From: kbuild test robot <lkp-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: kbuild-all-JC7UmRfGjtg@public.gmane.org,
Jeff Layton <jlayton-vpEMnDpepFuMZCB2o+C8xQ@public.gmane.org>,
"J. Bruce Fields"
<bfields-uC3wQj2KruNg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>,
Alexander Viro
<viro-RmSDqhL/yNMiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org>,
Latchesar Ionkov <lucho-OnYtXJJ0/fesTnJN9+BGXg@public.gmane.org>,
linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Trond Myklebust
<trond.myklebust-7I+n7zu2hftEKMMhf/gKZA@public.gmane.org>,
devel-gWbeCf7V1WCQmaza687I9mD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org,
Yan Zheng <zyan-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
cluster-devel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
Sage Weil <sage-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos-sUDqSbJrdHQHWmgEVkV9KA@public.gmane.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>,
fuse-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org,
Christine Caulfield
<ccaulfie-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
v9fs-developer-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org,
Ilya Dryomov <idryomov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
linux-cifs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Eric Van Hensbergen
<ericvh-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Mark Fasheh <mfasheh-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>,
Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall-L2FTfq7BK8M@public.gmane.org>,
David Teigland <teigland-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Joel Becker <jlbec-aKy9MeLSZ9dg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>,
ceph-devel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Abdu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] locks: introduce locks_lock_inode_wait()
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 23:59:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201510222318.nNtSfkKO%fengguang.wu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <daf0d3941f34438c1fbdc94a5f3a47c2b22f3ee8.1445524157.git.bcodding-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2260 bytes --]
Hi Benjamin,
[auto build test ERROR on jlayton/linux-next -- if it's inappropriate base, please suggest rules for selecting the more suitable base]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Benjamin-Coddington/locks-introduce-locks_lock_inode_wait/20151022-233848
config: x86_64-allnoconfig (attached as .config)
reproduce:
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make ARCH=x86_64
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from include/linux/cgroup.h:17:0,
from include/linux/memcontrol.h:22,
from include/linux/swap.h:8,
from include/linux/suspend.h:4,
from arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.c:12:
>> include/linux/fs.h:1234:19: error: redefinition of 'locks_lock_file_wait'
static inline int locks_lock_file_wait(struct file *filp, struct file_lock *fl)
^
include/linux/fs.h:1181:19: note: previous definition of 'locks_lock_file_wait' was here
static inline int locks_lock_file_wait(struct file *filp, struct file_lock *fl)
^
include/linux/fs.h: In function 'locks_lock_file_wait':
>> include/linux/fs.h:1236:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'locks_lock_inode_wait' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
return locks_lock_inode_wait(file_inode(filp), fl);
^
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
make[2]: *** [arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.s] Error 1
make[2]: Target '__build' not remade because of errors.
make[1]: *** [prepare0] Error 2
make[1]: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
make: *** [sub-make] Error 2
vim +/locks_lock_file_wait +1234 include/linux/fs.h
1228
1229 static inline int flock_lock_file_wait(struct file *filp, struct file_lock *fl)
1230 {
1231 return flock_lock_inode_wait(file_inode(filp), fl);
1232 }
1233
> 1234 static inline int locks_lock_file_wait(struct file *filp, struct file_lock *fl)
1235 {
> 1236 return locks_lock_inode_wait(file_inode(filp), fl);
1237 }
1238
1239 struct fasync_struct {
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 6030 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@01.org, Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@ionkov.net>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>,
devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, Yan Zheng <zyan@redhat.com>,
cluster-devel@redhat.com, Sage Weil <sage@redhat.com>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
fuse-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Christine Caulfield <ccaulfie@redhat.com>,
v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net,
Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>,
linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org,
Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com>,
Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>,
Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>,
Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>,
David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>,
Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>,
ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, Abdul Hussain <habdul@visteon.com>,
Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
samba-technical@lists.samba.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Steve French <sfrench@samba.org>,
Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>,
Ron Minnich <rminnich@sandia.gov>,
Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@netapp.com>,
ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] locks: introduce locks_lock_inode_wait()
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 23:59:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201510222318.nNtSfkKO%fengguang.wu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <daf0d3941f34438c1fbdc94a5f3a47c2b22f3ee8.1445524157.git.bcodding@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2260 bytes --]
Hi Benjamin,
[auto build test ERROR on jlayton/linux-next -- if it's inappropriate base, please suggest rules for selecting the more suitable base]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Benjamin-Coddington/locks-introduce-locks_lock_inode_wait/20151022-233848
config: x86_64-allnoconfig (attached as .config)
reproduce:
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make ARCH=x86_64
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from include/linux/cgroup.h:17:0,
from include/linux/memcontrol.h:22,
from include/linux/swap.h:8,
from include/linux/suspend.h:4,
from arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.c:12:
>> include/linux/fs.h:1234:19: error: redefinition of 'locks_lock_file_wait'
static inline int locks_lock_file_wait(struct file *filp, struct file_lock *fl)
^
include/linux/fs.h:1181:19: note: previous definition of 'locks_lock_file_wait' was here
static inline int locks_lock_file_wait(struct file *filp, struct file_lock *fl)
^
include/linux/fs.h: In function 'locks_lock_file_wait':
>> include/linux/fs.h:1236:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'locks_lock_inode_wait' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
return locks_lock_inode_wait(file_inode(filp), fl);
^
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
make[2]: *** [arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.s] Error 1
make[2]: Target '__build' not remade because of errors.
