All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
To: Martin Kepplinger <martink@posteo.de>,
	Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info>,
	daniel.vetter@intel.com, Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
	Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] i915: flush gem obj freeing workqueues to add accuracy to the i915 shrinker
Date: Fri,  7 Apr 2017 01:23:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170406232347.988-3-aarcange@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170406232347.988-1-aarcange@redhat.com>

Waiting a RCU grace period only guarantees the work gets queued, but
until after the queued workqueue returns, there's no guarantee the
memory was actually freed. So flush the work to provide better
guarantees to the reclaim code in addition of waiting a RCU grace
period to pass.

Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c          | 2 ++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_shrinker.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index 3982489..612fde3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -4748,6 +4748,7 @@ int i915_gem_freeze(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 	 * running workqueue may wait on the struct_mutex.
 	 */
 	synchronize_rcu(); /* wait for our earlier RCU delayed slab frees */
+	flush_work(&dev_priv->mm.free_work);
 
 	intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
 
@@ -4789,6 +4790,7 @@ int i915_gem_freeze_late(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 	mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->drm.struct_mutex);
 
 	synchronize_rcu_expedited();
+	flush_work(&dev_priv->mm.free_work);
 
 	return 0;
 }
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_shrinker.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_shrinker.c
index fea1454..30f79af 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_shrinker.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_shrinker.c
@@ -329,6 +329,7 @@ i915_gem_shrinker_scan(struct shrinker *shrinker, struct shrink_control *sc)
 		 * blocked waiting on us to release struct_mutex.
 		 */
 		synchronize_rcu_expedited();
+	flush_work(&dev_priv->mm.free_work);
 
 	return freed;
 }

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
To: Martin Kepplinger <martink@posteo.de>,
	Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info>,
	daniel.vetter@intel.com, Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
	Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] i915: flush gem obj freeing workqueues to add accuracy to the i915 shrinker
Date: Fri,  7 Apr 2017 01:23:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170406232347.988-3-aarcange@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170406232347.988-1-aarcange@redhat.com>

Waiting a RCU grace period only guarantees the work gets queued, but
until after the queued workqueue returns, there's no guarantee the
memory was actually freed. So flush the work to provide better
guarantees to the reclaim code in addition of waiting a RCU grace
period to pass.

Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c          | 2 ++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_shrinker.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index 3982489..612fde3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -4748,6 +4748,7 @@ int i915_gem_freeze(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 	 * running workqueue may wait on the struct_mutex.
 	 */
 	synchronize_rcu(); /* wait for our earlier RCU delayed slab frees */
+	flush_work(&dev_priv->mm.free_work);
 
 	intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
 
@@ -4789,6 +4790,7 @@ int i915_gem_freeze_late(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 	mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->drm.struct_mutex);
 
 	synchronize_rcu_expedited();
+	flush_work(&dev_priv->mm.free_work);
 
 	return 0;
 }
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_shrinker.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_shrinker.c
index fea1454..30f79af 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_shrinker.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_shrinker.c
@@ -329,6 +329,7 @@ i915_gem_shrinker_scan(struct shrinker *shrinker, struct shrink_control *sc)
 		 * blocked waiting on us to release struct_mutex.
 		 */
 		synchronize_rcu_expedited();
+	flush_work(&dev_priv->mm.free_work);
 
 	return freed;
 }
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-04-06 23:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-22  8:38 [BUG][REGRESSION] i915 gpu hangs under load Martin Kepplinger
2017-03-22 10:36 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2017-03-22 10:36   ` Jani Nikula
2017-04-02 11:50   ` [Intel-gfx] " Thorsten Leemhuis
2017-04-02 11:50     ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2017-04-02 12:13     ` [Intel-gfx] " Martin Kepplinger
2017-04-02 12:13       ` Martin Kepplinger
2017-04-03 15:09       ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2017-04-03 15:09         ` Jani Nikula
2017-04-06 23:23         ` [PATCH 0/5] " Andrea Arcangeli
2017-04-06 23:23           ` [PATCH 0/5] " Andrea Arcangeli
2017-04-06 23:23           ` [PATCH 1/5] i915: avoid kernel hang caused by synchronize rcu struct_mutex deadlock Andrea Arcangeli
2017-04-06 23:23             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2017-04-07  9:05             ` [Intel-gfx] " Joonas Lahtinen
2017-04-07  9:05               ` Joonas Lahtinen
2017-04-06 23:23           ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2017-04-06 23:23             ` [PATCH 2/5] i915: flush gem obj freeing workqueues to add accuracy to the i915 shrinker Andrea Arcangeli
2017-04-07 10:02             ` Chris Wilson
2017-04-07 10:02               ` Chris Wilson
2017-04-07 13:06               ` Andrea Arcangeli
2017-04-07 13:06                 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2017-04-07 15:30                 ` Chris Wilson
2017-04-07 15:30                   ` Chris Wilson
2017-04-07 16:48                   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2017-04-07 16:48                     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2017-04-10  9:39                     ` Chris Wilson
2017-04-10  9:39                       ` Chris Wilson
2017-04-06 23:23           ` [PATCH 3/5] i915: initialize the free_list of the fencing atomic_helper Andrea Arcangeli
2017-04-06 23:23             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2017-04-07 10:35             ` Chris Wilson
2017-04-07 10:35               ` Chris Wilson
2017-04-06 23:23           ` [PATCH 4/5] i915: schedule while freeing the lists of gem objects Andrea Arcangeli
2017-04-06 23:23             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2017-04-06 23:23           ` [PATCH 5/5] i915: fence workqueue optimization Andrea Arcangeli
2017-04-06 23:23             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2017-04-07  9:58             ` Chris Wilson
2017-04-07  9:58               ` Chris Wilson
2017-04-07 13:13               ` Andrea Arcangeli
2017-04-07 13:13                 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2017-04-10 10:15           ` [PATCH 0/5] Re: [Intel-gfx] [BUG][REGRESSION] i915 gpu hangs under load Martin Kepplinger
2017-04-10 10:15             ` [PATCH 0/5] " Martin Kepplinger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170406232347.988-3-aarcange@redhat.com \
    --to=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martink@posteo.de \
    --cc=regressions@leemhuis.info \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.