add_unless(atomic64_t *v, long a, long u)
> 
> which truncates the result to 32 bit.

Eh...  The result is 0/1 so nothing is truncated.  Alpha, MIPS,
PARISC and PowerPC are using the same prototype and x86 only differs
in the use of inline instead __inline__.  And anyway, that function on
MIPS is only built for CONFIG_64BIT.

What's wrong on MIPS is the comment describing the function's return value
which was changed by f24219b4e90cf70ec4a211b17fbabc725a0ddf3c (atomic: move
atomic_add_unless to generic code) and I've queued up a patch to fix that
since a few days.  I guess that was a cut and paste error from
__atomic_add_unless which indeed does return the old value.

  Ralf

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: ralf@linux-mips.org (Ralf Baechle)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] drm/virtio: use %llu format string form atomic64_t
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 11:37:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151019093700.GC2092@linux-mips.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5152101.mD2bWzUJ2V@wuerfel>

On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 01:23:07PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

> > I haven't checked all architectures, but I assume what happens is that
> > 64-bit ones just #define atomic64_t atomic_long_t, so they don't have
> > to provide three sets of functions.
> 
> scratch that, I just looked at all the architectures and found that it's
> just completely arbitrary, even within one architecture you get a mix
> of 'long' and 'long long', plus this gem from MIPS:
> 
> static __inline__ int atomic64_add_unless(atomic64_t *v, long a, long u)
> 
> which truncates the result to 32 bit.

Eh...  The result is 0/1 so nothing is truncated.  Alpha, MIPS,
PARISC and PowerPC are using the same prototype and x86 only differs
in the use of inline instead __inline__.  And anyway, that function on
MIPS is only built for CONFIG_64BIT.

What's wrong on MIPS is the comment describing the function's return value
which was changed by f24219b4e90cf70ec4a211b17fbabc725a0ddf3c (atomic: move
atomic_add_unless to generic code) and I've queued up a patch to fix that
since a few days.  I guess that was a cut and paste error from
__atomic_add_unless which indeed does return the old value.

  Ralf

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-10-19  9:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-07 10:41 [PATCH] drm/virtio: use %llu format string form atomic64_t Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-07 10:41 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-07 10:41 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-07 10:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-10-07 10:45   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-10-07 10:45   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-10-07 11:04   ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-07 11:04     ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-07 11:04     ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-07 11:23     ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-07 11:23     ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-07 11:23       ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-19  7:34       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-10-19  7:34       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-10-19  7:34         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-10-19  7:34         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-10-19  7:34         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-10-19 10:11         ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-19 10:11           ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-19 10:11           ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-19 10:39           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-10-19 10:39           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-10-19 10:39             ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-10-19 10:39             ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-10-19 10:39             ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-10-19  9:37       ` Ralf Baechle
2015-10-19  9:37       ` Ralf Baechle [this message]
2015-10-19  9:37         ` Ralf Baechle
2015-10-19 10:06         ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-19 10:06           ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-19 10:06           ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-19 10:06         ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-07 11:04   ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-10-07 10:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-10-07 10:41 Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151019093700.GC2092@linux-mips.org \
    --to=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=airlied@redhat.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=asharma@fb.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.