All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] sparc, rwsem: drop superfluous arch specific implementation
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 11:06:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160406090638.GB24272@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160402011753.GB5329@linux-uzut.site>

[Redicing CC list]

On Fri 01-04-16 18:17:53, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Apr 2016, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> >arch/sh/include/asm/rwsem.h     | 14 ++------------
> >arch/xtensa/include/asm/rwsem.h | 14 ++------------
> >2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> 
> I think we can actually get rid of these files altogether.

And after double checking sparc is using the generic implementation
without any arch specific tweaks as well. So it can be dropped.

David, does the following look good to you or am I missing something?
I will drop "[PATCH 08/11] sparc, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable"
then.
---
>From 8a71514d2973f9e5c0330a23e0409d195e796b4c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 10:33:37 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] sparc, rwsem: drop superfluous arch specific implementation

sparc basically reuses generic implementation of rwsem so we can
reuse the code rather than duplicate it.

Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
---
 arch/sparc/include/asm/Kbuild  |   1 +
 arch/sparc/include/asm/rwsem.h | 119 -----------------------------------------
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 119 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 arch/sparc/include/asm/rwsem.h

diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/Kbuild b/arch/sparc/include/asm/Kbuild
index e928618838bc..6024c26c0585 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/Kbuild
+++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/Kbuild
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ generic-y += mm-arch-hooks.h
 generic-y += module.h
 generic-y += mutex.h
 generic-y += preempt.h
+generic-y += rwsem.h
 generic-y += serial.h
 generic-y += trace_clock.h
 generic-y += types.h
diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/rwsem.h b/arch/sparc/include/asm/rwsem.h
deleted file mode 100644
index e5a0d575bc7f..000000000000
--- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/rwsem.h
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,119 +0,0 @@
-/*
- * rwsem.h: R/W semaphores implemented using CAS
- *
- * Written by David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com), 2001.
- * Derived from asm-i386/rwsem.h
- */
-#ifndef _SPARC64_RWSEM_H
-#define _SPARC64_RWSEM_H
-
-#ifndef _LINUX_RWSEM_H
-#error "please don't include asm/rwsem.h directly, use linux/rwsem.h instead"
-#endif
-
-#ifdef __KERNEL__
-
-#define RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE		0x00000000L
-#define RWSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS		0x00000001L
-#define RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK		0xffffffffL
-#define RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS		(-RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK-1)
-#define RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS		RWSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS
-#define RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS		(RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS + RWSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS)
-
-/*
- * lock for reading
- */
-static inline void __down_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
-	if (unlikely(atomic64_inc_return((atomic64_t *)(&sem->count)) <= 0L))
-		rwsem_down_read_failed(sem);
-}
-
-static inline int __down_read_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
-	long tmp;
-
-	while ((tmp = sem->count) >= 0L) {
-		if (tmp == cmpxchg(&sem->count, tmp,
-				   tmp + RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS)) {
-			return 1;
-		}
-	}
-	return 0;
-}
-
-/*
- * lock for writing
- */
-static inline void __down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
-	long tmp;
-
-	tmp = atomic64_add_return(RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS,
-				  (atomic64_t *)(&sem->count));
-	if (unlikely(tmp != RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS))
-		rwsem_down_write_failed(sem);
-}
-
-static inline int __down_write_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
-	long tmp;
-
-	tmp = cmpxchg(&sem->count, RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE,
-		      RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS);
-	return tmp == RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE;
-}
-
-/*
- * unlock after reading
- */
-static inline void __up_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
-	long tmp;
-
-	tmp = atomic64_dec_return((atomic64_t *)(&sem->count));
-	if (unlikely(tmp < -1L && (tmp & RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK) == 0L))
-		rwsem_wake(sem);
-}
-
-/*
- * unlock after writing
- */
-static inline void __up_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
-	if (unlikely(atomic64_sub_return(RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS,
-					 (atomic64_t *)(&sem->count)) < 0L))
-		rwsem_wake(sem);
-}
-
-/*
- * implement atomic add functionality
- */
-static inline void rwsem_atomic_add(long delta, struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
-	atomic64_add(delta, (atomic64_t *)(&sem->count));
-}
-
-/*
- * downgrade write lock to read lock
- */
-static inline void __downgrade_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
-	long tmp;
-
-	tmp = atomic64_add_return(-RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS, (atomic64_t *)(&sem->count));
-	if (tmp < 0L)
-		rwsem_downgrade_wake(sem);
-}
-
-/*
- * implement exchange and add functionality
- */
-static inline long rwsem_atomic_update(long delta, struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
-	return atomic64_add_return(delta, (atomic64_t *)(&sem->count));
-}
-
-#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
-
-#endif /* _SPARC64_RWSEM_H */
-- 
2.8.0.rc3

