Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 02/11] arm64: allwinner: a64: add NMI controller on A64

From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
To: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
Cc: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.io>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 02/11] arm64: allwinner: a64: add NMI controller on A64
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2017 08:11:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170405061137.n66ectbkl7a2fv5f@lukather> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGb2v67BucT8=FTgem3AmSU9XJA7OHoTCq3t3wBzDWyuwzZqaA@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 642 bytes --]

On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 11:51:45AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 2:01 AM, Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.io> wrote:
> > Allwinner A64 SoC features a NMI controller, which is usually connected
> > to the AXP PMIC.
> >
> > Add support for it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.io>
> 
> This might not be the best representation of the R_INTC block. Though
> we'd need to change it for all SoCs if we want to be accurate. For now,

What do you think would be a good representation?

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]