Re: [PATCH 0/6] ocfs2: wire up {clone,copy,dedupe}_range

From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Eric Ren <zren@suse.com>
Cc: mfasheh@versity.com, jlbec@evilplan.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] ocfs2: wire up {clone,copy,dedupe}_range
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 07:05:01 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161111150501.GE16807@birch.djwong.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4d01515b-7511-22f7-4c71-ae76eab0ec47@suse.com>

On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 11:15:57AM +0800, Eric Ren wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 11/10/2016 06:51 AM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> >Hi all,
> >
> >These patches wire up the existing ocfs2 reflinking capabilities to
> >the new(ish) VFS {copy,clone,dedupe}_range interface.  The first few
> >patches clean up some minor bugs that I found; the last kernel patch
> >contains the new code.
> >
> >A few minor fixes to xfstests are needed to make more of the tests
> >run.  I'll tack that patch on the end.
> 
> FYI, reflink testcases from ocfs2-test both on single and multiple node(s)
> all passed with your patches. At least, it shows that no obvious regression issue
> is observed so far ;-)

Heh, good. :)

The v2 patch contains some fixes for a few things I thought of last night
that don't have xfstests yet.

I /think/ the locking is ok, but that could use some review. :)

--D

> 
> Eric
> >
> >--D
> >
> >[1] https://github.com/djwong/linux/tree/ocfs2-vfs-reflink
> >--
> >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
> >the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> >More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >
> 