make[1]: *** [prepare0] Error 2
make[1]: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
make: *** [sub-make] Error 2
vim +/locks_lock_file_wait +1234 include/linux/fs.h
1228
1229 static inline int flock_lock_file_wait(struct file *filp, struct file_lock *fl)
1230 {
1231 return flock_lock_inode_wait(file_inode(filp), fl);
1232 }
1233
> 1234 static inline int locks_lock_file_wait(struct file *filp, struct file_lock *fl)
1235 {
> 1236 return locks_lock_inode_wait(file_inode(filp), fl);
1237 }
1238
1239 struct fasync_struct {
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 6030 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org
Subject: [lustre-devel] [PATCH 1/3] locks: introduce locks_lock_inode_wait()
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 23:59:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201510222318.nNtSfkKO%fengguang.wu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <daf0d3941f34438c1fbdc94a5f3a47c2b22f3ee8.1445524157.git.bcodding@redhat.com>
Hi Benjamin,
[auto build test ERROR on jlayton/linux-next -- if it's inappropriate base, please suggest rules for selecting the more suitable base]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Benjamin-Coddington/locks-introduce-locks_lock_inode_wait/20151022-233848
config: x86_64-allnoconfig (attached as .config)
reproduce:
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make ARCH=x86_64
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from include/linux/cgroup.h:17:0,
from include/linux/memcontrol.h:22,
from include/linux/swap.h:8,
from include/linux/suspend.h:4,
from arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.c:12:
>> include/linux/fs.h:1234:19: error: redefinition of 'locks_lock_file_wait'
static inline int locks_lock_file_wait(struct file *filp, struct file_lock *fl)
^
include/linux/fs.h:1181:19: note: previous definition of 'locks_lock_file_wait' was here
static inline int locks_lock_file_wait(struct file *filp, struct file_lock *fl)
^
include/linux/fs.h: In function 'locks_lock_file_wait':
>> include/linux/fs.h:1236:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'locks_lock_inode_wait' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
return locks_lock_inode_wait(file_inode(filp), fl);
^
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
make[2]: *** [arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.s] Error 1
make[2]: Target '__build' not remade because of errors.
make[1]: *** [prepare0] Error 2
make[1]: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
make: *** [sub-make] Error 2
vim +/locks_lock_file_wait +1234 include/linux/fs.h
1228
1229 static inline int flock_lock_file_wait(struct file *filp, struct file_lock *fl)
1230 {
1231 return flock_lock_inode_wait(file_inode(filp), fl);
1232 }
1233
> 1234 static inline int locks_lock_file_wait(struct file *filp, struct file_lock *fl)
1235 {
> 1236 return locks_lock_inode_wait(file_inode(filp), fl);
1237 }
1238
1239 struct fasync_struct {
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: .config.gz
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 6030 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-devel-lustre.org/attachments/20151022/dabc38ad/attachment.obj>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 1/3] locks: introduce locks_lock_inode_wait()
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 23:59:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201510222318.nNtSfkKO%fengguang.wu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <daf0d3941f34438c1fbdc94a5f3a47c2b22f3ee8.1445524157.git.bcodding@redhat.com>
Hi Benjamin,
[auto build test ERROR on jlayton/linux-next -- if it's inappropriate base, please suggest rules for selecting the more suitable base]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Benjamin-Coddington/locks-introduce-locks_lock_inode_wait/20151022-233848
config: x86_64-allnoconfig (attached as .config)
reproduce:
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make ARCH=x86_64
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from include/linux/cgroup.h:17:0,
from include/linux/memcontrol.h:22,
from include/linux/swap.h:8,
from include/linux/suspend.h:4,
from arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.c:12:
>> include/linux/fs.h:1234:19: error: redefinition of 'locks_lock_file_wait'
static inline int locks_lock_file_wait(struct file *filp, struct file_lock *fl)
^
include/linux/fs.h:1181:19: note: previous definition of 'locks_lock_file_wait' was here
static inline int locks_lock_file_wait(struct file *filp, struct file_lock *fl)
^
include/linux/fs.h: In function 'locks_lock_file_wait':
>> include/linux/fs.h:1236:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'locks_lock_inode_wait' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
return locks_lock_inode_wait(file_inode(filp), fl);
^
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
make[2]: *** [arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.s] Error 1
make[2]: Target '__build' not remade because of errors.
