From: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> To: afzal mohammed <afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com> Cc: kbuild-all@01.org, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>, Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, afzal mohammed <afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] ARM: mmu: decouple VECTORS_BASE from Kconfig Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 22:07:20 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <201701192206.1mDZ9sr0%fengguang.wu@intel.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20170118203739.6400-1-afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com> [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4244 bytes --] Hi afzal, [auto build test ERROR on linus/master] [also build test ERROR on v4.10-rc4 next-20170119] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/afzal-mohammed/ARM-mmu-decouple-VECTORS_BASE-from-Kconfig/20170119-171424 config: arm-stm32_defconfig (attached as .config) compiler: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (Debian 6.1.1-9) 6.1.1 20160705 reproduce: wget https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross # save the attached .config to linux build tree make.cross ARCH=arm Note: the linux-review/afzal-mohammed/ARM-mmu-decouple-VECTORS_BASE-from-Kconfig/20170119-171424 HEAD dd110acc21d40c8f50374de1e500a091d14f29c8 builds fine. It only hurts bisectibility. All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): arch/arm/mm/init.c: In function 'mem_init': >> arch/arm/mm/init.c:525:11: error: 'VECTORS_BASEUL' undeclared (first use in this function) MLK(UL(VECTORS_BASE), UL(VECTORS_BASE) + (PAGE_SIZE)), ^ arch/arm/mm/init.c:501:19: note: in definition of macro 'MLK' #define MLK(b, t) b, t, ((t) - (b)) >> 10 ^ >> include/uapi/linux/const.h:20:18: note: in expansion of macro '__AC' #define _AC(X,Y) __AC(X,Y) ^~~~ >> arch/arm/include/asm/memory.h:29:15: note: in expansion of macro '_AC' #define UL(x) _AC(x, UL) ^~~ >> include/linux/printk.h:297:36: note: in expansion of macro 'UL' printk(KERN_NOTICE pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__) ^~~~~~~~~~~ >> arch/arm/mm/init.c:505:2: note: in expansion of macro 'pr_notice' pr_notice("Virtual kernel memory layout:\n" ^~~~~~~~~ arch/arm/mm/init.c:525:11: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in MLK(UL(VECTORS_BASE), UL(VECTORS_BASE) + (PAGE_SIZE)), ^ arch/arm/mm/init.c:501:19: note: in definition of macro 'MLK' #define MLK(b, t) b, t, ((t) - (b)) >> 10 ^ >> include/uapi/linux/const.h:20:18: note: in expansion of macro '__AC' #define _AC(X,Y) __AC(X,Y) ^~~~ >> arch/arm/include/asm/memory.h:29:15: note: in expansion of macro '_AC' #define UL(x) _AC(x, UL) ^~~ >> include/linux/printk.h:297:36: note: in expansion of macro 'UL' printk(KERN_NOTICE pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__) ^~~~~~~~~~~ >> arch/arm/mm/init.c:505:2: note: in expansion of macro 'pr_notice' pr_notice("Virtual kernel memory layout:\n" ^~~~~~~~~ vim +/VECTORS_BASEUL +525 arch/arm/mm/init.c 499 mem_init_print_info(NULL); 500 501 #define MLK(b, t) b, t, ((t) - (b)) >> 10 502 #define MLM(b, t) b, t, ((t) - (b)) >> 20 503 #define MLK_ROUNDUP(b, t) b, t, DIV_ROUND_UP(((t) - (b)), SZ_1K) 504 > 505 pr_notice("Virtual kernel memory layout:\n" 506 " vector : 0x%08lx - 0x%08lx (%4ld kB)\n" 507 #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_TCM 508 " DTCM : 0x%08lx - 0x%08lx (%4ld kB)\n" 509 " ITCM : 0x%08lx - 0x%08lx (%4ld kB)\n" 510 #endif 511 " fixmap : 0x%08lx - 0x%08lx (%4ld kB)\n" 