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] sparc, rwsem: drop superfluous arch specific implementation
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 11:06:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160406090638.GB24272@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160402011753.GB5329@linux-uzut.site>

[Redicing CC list]

On Fri 01-04-16 18:17:53, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Apr 2016, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> >arch/sh/include/asm/rwsem.h     | 14 ++------------
> >arch/xtensa/include/asm/rwsem.h | 14 ++------------
> >2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> 
> I think we can actually get rid of these files altogether.

And after double checking sparc is using the generic implementation
without any arch specific tweaks as well. So it can be dropped.

David, does the following look good to you or am I missing something?
I will drop "[PATCH 08/11] sparc, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable"
then.
---
From 8a71514d2973f9e5c0330a23e0409d195e796b4c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 10:33:37 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] sparc, rwsem: drop superfluous arch specific implementation

sparc basically reuses generic implementation of rwsem so we can
reuse the code rather than duplicate it.

Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
---
 arch/sparc/include/asm/Kbuild  |   1 +
 arch/sparc/include/asm/rwsem.h | 119 -----------------------------------------
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 119 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 arch/sparc/include/asm/rwsem.h

diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/Kbuild b/arch/sparc/include/asm/Kbuild
index e928618838bc..6024c26c0585 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/Kbuild
+++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/Kbuild
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ generic-y += mm-arch-hooks.h
 generic-y += module.h
 generic-y += mutex.h
 generic-y += preempt.h
+generic-y += rwsem.h
 generic-y += serial.h
 generic-y += trace_clock.h
 generic-y += types.h
diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/rwsem.h b/arch/sparc/include/asm/rwsem.h
deleted file mode 100644
index e5a0d575bc7f..000000000000
--- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/rwsem.h
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,119 +0,0 @@
-/*
- * rwsem.h: R/W semaphores implemented using CAS
- *
- * Written by David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com), 2001.
- * Derived from asm-i386/rwsem.h
- */
-#ifndef _SPARC64_RWSEM_H
-#define _SPARC64_RWSEM_H
-
-#ifndef _LINUX_RWSEM_H
-#error "please don't include asm/rwsem.h directly, use linux/rwsem.h instead"
-#endif
-
-#ifdef __KERNEL__
-
-#define RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE		0x00000000L
-#define RWSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS		0x00000001L
-#define RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK		0xffffffffL
-#define RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS		(-RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK-1)
-#define RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS		RWSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS
-#define RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS		(RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS + RWSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS)
-
-/*
- * lock for reading
- */
-static inline void __down_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
-	if (unlikely(atomic64_inc_return((atomic64_t *)(&sem->count)) <= 0L))
-		rwsem_down_read_failed(sem);
-}
-
-static inline int __down_read_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
-	long tmp;
-
-	while ((tmp = sem->count) >= 0L) {
-		if (tmp == cmpxchg(&sem->count, tmp,
-				   tmp + RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS)) {
-			return 1;
-		}
-	}
-	return 0;
-}
-
-/*
- * lock for writing
- */
-static inline void __down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
-	long tmp;
-
-	tmp = atomic64_add_return(RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS,
-				  (atomic64_t *)(&sem->count));
-	if (unlikely(tmp != RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS))
-		rwsem_down_write_failed(sem);
-}
-
-static inline int __down_write_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
-	long tmp;
-
-	tmp = cmpxchg(&sem->count, RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE,
-		      RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS);
-	return tmp == RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE;
-}
-
-/*
- * unlock after reading
- */
-static inline void __up_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
-	long tmp;
-
-	tmp = atomic64_dec_return((atomic64_t *)(&sem->count));
-	if (unlikely(tmp < -1L && (tmp & RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK) == 0L))
-		rwsem_wake(sem);
-}
-
-/*
- * unlock after writing
- */
-static inline void __up_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
-	if (unlikely(atomic64_sub_return(RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS,
-					 (atomic64_t *)(&sem->count)) < 0L))
-		rwsem_wake(sem);
-}
-
-/*
- * implement atomic add functionality
- */
-static inline void rwsem_atomic_add(long delta, struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
-	atomic64_add(delta, (atomic64_t *)(&sem->count));
-}
-
-/*
- * downgrade write lock to read lock
- */
-static inline void __downgrade_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
-	long tmp;
-
-	tmp = atomic64_add_return(-RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS, (atomic64_t *)(&sem->count));
-	if (tmp < 0L)
-		rwsem_downgrade_wake(sem);
-}
-
-/*
- * implement exchange and add functionality
- */
-static inline long rwsem_atomic_update(long delta, struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
-	return atomic64_add_return(delta, (atomic64_t *)(&sem->count));
-}
-
-#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
-
-#endif /* _SPARC64_RWSEM_H */
-- 
2.8.0.rc3

