From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug 106241] New: shutdown(3)/close(3) behaviour is incorrect for sockets in accept(3)
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2015 21:51:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151031215116.GO22011@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFz9wm7LssaaUzmo-NYNGW88gb_TkUFSJoFJrY+fvtt8+A@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 02:23:31PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> The other stuff we probably can't do all that much about. Unless we
> decide to go for some complicated lockless optimistic file descriptor
> allocation scheme with retry-on-failure instead of locks. Which I'm
> sure is possible, but I'm equally sure is painful.
The interesting part is dup2() - we'd have to do something like
serialize against other dup2
was_claimed = atomically set and test bit in bitmap
if was_claimed
tofree = fdt->fd[fd];
if (!tofree)
fail with EBUSY
install into ->fd[...]
end of critical area
in there; __alloc_fd() could be made retry-on-failure, but I don't see
how to cope with dup2 vs. dup2 without an explicit exclusion.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-31 21:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 138+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-19 16:59 Fw: [Bug 106241] New: shutdown(3)/close(3) behaviour is incorrect for sockets in accept(3) Stephen Hemminger
2015-10-19 23:33 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-10-20 1:12 ` Alan Burlison
2015-10-20 1:45 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-10-20 9:59 ` Alan Burlison
2015-10-20 11:24 ` David Miller
2015-10-20 11:39 ` Alan Burlison
2015-10-20 13:19 ` Fw: " Eric Dumazet
2015-10-20 13:45 ` Alan Burlison
2015-10-20 15:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-10-20 18:31 ` Alan Burlison
2015-10-20 18:42 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-10-21 10:25 ` David Laight
2015-10-21 10:49 ` Alan Burlison
2015-10-21 11:28 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-10-21 13:03 ` Alan Burlison
2015-10-21 13:29 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-10-21 3:49 ` Al Viro
2015-10-21 14:38 ` Alan Burlison
2015-10-21 15:30 ` David Miller
2015-10-21 16:04 ` Casper.Dik
2015-10-21 21:18 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-10-21 21:28 ` Al Viro
2015-10-21 16:32 ` Fw: " Eric Dumazet
2015-10-21 18:51 ` Al Viro
2015-10-21 20:33 ` Casper.Dik
2015-10-22 4:21 ` Al Viro
2015-10-22 10:55 ` Alan Burlison
2015-10-22 18:16 ` Al Viro
2015-10-22 20:15 ` Alan Burlison
2015-11-02 10:03 ` David Laight
2015-11-02 10:29 ` Al Viro
2015-10-21 22:28 ` Alan Burlison
2015-10-22 1:29 ` David Miller
2015-10-22 4:17 ` Alan Burlison
2015-10-22 4:44 ` Al Viro
2015-10-22 6:03 ` Al Viro
2015-10-22 6:34 ` Casper.Dik
2015-10-22 17:21 ` Al Viro
2015-10-22 18:24 ` Casper.Dik
2015-10-22 19:07 ` Al Viro
2015-10-22 19:51 ` Casper.Dik
2015-10-22 21:57 ` Al Viro
2015-10-23 9:52 ` Casper.Dik
2015-10-23 13:02 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-10-23 13:20 ` Casper.Dik
2015-10-23 13:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-10-23 14:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-10-23 13:35 ` Alan Burlison
2015-10-23 14:21 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-10-23 15:46 ` Alan Burlison
2015-10-23 16:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-10-23 16:07 ` Alan Burlison
2015-10-23 16:19 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-10-23 16:40 ` Alan Burlison
2015-10-23 17:47 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-10-23 17:59 ` [PATCH net-next] af_unix: do not report POLLOUT on listeners Eric Dumazet
2015-10-25 13:45 ` David Miller
2015-10-24 2:30 ` [Bug 106241] New: shutdown(3)/close(3) behaviour is incorrect for sockets in accept(3) Al Viro
2015-10-27 9:08 ` Casper.Dik
2015-10-27 10:52 ` Alan Burlison
2015-10-27 12:01 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-10-27 12:27 ` Alan Burlison
2015-10-27 12:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-10-27 13:42 ` David Miller
2015-10-27 13:37 ` Alan Burlison
2015-10-27 13:59 ` David Miller
2015-10-27 14:13 ` Alan Burlison
2015-10-27 14:39 ` David Miller
2015-10-27 14:39 ` Alan Burlison
2015-10-27 15:04 ` David Miller
2015-10-27 15:53 ` Alan Burlison
2015-10-27 23:17 ` Al Viro
2015-10-28 0:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-10-28 12:35 ` Al Viro
2015-10-28 13:24 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-10-28 14:47 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-10-28 21:13 ` Al Viro
2015-10-28 21:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-10-28 22:33 ` Al Viro
2015-10-28 23:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-10-29 0:15 ` Al Viro
2015-10-29 3:29 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-10-29 4:16 ` Al Viro
2015-10-29 12:35 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-10-29 13:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-10-30 17:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-10-30 21:02 ` Al Viro
2015-10-30 21:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-10-30 21:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-10-30 22:33 ` Al Viro
2015-10-30 23:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-10-31 0:09 ` Al Viro
2015-10-31 15:59 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-10-31 19:34 ` Al Viro
2015-10-31 19:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-10-31 20:29 ` Al Viro
2015-11-02 0:24 ` Al Viro
2015-11-02 0:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-11-02 2:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-11-02 6:22 ` Al Viro
2015-10-31 20:45 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-10-31 21:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-10-31 21:51 ` Al Viro [this message]
2015-10-31 22:34 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-10-31 1:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-10-28 16:04 ` Alan Burlison
2015-10-29 14:58 ` David Holland
2015-10-29 15:18 ` Alan Burlison
2015-10-29 16:01 ` David Holland
2015-10-29 16:15 ` Alan Burlison
2015-10-29 17:07 ` Al Viro
2015-10-29 17:12 ` Alan Burlison
2015-10-30 1:54 ` David Miller
2015-10-30 1:55 ` David Miller
2015-10-30 5:44 ` David Holland
2015-10-30 17:43 ` David Laight
2015-10-30 21:09 ` Al Viro
2015-11-04 15:54 ` David Laight
2015-11-04 16:27 ` Al Viro
2015-11-06 15:07 ` David Laight
2015-11-06 19:31 ` Al Viro
2015-10-22 6:51 ` Casper.Dik
2015-10-22 11:18 ` Alan Burlison
2015-10-22 11:15 ` Alan Burlison
2015-10-22 6:15 ` Casper.Dik
2015-10-22 11:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-10-22 11:58 ` Alan Burlison
2015-10-22 12:10 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-10-22 13:12 ` David Miller
2015-10-22 13:14 ` Alan Burlison
2015-10-22 17:05 ` Al Viro
2015-10-22 17:39 ` Alan Burlison
2015-10-22 18:56 ` Al Viro
2015-10-22 19:50 ` Casper.Dik
2015-10-23 17:09 ` Al Viro
2015-10-23 18:30 ` Fw: " David Holland
2015-10-23 19:51 ` Al Viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151031215116.GO22011@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.