512 " vmalloc : 0x%08lx - 0x%08lx (%4ld MB)\n" 513 " lowmem : 0x%08lx - 0x%08lx (%4ld MB)\n" 514 #ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM 515 " pkmap : 0x%08lx - 0x%08lx (%4ld MB)\n" 516 #endif 517 #ifdef CONFIG_MODULES 518 " modules : 0x%08lx - 0x%08lx (%4ld MB)\n" 519 #endif 520 " .text : 0x%p" " - 0x%p" " (%4td kB)\n" 521 " .init : 0x%p" " - 0x%p" " (%4td kB)\n" 522 " .data : 0x%p" " - 0x%p" " (%4td kB)\n" 523 " .bss : 0x%p" " - 0x%p" " (%4td kB)\n", 524 > 525 MLK(UL(VECTORS_BASE), UL(VECTORS_BASE) + (PAGE_SIZE)), 526 #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_TCM 527 MLK(DTCM_OFFSET, (unsigned long) dtcm_end), 528 MLK(ITCM_OFFSET, (unsigned long) itcm_end), --- 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation [-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --] [-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 8634 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: lkp@intel.com (kbuild test robot) To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH 1/4] ARM: mmu: decouple VECTORS_BASE from Kconfig Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 22:07:20 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <201701192206.1mDZ9sr0%fengguang.wu@intel.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20170118203739.6400-1-afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com> Hi afzal, [auto build test ERROR on linus/master] [also build test ERROR on v4.10-rc4 next-20170119] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/afzal-mohammed/ARM-mmu-decouple-VECTORS_BASE-from-Kconfig/20170119-171424 config: arm-stm32_defconfig (attached as .config) compiler: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (Debian 6.1.1-9) 6.1.1 20160705 reproduce: wget https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross # save the attached .config to linux build tree make.cross ARCH=arm Note: the linux-review/afzal-mohammed/ARM-mmu-decouple-VECTORS_BASE-from-Kconfig/20170119-171424 HEAD dd110acc21d40c8f50374de1e500a091d14f29c8 builds fine. It only hurts bisectibility. All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): arch/arm/mm/init.c: In function 'mem_init': >> arch/arm/mm/init.c:525:11: error: 'VECTORS_BASEUL' undeclared (first use in this function) MLK(UL(VECTORS_BASE), UL(VECTORS_BASE) + (PAGE_SIZE)), ^ arch/arm/mm/init.c:501:19: note: in definition of macro 'MLK' #define MLK(b, t) b, t, ((t) - (b)) >> 10 ^ >> include/uapi/linux/const.h:20:18: note: in expansion of macro '__AC' #define _AC(X,Y) __AC(X,Y) ^~~~ >> arch/arm/include/asm/memory.h:29:15: note: in expansion of macro '_AC' #define UL(x) _AC(x, UL) ^~~ >> include/linux/printk.h:297:36: note: in expansion of macro 'UL' printk(KERN_NOTICE pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__) ^~~~~~~~~~~ >> arch/arm/mm/init.c:505:2: note: in expansion of macro 'pr_notice' pr_notice("Virtual kernel memory layout:\n" ^~~~~~~~~ arch/arm/mm/init.c:525:11: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in MLK(UL(VECTORS_BASE), UL(VECTORS_BASE) + (PAGE_SIZE)), ^ arch/arm/mm/init.c:501:19: note: in definition of macro 'MLK' #define MLK(b, t) b, t, ((t) - (b)) >> 10 ^ >> include/uapi/linux/const.h:20:18: note: in expansion of macro '__AC' #define _AC(X,Y) __AC(X,Y) ^~~~ >> arch/arm/include/asm/memory.h:29:15: note: in expansion of macro '_AC' #define UL(x) _AC(x, UL) ^~~ >> include/linux/printk.h:297:36: note: in expansion of macro 'UL' printk(KERN_NOTICE pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__) ^~~~~~~~~~~ >> arch/arm/mm/init.c:505:2: note: in expansion of macro 