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] sparc, rwsem: drop superfluous arch specific implementation
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 11:06:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160406090638.GB24272@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
Message-ID: <20160406090638.0rpyi1EyhlnjDGvEEZ_9yp4VGocHyqxwvGDmpZmJGqI@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160402011753.GB5329@linux-uzut.site>

[Redicing CC list]

On Fri 01-04-16 18:17:53, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Apr 2016, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> >arch/sh/include/asm/rwsem.h     | 14 ++------------
> >arch/xtensa/include/asm/rwsem.h | 14 ++------------
> >2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> 
> I think we can actually get rid of these files altogether.

And after double checking sparc is using the generic implementation
without any arch specific tweaks as well. So it can be dropped.

David, does the following look good to you or am I missing something?
I will drop "[PATCH 08/11] sparc, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable"
then.
---

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] sparc, rwsem: drop superfluous arch specific implementation
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 09:06:38 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160406090638.GB24272@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160402011753.GB5329@linux-uzut.site>

[Redicing CC list]

On Fri 01-04-16 18:17:53, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Apr 2016, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> >arch/sh/include/asm/rwsem.h     | 14 ++------------
> >arch/xtensa/include/asm/rwsem.h | 14 ++------------
> >2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> 
> I think we can actually get rid of these files altogether.

And after double checking sparc is using the generic implementation
without any arch specific tweaks as well. So it can be dropped.

David, does the following look good to you or am I missing something?
I will drop "[PATCH 08/11] sparc, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable"
then.
---
From 8a71514d2973f9e5c0330a23e0409d195e796b4c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 10:33:37 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] sparc, rwsem: drop superfluous arch specific implementation

sparc basically reuses generic implementation of rwsem so we can
reuse the code rather than duplicate it.

Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
---
 arch/sparc/include/asm/Kbuild  |   1 +
 arch/sparc/include/asm/rwsem.h | 119 -----------------------------------------
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 119 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 arch/sparc/include/asm/rwsem.h

diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/Kbuild b/arch/sparc/include/asm/Kbuild
index e928618838bc..6024c26c0585 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/Kbuild
+++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/Kbuild
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ generic-y += mm-arch-hooks.h
 generic-y += module.h
 generic-y += mutex.h
 generic-y += preempt.h
+generic-y += rwsem.h
 generic-y += serial.h
 generic-y += trace_clock.h
 generic-y += types.h
diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/rwsem.h b/arch/sparc/include/asm/rwsem.h
deleted file mode 100644
index e5a0d575bc7f..000000000000
--- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/rwsem.h
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,119 +0,0 @@
-/*
- * rwsem.h: R/W semaphores implemented using CAS
- *
- * Written by David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com), 2001.
- * Derived from asm-i386/rwsem.h
- */
-#ifndef _SPARC64_RWSEM_H
-#define _SPARC64_RWSEM_H
-
-#ifndef _LINUX_RWSEM_H
-#error "please don't include asm/rwsem.h directly, use linux/rwsem.h instead"
-#endif
-
-#ifdef __KERNEL__
-
-#define RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE		0x00000000L
-#define RWSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS		0x00000001L
-#define RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK		0xffffffffL
-#define RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS		(-RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK-1)
-#define RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS		RWSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS
-#define RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS		(RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS + RWSEM_ACTIVE_BIAS)
-
-/*
- * lock for reading
- */
-static inline void __down_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
-	if (unlikely(atomic64_inc_return((atomic64_t *)(&sem->count)) <= 0L))
-		rwsem_down_read_failed(sem);
-}
-
-static inline int __down_read_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
-	long tmp;
-
-	while ((tmp = sem->count) >= 0L) {
-		if (tmp = cmpxchg(&sem->count, tmp,
-				   tmp + RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS)) {
-			return 1;
-		}
-	}
-	return 0;
-}
-
-/*
- * lock for writing
- */
-static inline void __down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
-	long tmp;
-
-	tmp = atomic64_add_return(RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS,
-				  (atomic64_t *)(&sem->count));
-	if (unlikely(tmp != RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS))
-		rwsem_down_write_failed(sem);
-}
-
-static inline int __down_write_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
-	long tmp;
-
-	tmp = cmpxchg(&sem->count, RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE,
-		      RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS);
-	return tmp = RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE;
-}
-
-/*
- * unlock after reading
- */
-static inline void __up_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
-	long tmp;
-
-	tmp = atomic64_dec_return((atomic64_t *)(&sem->count));
-	if (unlikely(tmp < -1L && (tmp & RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK) = 0L))
-		rwsem_wake(sem);
-}
-
-/*
- * unlock after writing
- */
-static inline void __up_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
-	if (unlikely(atomic64_sub_return(RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS,
-					 (atomic64_t *)(&sem->count)) < 0L))
-		rwsem_wake(sem);
-}
-
-/*
- * implement atomic add functionality
- */
-static inline void rwsem_atomic_add(long delta, struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
-	atomic64_add(delta, (atomic64_t *)(&sem->count));
-}
-
-/*
- * downgrade write lock to read lock
- */
-static inline void __downgrade_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
-	long tmp;
-
-	tmp = atomic64_add_return(-RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS, (atomic64_t *)(&sem->count));
-	if (tmp < 0L)
-		rwsem_downgrade_wake(sem);
-}
-
-/*
- * implement exchange and add functionality
- */
-static inline long rwsem_atomic_update(long delta, struct rw_semaphore *sem)
-{
-	return atomic64_add_return(delta, (atomic64_t *)(&sem->count));
-}
-
-#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
-
-#endif /* _SPARC64_RWSEM_H */
-- 
2.8.0.rc3

