All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Jiada Wang <jiada_wang@mentor.com>
Cc: <lgirdwood@gmail.com>, <broonie@kernel.org>, <perex@perex.cz>,
	<tiwai@suse.com>, <patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	<alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: Codec: wm8962: declare ALC Coefficients as 4 separate registers
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 09:59:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151020085908.GB10520@ck-lbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1445309232-24094-3-git-send-email-jiada_wang@mentor.com>

On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 11:47:12AM +0900, Jiada Wang wrote:
> As ALC2 register is volatile, declare it as one of ALC Coefficients
> register together with other non-volatile registers will cause issue,
> in case wm8962 has enter suspend mode, and cache_only flag is set,
> any attempt to read from ALC2 will fail.
> 
> Instead of declaring one ALC Coefficients register which contains
> ALC1 ~ ALC3 and Noise Gate, this patch declares 4 separate registers,
> so that regmap can handle these registers differently based on their
> classification.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jiada Wang <jiada_wang@mentor.com>
> ---
>  sound/soc/codecs/wm8962.c | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8962.c b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8962.c
> index a3d7778..157530c 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8962.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8962.c
> @@ -1782,8 +1782,11 @@ SND_SOC_BYTES("HD Bass Coefficients", WM8962_HDBASS_AI_1, 30),
>  
>  SOC_DOUBLE("ALC Switch", WM8962_ALC1, WM8962_ALCL_ENA_SHIFT,
>  		WM8962_ALCR_ENA_SHIFT, 1, 0),
> -SND_SOC_BYTES_MASK("ALC Coefficients", WM8962_ALC1, 4,
> +SND_SOC_BYTES_MASK("ALC1", WM8962_ALC1, 1,
>  		WM8962_ALCL_ENA_MASK | WM8962_ALCR_ENA_MASK),
> +SND_SOC_BYTES("ALC2", WM8962_ALC2, 1),
> +SND_SOC_BYTES("ALC3", WM8962_ALC3, 1),
> +SND_SOC_BYTES("Noise Gate", WM8962_NOISE_GATE, 1),

This doesn't really seem ideal to be changing the interface at
this point in the drivers life.

Looking through the datasheet/driver there are 5 status bits in
the ALC2 register but we don't use them anywhere in the driver
and they don't look like they are likely to be useful to the end
user. I wonder if an easier solution might just be to have the
register be non-volatile?

Thanks,
Charles

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Jiada Wang <jiada_wang@mentor.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, tiwai@suse.com,
	lgirdwood@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: Codec: wm8962: declare ALC Coefficients as 4 separate registers
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 09:59:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151020085908.GB10520@ck-lbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1445309232-24094-3-git-send-email-jiada_wang@mentor.com>

On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 11:47:12AM +0900, Jiada Wang wrote:
> As ALC2 register is volatile, declare it as one of ALC Coefficients
> register together with other non-volatile registers will cause issue,
> in case wm8962 has enter suspend mode, and cache_only flag is set,
> any attempt to read from ALC2 will fail.
> 
> Instead of declaring one ALC Coefficients register which contains
> ALC1 ~ ALC3 and Noise Gate, this patch declares 4 separate registers,
> so that regmap can handle these registers differently based on their
> classification.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jiada Wang <jiada_wang@mentor.com>
> ---
>  sound/soc/codecs/wm8962.c | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8962.c b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8962.c
> index a3d7778..157530c 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8962.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8962.c
> @@ -1782,8 +1782,11 @@ SND_SOC_BYTES("HD Bass Coefficients", WM8962_HDBASS_AI_1, 30),
>  
>  SOC_DOUBLE("ALC Switch", WM8962_ALC1, WM8962_ALCL_ENA_SHIFT,
>  		WM8962_ALCR_ENA_SHIFT, 1, 0),
> -SND_SOC_BYTES_MASK("ALC Coefficients", WM8962_ALC1, 4,
> +SND_SOC_BYTES_MASK("ALC1", WM8962_ALC1, 1,
>  		WM8962_ALCL_ENA_MASK | WM8962_ALCR_ENA_MASK),
> +SND_SOC_BYTES("ALC2", WM8962_ALC2, 1),
> +SND_SOC_BYTES("ALC3", WM8962_ALC3, 1),
> +SND_SOC_BYTES("Noise Gate", WM8962_NOISE_GATE, 1),

This doesn't really seem ideal to be changing the interface at
this point in the drivers life.

Looking through the datasheet/driver there are 5 status bits in
the ALC2 register but we don't use them anywhere in the driver
and they don't look like they are likely to be useful to the end
user. I wonder if an easier solution might just be to have the
register be non-volatile?

Thanks,
Charles

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-20  9:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-20  2:47 [PATCH v2 0/2] *** wm8962 regmap related fix *** Jiada Wang
2015-10-20  2:47 ` Jiada Wang
2015-10-20  2:47 ` [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: WM8962: mark cache_dirty flag after software reset in pm_resume Jiada Wang
2015-10-20  2:47   ` Jiada Wang
2015-10-20  7:55   ` Charles Keepax
2015-10-20  7:55     ` Charles Keepax
2015-10-22 23:09   ` Applied "ASoC: wm8962: mark cache_dirty flag after software reset in pm_resume" to the asoc tree Mark Brown
2015-10-20  2:47 ` [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: Codec: wm8962: declare ALC Coefficients as 4 separate registers Jiada Wang
2015-10-20  2:47   ` Jiada Wang
2015-10-20  8:59   ` Charles Keepax [this message]
2015-10-20  8:59     ` Charles Keepax
2015-10-22 12:38   ` Mark Brown
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-10-06  7:06 [PATCH 0/2] *** wm8962 regmap related fix *** Jiada Wang
2015-10-06  7:06 ` [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: Codec: wm8962: declare ALC Coefficients as 4 separate registers Jiada Wang
2015-10-06  7:06   ` Jiada Wang
2015-10-06 11:01   ` Mark Brown
2015-10-08  3:11     ` Jiada Wang
2015-10-08  3:11       ` Jiada Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151020085908.GB10520@ck-lbox \
    --to=ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=jiada_wang@mentor.com \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=perex@perex.cz \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.