All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Vignesh R <vigneshr@ti.com>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
	Michal Suchanek <hramrach@gmail.com>,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] spi: introduce mmap read support for spi flash devices
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 14:39:15 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151104143915.GI1717@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1446545174-14193-2-git-send-email-vigneshr@ti.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 741 bytes --]

On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 03:36:10PM +0530, Vignesh R wrote:

> +	}
> +	mutex_lock(&master->mmap_lock_mutex);
> +	ret = master->spi_mtd_mmap_read(spi, from, len, retlen, buf,
> +					read_opcode, addr_width,
> +					dummy_bytes);
> +	mutex_unlock(&master->mmap_lock_mutex);
> +	if (master->auto_runtime_pm)
> +		pm_runtime_put(master->dev.parent);

It's a bit worrying that this doesn't sync with the message queue except
via the mutex: this means that we might be out of order with respect to
any asynchronous transfers that are happening on the device.  I'm not
sure that this is a practical problem, though there is some risk of
unfair scheduling that would have to be under extreme load and it might
make sense to prioritise reads anyway.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Brown <broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: Vignesh R <vigneshr-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony-4v6yS6AI5VpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
	Michal Suchanek
	<hramrach-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	Russell King <linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org>,
	devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
	linux-mtd-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
	linux-spi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] spi: introduce mmap read support for spi flash devices
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 14:39:15 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151104143915.GI1717@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1446545174-14193-2-git-send-email-vigneshr-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 741 bytes --]

On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 03:36:10PM +0530, Vignesh R wrote:

> +	}
> +	mutex_lock(&master->mmap_lock_mutex);
> +	ret = master->spi_mtd_mmap_read(spi, from, len, retlen, buf,
> +					read_opcode, addr_width,
> +					dummy_bytes);
> +	mutex_unlock(&master->mmap_lock_mutex);
> +	if (master->auto_runtime_pm)
> +		pm_runtime_put(master->dev.parent);

It's a bit worrying that this doesn't sync with the message queue except
via the mutex: this means that we might be out of order with respect to
any asynchronous transfers that are happening on the device.  I'm not
sure that this is a practical problem, though there is some risk of
unfair scheduling that would have to be under extreme load and it might
make sense to prioritise reads anyway.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: broonie@kernel.org (Mark Brown)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/5] spi: introduce mmap read support for spi flash devices
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 14:39:15 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151104143915.GI1717@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1446545174-14193-2-git-send-email-vigneshr@ti.com>

On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 03:36:10PM +0530, Vignesh R wrote:

> +	}
> +	mutex_lock(&master->mmap_lock_mutex);
> +	ret = master->spi_mtd_mmap_read(spi, from, len, retlen, buf,
> +					read_opcode, addr_width,
> +					dummy_bytes);
> +	mutex_unlock(&master->mmap_lock_mutex);
> +	if (master->auto_runtime_pm)
> +		pm_runtime_put(master->dev.parent);

It's a bit worrying that this doesn't sync with the message queue except
via the mutex: this means that we might be out of order with respect to
any asynchronous transfers that are happening on the device.  I'm not
sure that this is a practical problem, though there is some risk of
unfair scheduling that would have to be under extreme load and it might
make sense to prioritise reads anyway.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20151104/71e12d1f/attachment.sig>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-11-04 14:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-03 10:06 [PATCH v2 0/5] Add memory mapped read support for ti-qspi Vignesh R
2015-11-03 10:06 ` Vignesh R
2015-11-03 10:06 ` Vignesh R
2015-11-03 10:06 ` Vignesh R
2015-11-03 10:06 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] spi: introduce mmap read support for spi flash devices Vignesh R
2015-11-03 10:06   ` Vignesh R
2015-11-03 10:06   ` Vignesh R
2015-11-03 11:19   ` Michal Suchanek
2015-11-03 11:19     ` Michal Suchanek
2015-11-03 11:19     ` Michal Suchanek
2015-11-04  4:48     ` Vignesh R
2015-11-04  4:48       ` Vignesh R
2015-11-04  4:48       ` Vignesh R
2015-11-04  4:48       ` Vignesh R
2015-11-04  4:48       ` Vignesh R
2015-11-04 14:39   ` Mark Brown [this message]
2015-11-04 14:39     ` Mark Brown
2015-11-04 14:39     ` Mark Brown
2015-11-05 12:29     ` Vignesh R
2015-11-05 12:29       ` Vignesh R
2015-11-05 12:29       ` Vignesh R
2015-11-05 15:29       ` Mark Brown
2015-11-05 15:29         ` Mark Brown
2015-11-03 10:06 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] spi: spi-ti-qspi: add mmap mode read support Vignesh R
2015-11-03 10:06   ` Vignesh R
2015-11-03 10:06   ` Vignesh R
2015-11-04 14:41   ` Mark Brown
2015-11-04 14:41     ` Mark Brown
2015-11-04 14:41     ` Mark Brown
2015-11-05  6:16     ` Vignesh R
2015-11-05  6:16       ` Vignesh R
2015-11-05  6:16       ` Vignesh R
2015-11-05  6:16       ` Vignesh R
2015-11-03 10:06 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] mtd: devices: m25p80: add support for mmap read request Vignesh R
2015-11-03 10:06   ` Vignesh R
2015-11-03 10:06   ` Vignesh R
2015-11-03 10:06   ` Vignesh R
2015-11-03 10:06 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] ARM: dts: DRA7: add entry for qspi mmap region Vignesh R
2015-11-03 10:06   ` Vignesh R
2015-11-03 10:06   ` Vignesh R
2015-11-05 16:36   ` Rob Herring
2015-11-05 16:36     ` Rob Herring
2015-11-05 16:36     ` Rob Herring
2015-11-03 10:06 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] ARM: dts: AM4372: " Vignesh R
2015-11-03 10:06   ` Vignesh R
2015-11-03 10:06   ` Vignesh R
2015-11-05 23:51   ` Rob Herring
2015-11-05 23:51     ` Rob Herring
2015-11-05 23:51     ` Rob Herring
2015-11-06  5:14     ` Felipe Balbi
2015-11-06  5:14       ` Felipe Balbi
2015-11-06  5:14       ` Felipe Balbi
2015-11-06 12:21       ` Vignesh R
2015-11-06 12:21         ` Vignesh R
2015-11-06 12:21         ` Vignesh R

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151104143915.GI1717@sirena.org.uk \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hramrach@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.