'pr_notice' pr_notice("Virtual kernel memory layout:\n" ^~~~~~~~~ vim +/VECTORS_BASEUL +525 arch/arm/mm/init.c 499 mem_init_print_info(NULL); 500 501 #define MLK(b, t) b, t, ((t) - (b)) >> 10 502 #define MLM(b, t) b, t, ((t) - (b)) >> 20 503 #define MLK_ROUNDUP(b, t) b, t, DIV_ROUND_UP(((t) - (b)), SZ_1K) 504 > 505 pr_notice("Virtual kernel memory layout:\n" 506 " vector : 0x%08lx - 0x%08lx (%4ld kB)\n" 507 #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_TCM 508 " DTCM : 0x%08lx - 0x%08lx (%4ld kB)\n" 509 " ITCM : 0x%08lx - 0x%08lx (%4ld kB)\n" 510 #endif 511 " fixmap : 0x%08lx - 0x%08lx (%4ld kB)\n" 512 " vmalloc : 0x%08lx - 0x%08lx (%4ld MB)\n" 513 " lowmem : 0x%08lx - 0x%08lx (%4ld MB)\n" 514 #ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM 515 " pkmap : 0x%08lx - 0x%08lx (%4ld MB)\n" 516 #endif 517 #ifdef CONFIG_MODULES 518 " modules : 0x%08lx - 0x%08lx (%4ld MB)\n" 519 #endif 520 " .text : 0x%p" " - 0x%p" " (%4td kB)\n" 521 " .init : 0x%p" " - 0x%p" " (%4td kB)\n" 522 " .data : 0x%p" " - 0x%p" " (%4td kB)\n" 523 " .bss : 0x%p" " - 0x%p" " (%4td kB)\n", 524 > 525 MLK(UL(VECTORS_BASE), UL(VECTORS_BASE) + (PAGE_SIZE)), 526 #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_TCM 527 MLK(DTCM_OFFSET, (unsigned long) dtcm_end), 528 MLK(ITCM_OFFSET, (unsigned long) itcm_end), --- 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: .config.gz Type: application/gzip Size: 8634 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20170119/6e0941b0/attachment.gz>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-19 14:07 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2017-01-18 20:35 [PATCH 0/4] ARM: v7-A !MMU support, CONFIG_VECTORS_BASE removal (almost) afzal mohammed 2017-01-18 20:35 ` afzal mohammed 2017-01-18 20:37 ` [PATCH 1/4] ARM: mmu: decouple VECTORS_BASE from Kconfig afzal mohammed 2017-01-18 20:37 ` afzal mohammed 2017-01-19 13:21 ` Afzal Mohammed 2017-01-19 13:21 ` Afzal Mohammed 2017-01-19 14:07 ` kbuild test robot [this message] 2017-01-19 14:07 ` kbuild test robot 2017-01-19 14:24 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2017-01-19 14:24 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2017-01-20 16:06 ` Afzal Mohammed 2017-01-20 16:06 ` Afzal Mohammed 2017-01-22 3:27 ` Afzal Mohammed 2017-01-22 3:27 ` Afzal Mohammed 2017-01-18 20:38 ` [PATCH 2/4] ARM: nommu: dynamic exception base address setting afzal mohammed 2017-01-18 20:38 ` afzal mohammed 2017-01-19 13:59 ` Vladimir Murzin 2017-01-19 13:59 ` Vladimir Murzin 2017-01-20 16:20 ` Afzal Mohammed 2017-01-20 16:20 ` Afzal Mohammed 2017-01-22 3:37 ` Afzal Mohammed 2017-01-22 3:37 ` Afzal Mohammed 2017-01-18 20:38 ` [PATCH 3/4] ARM: nommu: display vectors base afzal mohammed 2017-01-18 20:38 ` afzal mohammed 2017-01-18 22:13 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2017-01-18 22:13 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2017-01-19 13:16 ` Afzal Mohammed 2017-01-19 13:16 ` Afzal Mohammed 2017-01-30 12:09 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2017-01-30 12:09 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2017-01-18 20:39 ` [PATCH 4/4] ARM: nommu: remove Hivecs configuration is asm afzal mohammed 2017-01-18 20:39 ` afzal mohammed
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=201701192206.1mDZ9sr0%fengguang.wu@intel.com \ --to=lkp@intel.com \ --cc=afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com \ --cc=kbuild-all@01.org \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \ --cc=vladimir.murzin@arm.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.