All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Kaiser <martin@kaiser.cx>
To: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
	martin@kaiser.cx, Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de,
	Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>,
	Steffen Trumtrar <s.trumtrar@pengutronix.de>,
	Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] hwrng: mxc-fsl - add support for Freescale RNGC
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 23:01:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170717210144.GA15429@reykholt.kaiser.cx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56E2E7F1.6020501@mentor.com>

Dear all,

looking for a Freescale RNGB/C driver, I came across this old mail
thread. It seems the review got stuck and the driver was never merged.
This mail is the latest conversation I could find.

I would like to pick up this work and prepare the RNGC driver for
merging into the mailine kernel.

Thus wrote Vladimir Zapolskiy (vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com):

> > +#define RNGC_VERID_VERSION_MAJOR_MASK		0x0000ff00
> > +#define RNGC_VERID_VERSION_MAJOR_SHIFT		8
> > +#define RNGC_VERID_VERSION_MINOR_MASK		0x000000ff
> > +#define RNGC_VERID_VERSION_MINOR_SHIFT		0

> All RNGC_VERID_* are not used. And actually quite many other
> defined values are not used, e.g. all *_ZEROS_MASK etc.

I removed unused defines.

> > +	struct mxc_rngc *rngc = (struct mxc_rngc *)priv;
> > +	int handled = IRQ_NONE;
> > +
> > +	/* is the seed creation done? */
> > +	if (__raw_readl(rngc->base + RNGC_STATUS) & RNGC_STATUS_SEED_DONE) {
> > +		complete(&rngc->rng_seed_done);
> > +		__raw_writel(RNGC_CMD_CLR_INT | RNGC_CMD_CLR_ERR,
> > +			     rngc->base + RNGC_COMMAND);
> > +		handled = IRQ_HANDLED;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	/* is the self test done? */
> > +	if (__raw_readl(rngc->base + RNGC_STATUS) & RNGC_STATUS_ST_DONE) {
> > +		complete(&rngc->rng_self_testing);
> > +		__raw_writel(RNGC_CMD_CLR_INT | RNGC_CMD_CLR_ERR,
> > +			     rngc->base + RNGC_COMMAND);
> > +		handled = IRQ_HANDLED;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	/* is there any error? */
> > +	if (__raw_readl(rngc->base + RNGC_STATUS) & RNGC_STATUS_ERROR) {
> > +		/* clear interrupt */
> > +		__raw_writel(RNGC_CMD_CLR_INT | RNGC_CMD_CLR_ERR,
> > +			     rngc->base + RNGC_COMMAND);
> > +		handled = IRQ_HANDLED;

> For the code errors seem to be harmless, is it so? Does it make
> sense to inform a user about errors?

Either one of the completions is triggered or we time out when we wait
on a wait queue, see below. In any case, we read the error register and
abort the operation if there's an error.

> > +		wait_for_completion(&rngc->rng_self_testing);

> I would suggest to use wait_for_completion_timeout().

I fixed this.

> > +
> > +	} while (__raw_readl(rngc->base + RNGC_ERROR) &
> > +		 RNGC_ERROR_STATUS_ST_ERR);

> Logic of running a self test until error condition is gone looks strange.

Agreed. I don't see why the self test should fail in the first run and
complete successfully when we retry without a reset. I changed the code
to run the self test only once.

> > +
> > +	/* clear interrupt. Is it really necessary here? */
> > +	__raw_writel(RNGC_CMD_CLR_INT | RNGC_CMD_CLR_ERR,
> > +		     rngc->base + RNGC_COMMAND);

> Answering the question above I believe it is not needed here.

True. The irq handler clears the error status and interrupt bits.

> > +		wait_for_completion(&rngc->rng_seed_done);

> I would suggest to use wait_for_completion_timeout().

Done.

> > +
> > +	} while (__raw_readl(rngc->base + RNGC_ERROR) &
> > +		 RNGC_ERROR_STATUS_STAT_ERR);

> Any chance to loop forever?

I exit the loop now for all errors except the "statistical error". This
+ the timeout on the wait queue should prevent us from looping forever.

> > +	if (ret) {
> > +		dev_err(rngc->dev, "Can't get interrupt working.\n");
> > +		return -EIO;

> Leaked enabled rngc->clk clock on error path.