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-04-06  9:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 226+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-29 12:58 [PATCH 0/11] introduce down_write_killable for rw_semaphore Michal Hocko
2016-02-29 12:58 ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-29 12:58 ` [PATCH 01/11] locking, rwsem: get rid of __down_write_nested Michal Hocko
2016-02-29 12:58   ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-29 12:58 ` [PATCH 02/11] locking, rwsem: drop explicit memory barriers Michal Hocko
2016-02-29 12:58   ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-29 12:58 ` [PATCH 03/11] locking, rwsem: introduce basis for down_write_killable Michal Hocko
2016-02-29 12:58   ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-30 13:25   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-30 13:25     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-31  8:33     ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-31  8:33       ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-31  8:44       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-31  8:44         ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-31  8:55   ` [PATCH] " Michal Hocko
2016-03-31  8:55     ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-29 12:58 ` [PATCH 04/11] alpha, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable Michal Hocko
2016-02-29 12:58   ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-29 12:58 ` [PATCH 05/11] ia64, " Michal Hocko
2016-02-29 12:58   ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-29 12:58 ` [PATCH 06/11] s390, " Michal Hocko
2016-02-29 12:58   ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-29 12:58 ` [PATCH 07/11] sh, " Michal Hocko
2016-02-29 12:58   ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-29 12:58 ` [PATCH 08/11] sparc, " Michal Hocko
2016-02-29 12:58   ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-29 12:58 ` [PATCH 09/11] xtensa, " Michal Hocko
2016-02-29 12:58   ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-29 12:58 ` [PATCH 10/11] x86, " Michal Hocko
2016-02-29 12:58   ` Michal Hocko
2016-02-29 12:58 ` [PATCH 11/11] locking, rwsem: provide down_write_killable Michal Hocko
2016-02-29 12:58   ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-30 13:32 ` [PATCH 0/11] introduce down_write_killable for rw_semaphore Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-30 13:32   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-31  8:59   ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-31  8:59     ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-31  9:20     ` Ingo Molnar
2016-03-31  9:20       ` Ingo Molnar
2016-03-31 10:58       ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-31 10:58         ` Michal Hocko
2016-03-31 17:03       ` Andrew Morton
2016-03-31 17:03         ` Andrew Morton
2016-04-01  6:33         ` Ingo Molnar
2016-04-01  6:33           ` Ingo Molnar
2016-04-01  9:21           ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-01  9:21             ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-01  9:50             ` Ingo Molnar
2016-04-01  9:50               ` Ingo Molnar
2016-04-01 10:52               ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-01 10:52                 ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-01  7:26         ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-01  7:26           ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-01  9:11           ` Andrew Morton
2016-04-01  9:11             ` Andrew Morton
2016-04-01 11:04 ` [PATCH 0/11] introduce down_write_killable for rw_semaphore v2 Michal Hocko
2016-04-01 11:04   ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-01 11:04   ` [PATCH 01/11] locking, rwsem: get rid of __down_write_nested Michal Hocko
2016-04-01 11:04     ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-02  0:28     ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-04-02  0:28       ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-04-01 11:04   ` [PATCH 02/11] locking, rwsem: drop explicit memory barriers Michal Hocko
2016-04-01 11:04     ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-02  1:17     ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-04-02  1:17       ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-04-04  9:03       ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-04  9:03         ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-04  9:06         ` [PATCH 1/2] xtensa, rwsem: drop superfluous arch specific implementation Michal Hocko
2016-04-04  9:06           ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-04  9:06           ` [PATCH 2/2] sh, " Michal Hocko
2016-04-04  9:06             ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-06  9:26             ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-06  9:26               ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-06  9:50               ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-04-06  9:50                 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-04-06 10:27                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-06 10:27                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-04 10:23           ` [PATCH 1/2] xtensa, " Max Filippov
2016-04-04 10:23             ` Max Filippov
2016-04-06  9:06       ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2016-04-06  9:06         ` [PATCH] sparc, " Michal Hocko