make[1]: *** [prepare0] Error 2
make[1]: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors.
make: *** [sub-make] Error 2
vim +/locks_lock_file_wait +1234 include/linux/fs.h
1228
1229 static inline int flock_lock_file_wait(struct file *filp, struct file_lock *fl)
1230 {
1231 return flock_lock_inode_wait(file_inode(filp), fl);
1232 }
1233
> 1234 static inline int locks_lock_file_wait(struct file *filp, struct file_lock *fl)
1235 {
> 1236 return locks_lock_inode_wait(file_inode(filp), fl);
1237 }
1238
1239 struct fasync_struct {
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: .config.gz
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 6030 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/cluster-devel/attachments/20151022/dabc38ad/attachment.obj>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-22 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-22 15:35 [PATCH 0/3] Minor cleanup for locks API Benjamin Coddington
2015-10-22 15:35 ` [Cluster-devel] " Benjamin Coddington
2015-10-22 15:35 ` [lustre-devel] " Benjamin Coddington
2015-10-22 15:35 ` Benjamin Coddington
2015-10-22 15:35 ` Benjamin Coddington
2015-10-22 15:35 ` [PATCH 1/3] locks: introduce locks_lock_inode_wait() Benjamin Coddington
2015-10-22 15:35 ` [Cluster-devel] " Benjamin Coddington
2015-10-22 15:35 ` [lustre-devel] " Benjamin Coddington
2015-10-22 15:35 ` Benjamin Coddington
2015-10-22 15:35 ` Benjamin Coddington
[not found] ` <daf0d3941f34438c1fbdc94a5f3a47c2b22f3ee8.1445524157.git.bcodding-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2015-10-22 15:59 ` kbuild test robot [this message]
2015-10-22 15:59 ` [Cluster-devel] " kbuild test robot
2015-10-22 15:59 ` [lustre-devel] " kbuild test robot
2015-10-22 15:59 ` kbuild test robot
2015-10-22 16:21 ` Benjamin Coddington
2015-10-22 16:21 ` [Cluster-devel] " Benjamin Coddington
2015-10-22 16:21 ` [lustre-devel] " Benjamin Coddington
2015-10-22 16:21 ` Benjamin Coddington
2015-10-22 16:21 ` Benjamin Coddington
2015-10-22 15:35 ` [PATCH 2/3] Move locks API users to locks_lock_inode_wait() Benjamin Coddington
2015-10-22 15:35 ` [Cluster-devel] " Benjamin Coddington
2015-10-22 15:35 ` [lustre-devel] " Benjamin Coddington
2015-10-22 15:35 ` Benjamin Coddington
2015-10-22 15:35 ` Benjamin Coddington
2015-10-22 15:35 ` [PATCH 3/3] locks: cleanup posix_lock_inode_wait and flock_lock_inode_wait Benjamin Coddington
2015-10-22 15:35 ` [Cluster-devel] " Benjamin Coddington
2015-10-22 15:35 ` [lustre-devel] " Benjamin Coddington
2015-10-22 15:35 ` Benjamin Coddington
2015-10-22 15:35 ` Benjamin Coddington
2015-10-22 16:36 ` [RFC PATCH] locks: posix_lock_inode_wait() can be static kbuild test robot
2015-10-22 16:36 ` [Cluster-devel] " kbuild test robot
2015-10-22 16:36 ` [lustre-devel] " kbuild test robot
2015-10-22 16:36 ` kbuild test robot
2015-10-22 16:36 ` [PATCH 3/3] locks: cleanup posix_lock_inode_wait and flock_lock_inode_wait kbuild test robot
2015-10-22 16:36 ` [Cluster-devel] " kbuild test robot
2015-10-22 16:36 ` [lustre-devel] " kbuild test robot
2015-10-22 16:36 ` kbuild test robot
2015-10-22 16:36 ` kbuild test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201510222318.nNtSfkKO%fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--to=lkp-ral2jqcrhueavxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=Julia.Lawall-L2FTfq7BK8M@public.gmane.org \
--cc=bcodding-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=bfields-uC3wQj2KruNg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ccaulfie-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ceph-devel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=cluster-devel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=devel-gWbeCf7V1WCQmaza687I9mD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ericvh-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=fuse-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
--cc=hch-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=idryomov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jlayton-vpEMnDpepFuMZCB2o+C8xQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jlbec-aKy9MeLSZ9dg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kbuild-all-JC7UmRfGjtg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-cifs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=lucho-OnYtXJJ0/fesTnJN9+BGXg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mfasheh-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org \
--cc=miklos-sUDqSbJrdHQHWmgEVkV9KA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=oleg.drokin-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=sage-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=teigland-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust-7I+n7zu2hftEKMMhf/gKZA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=v9fs-developer-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
--cc=viro-RmSDqhL/yNMiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org \
--cc=zyan-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.