I restructured the probe function such that the clock is disabled when
there's an error after it was enabled.


Best regards,

   Martin

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: martin@kaiser.cx (Martin Kaiser)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/3] hwrng: mxc-fsl - add support for Freescale RNGC
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 23:01:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170717210144.GA15429@reykholt.kaiser.cx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56E2E7F1.6020501@mentor.com>

Dear all,

looking for a Freescale RNGB/C driver, I came across this old mail
thread. It seems the review got stuck and the driver was never merged.
This mail is the latest conversation I could find.

I would like to pick up this work and prepare the RNGC driver for
merging into the mailine kernel.

Thus wrote Vladimir Zapolskiy (vladimir_zapolskiy at mentor.com):

> > +#define RNGC_VERID_VERSION_MAJOR_MASK		0x0000ff00
> > +#define RNGC_VERID_VERSION_MAJOR_SHIFT		8
> > +#define RNGC_VERID_VERSION_MINOR_MASK		0x000000ff
> > +#define RNGC_VERID_VERSION_MINOR_SHIFT		0

> All RNGC_VERID_* are not used. And actually quite many other
> defined values are not used, e.g. all *_ZEROS_MASK etc.

I removed unused defines.

> > +	struct mxc_rngc *rngc = (struct mxc_rngc *)priv;
> > +	int handled = IRQ_NONE;
> > +
> > +	/* is the seed creation done? */
> > +	if (__raw_readl(rngc->base + RNGC_STATUS) & RNGC_STATUS_SEED_DONE) {
> > +		complete(&rngc->rng_seed_done);
> > +		__raw_writel(RNGC_CMD_CLR_INT | RNGC_CMD_CLR_ERR,
> > +			     rngc->base + RNGC_COMMAND);
> > +		handled = IRQ_HANDLED;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	/* is the self test done? */
> > +	if (__raw_readl(rngc->base + RNGC_STATUS) & RNGC_STATUS_ST_DONE) {
> > +		complete(&rngc->rng_self_testing);
> > +		__raw_writel(RNGC_CMD_CLR_INT | RNGC_CMD_CLR_ERR,
> > +			     rngc->base + RNGC_COMMAND);
> > +		handled = IRQ_HANDLED;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	/* is there any error? */
> > +	if (__raw_readl(rngc->base + RNGC_STATUS) & RNGC_STATUS_ERROR) {
> > +		/* clear interrupt */
> > +		__raw_writel(RNGC_CMD_CLR_INT | RNGC_CMD_CLR_ERR,
> > +			     rngc->base + RNGC_COMMAND);
> > +		handled = IRQ_HANDLED;

> For the code errors seem to be harmless, is it so? Does it make
> sense to inform a user about errors?

Either one of the completions is triggered or we time out when we wait
on a wait queue, see below. In any case, we read the error register and
abort the operation if there's an error.

> > +		wait_for_completion(&rngc->rng_self_testing);

> I would suggest to use wait_for_completion_timeout().

I fixed this.

> > +
> > +	} while (__raw_readl(rngc->base + RNGC_ERROR) &
> > +		 RNGC_ERROR_STATUS_ST_ERR);

> Logic of running a self test until error condition is gone looks strange.

Agreed. I don't see why the self test should fail in the first run and
complete successfully when we retry without a reset. I changed the code
to run the self test only once.

> > +
> > +	/* clear interrupt. Is it really necessary here? */
> > +	__raw_writel(RNGC_CMD_CLR_INT | RNGC_CMD_CLR_ERR,
> > +		     rngc->base + RNGC_COMMAND);

> Answering the question above I believe it is not needed here.

True. The irq handler clears the error status and interrupt bits.

> > +		wait_for_completion(&rngc->rng_seed_done);

> I would suggest to use wait_for_completion_timeout().

Done.

> > +
> > +	} while (__raw_readl(rngc->base + RNGC_ERROR) &
> > +		 RNGC_ERROR_STATUS_STAT_ERR);

> Any chance to loop forever?

I exit the loop now for all errors except the "statistical error". This
+ the timeout on the wait queue should prevent us from looping forever.