2016-04-06  9:06         ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-06  9:06         ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-01 11:04   ` [PATCH 03/11] locking, rwsem: introduce basis for down_write_killable Michal Hocko
2016-04-01 11:04     ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-02  4:41     ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-04-02  4:41       ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-04-04  9:17       ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-04  9:17         ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-04  9:21         ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-04  9:21           ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-07  6:58         ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-04-07  6:58           ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-04-07  7:38           ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-07  7:38             ` Michal Hocko
2016-05-10 10:43     ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-05-10 11:53       ` Michal Hocko
2016-05-10 12:38         ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-10 13:57           ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-05-11  7:23           ` Michal Hocko
2016-05-11  8:28             ` Michal Hocko
2016-05-11  8:44               ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-11  9:04                 ` Michal Hocko
2016-05-11  9:17                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-11  9:31                     ` Michal Hocko
2016-05-11  9:41                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-11 13:59                         ` Michal Hocko
2016-05-11 18:03                           ` Michal Hocko
2016-05-12 11:57                             ` [PATCH] locking, rwsem: Fix down_write_killable() Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-12 12:15                               ` [tip:locking/rwsem] locking/rwsem: " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-12 16:59                               ` [PATCH] locking, rwsem: " Michal Hocko
2016-05-15 20:57                               ` [tip:locking/rwsem] locking/rwsem: " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-12 12:12                             ` [PATCH 03/11] locking, rwsem: introduce basis for down_write_killable Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-12 12:19                               ` Michal Hocko
2016-05-12 13:58                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-12 19:42                                 ` Waiman Long
2016-05-11  8:35             ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-11  9:02               ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-01 11:04   ` [PATCH 04/11] alpha, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable Michal Hocko
2016-04-01 11:04     ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-01 11:04   ` [PATCH 05/11] ia64, " Michal Hocko
2016-04-01 11:04     ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-01 11:04   ` [PATCH 06/11] s390, " Michal Hocko
2016-04-01 11:04     ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-01 11:04   ` [PATCH 07/11] sh, " Michal Hocko
2016-04-01 11:04     ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-01 11:04   ` [PATCH 08/11] sparc, " Michal Hocko
2016-04-01 11:04     ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-01 11:04   ` [PATCH 09/11] xtensa, " Michal Hocko
2016-04-01 11:04     ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-01 11:04   ` [PATCH 10/11] x86, " Michal Hocko
2016-04-01 11:04     ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-06 18:31     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-06 18:31       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-01 11:04   ` [PATCH 11/11] locking, rwsem: provide down_write_killable Michal Hocko
2016-04-01 11:04     ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-07 15:12 ` [PATCH 0/11] introduce down_write_killable for rw_semaphore v3 Michal Hocko
2016-04-07 15:12   ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-07 15:12   ` [PATCH 01/11] locking, rwsem: get rid of __down_write_nested Michal Hocko
2016-04-07 15:12     ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-13 11:32     ` [tip:locking/rwsem] locking/rwsem: Get rid of __down_write_nested() tip-bot for Michal Hocko
2016-04-07 15:12   ` [PATCH 02/11] locking, rwsem: drop explicit memory barriers Michal Hocko
2016-04-07 15:12     ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-13 11:32     ` [tip:locking/rwsem] locking/rwsem: Drop " tip-bot for Michal Hocko
2016-04-07 15:12   ` [PATCH 03/11] xtensa, rwsem: drop superfluous arch specific implementation Michal Hocko
2016-04-07 15:12     ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-13 11:33     ` [tip:locking/rwsem] locking/rwsem, xtensa: Drop " tip-bot for Michal Hocko
2016-04-07 15:12   ` [PATCH 04/11] sh, rwsem: drop " Michal Hocko
2016-04-07 15:12     ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-13 11:33     ` [tip:locking/rwsem] locking/rwsem, sh: Drop " tip-bot for Michal Hocko
2016-04-07 15:12   ` [PATCH 05/11] sparc, rwsem: drop " Michal Hocko
2016-04-07 15:12     ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-13 11:33     ` [tip:locking/rwsem] locking/rwsem, sparc: Drop " tip-bot for Michal Hocko
2016-04-07 15:12   ` [PATCH 06/11] locking, rwsem: introduce basis for down_write_killable Michal Hocko
2016-04-07 15:12     ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-13 11:34     ` [tip:locking/rwsem] locking/rwsem: Introduce basis for down_write_killable() tip-bot for Michal Hocko
2016-04-07 15:12   ` [PATCH 07/11] alpha, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable Michal Hocko
2016-04-07 15:12     ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-22  9:42     ` [tip:locking/rwsem] locking/rwsem, alpha: Provide __down_write_killable() tip-bot for Michal Hocko
2016-04-07 15:12   ` [PATCH 08/11] ia64, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable Michal Hocko
2016-04-07 15:12     ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-07 17:28     ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-04-07 17:28       ` Sergei Shtylyov
2016-04-08  6:22       ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-08  6:22         ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-22  9:43     ` [tip:locking/rwsem] locking/rwsem, ia64: Provide __down_write_killable() tip-bot for Michal Hocko
2016-04-07 15:12   ` [PATCH 09/11] s390, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable Michal Hocko
2016-04-07 15:12     ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-22  9:43     ` [tip:locking/rwsem] locking/rwsem, s390: Provide __down_write_killable() tip-bot for Michal Hocko
2016-04-07 15:12   ` [PATCH 10/11] x86, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable Michal Hocko
2016-04-07 15:12     ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-13  9:08     ` Ingo Molnar
2016-04-13  9:08       ` Ingo Molnar
2016-04-13  9:16       ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-13  9:16         ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-13  9:19         ` Ingo Molnar
2016-04-13  9:19           ` Ingo Molnar
2016-04-13 10:27           ` Ingo Molnar
2016-04-13 10:27             ` Ingo Molnar
2016-04-13 12:49             ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-13 12:49               ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-13 12:49               ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-13 12:49               ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-17 16:59               ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-17 16:59                 ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-17 16:59                 ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-20 13:40               ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-20 13:40                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-20 13:40                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-20 18:04                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-04-20 18:04                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-04-20 20:45                   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-04-20 20:45                     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-04-20 20:58                     ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-20 20:58                       ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-20 21:06                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-04-20 21:06                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-04-20 21:36                       ` Borislav Petkov
2016-04-20 21:36                         ` Borislav Petkov
2016-04-20 22:29                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-04-20 22:29                           ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-04-21 11:35                           ` Borislav Petkov
2016-04-21 11:35                             ` Borislav Petkov
2016-04-21 13:09                             ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-21 13:09                               ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-21 13:21                               ` Borislav Petkov
2016-04-21 13:21                                 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-04-27 12:02                           ` [PATCH] x86/locking/rwsem: Cleanup ____down_write() Borislav Petkov
2016-04-27 12:02                             ` Borislav Petkov
2016-04-28 10:27                             ` [tip:locking/rwsem] locking/rwsem, x86: Clean up ____down_write() tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
2016-04-22  6:53                 ` [PATCH 10/11] x86, rwsem: provide __down_write_killable Ingo Molnar
2016-04-22  6:53                   ` Ingo Molnar
2016-04-22  6:53                   ` Ingo Molnar
2016-04-13  9:57     ` [PATCH] x86: add frame annotation for call_rwsem_down_write_failed_killable Michal Hocko
2016-04-13  9:57       ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-13  9:57       ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-22  9:44       ` [tip:locking/rwsem] locking/rwsem, x86: Add frame annotation for call_rwsem_down_write_failed_killable() tip-bot for Michal Hocko
2016-04-22  9:43     ` [tip:locking/rwsem] locking/rwsem, x86: Provide __down_write_killable() tip-bot for Michal Hocko
2016-04-07 15:12   ` [PATCH 11/11] locking, rwsem: provide down_write_killable Michal Hocko
2016-04-07 15:12     ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-22  9:44     ` [tip:locking/rwsem] locking/rwsem: Provide down_write_killable() tip-bot for Michal Hocko
2016-04-12  9:37   ` [PATCH 0/11] introduce down_write_killable for rw_semaphore v3 Michal Hocko
2016-04-12  9:37     ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-12 15:40     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-12 15:40       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-12 18:01       ` Michal Hocko
2016-04-12 18:01         ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160406090638.GB24272@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.