> > +	if (ret) {
> > +		dev_err(rngc->dev, "Can't get interrupt working.\n");
> > +		return -EIO;

> Leaked enabled rngc->clk clock on error path.

I restructured the probe function such that the clock is disabled when
there's an error after it was enabled.


Best regards,

   Martin

  reply	other threads:[~2017-07-17 21:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-11 14:06 [PATCH v2 1/3] Documentation: devicetree: add Freescale RNGC binding Steffen Trumtrar
2016-03-11 14:06 ` Steffen Trumtrar
2016-03-11 14:06 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] ARM: i.MX25: add RNGC node to dtsi Steffen Trumtrar
2016-03-11 14:06   ` Steffen Trumtrar
     [not found]   ` <1457705200-16951-2-git-send-email-s.trumtrar-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2016-04-01  8:52     ` Shawn Guo
2016-04-01  8:52       ` Shawn Guo
2017-07-17 21:05       ` Martin Kaiser
2017-07-17 21:05         ` Martin Kaiser
2016-03-11 14:06 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] hwrng: mxc-fsl - add support for Freescale RNGC Steffen Trumtrar
2016-03-11 14:06   ` Steffen Trumtrar
2016-03-11 15:44   ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2016-03-11 15:44     ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2016-03-11 15:44     ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2017-07-17 21:01     ` Martin Kaiser [this message]
2017-07-17 21:01       ` Martin Kaiser
2016-03-18 19:42 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] Documentation: devicetree: add Freescale RNGC binding Rob Herring
2016-03-18 19:42   ` Rob Herring
2017-07-17 21:04   ` Martin Kaiser
2017-07-17 21:04     ` Martin Kaiser
     [not found] ` <1457705200-16951-1-git-send-email-s.trumtrar-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2017-07-17 21:16   ` [PATCH v3 " Martin Kaiser
2017-07-17 21:16     ` Martin Kaiser
2017-07-17 21:16     ` Martin Kaiser
2017-07-17 21:16     ` [PATCH v3 2/3] ARM: i.MX25: add RNGC node to dtsi Martin Kaiser
2017-07-17 21:16       ` Martin Kaiser
     [not found]     ` <1500326163-4556-1-git-send-email-martin-XxZfDwE/svGeZLLa646FqQ@public.gmane.org>
2017-07-17 21:16       ` [PATCH 3/3] hwrng: mxc-fsl - add support for Freescale RNGC Martin Kaiser
2017-07-17 21:16         ` Martin Kaiser
2017-07-17 21:16         ` Martin Kaiser
2017-07-18  5:49         ` PrasannaKumar Muralidharan
2017-07-18  5:49           ` PrasannaKumar Muralidharan
2017-07-19 21:22           ` Martin Kaiser
2017-07-19 21:22             ` Martin Kaiser
2017-07-20 20:27   ` [PATCH v5 1/3] Documentation: devicetree: add Freescale RNGC binding Martin Kaiser
2017-07-20 20:27     ` Martin Kaiser
2017-07-20 20:27     ` Martin Kaiser
2017-07-20 20:27     ` [PATCH v5 2/3] ARM: i.MX25: add RNGC node to dtsi Martin Kaiser
2017-07-20 20:27       ` Martin Kaiser
2017-07-20 20:27     ` [PATCH v5 3/3] hwrng: mxc-fsl - add support for Freescale RNGC Martin Kaiser
2017-07-20 20:27       ` Martin Kaiser
2017-07-20 21:34     ` [PATCH v5 1/3] Documentation: devicetree: add Freescale RNGC binding Rob Herring
2017-07-20 21:34       ` Rob Herring
2017-07-20 21:34       ` Rob Herring
2017-07-20 10:27 ` [PATCH v4 " Martin Kaiser
2017-07-20 10:27   ` Martin Kaiser
2017-07-20 10:27   ` [PATCH v4 2/3] ARM: i.MX25: add RNGC node to dtsi Martin Kaiser
2017-07-20 10:27     ` Martin Kaiser
2017-07-20 10:27   ` [PATCH v4 3/3] hwrng: mxc-fsl - add support for Freescale RNGC Martin Kaiser
2017-07-20 10:27     ` Martin Kaiser
     [not found]     ` <1500546435-29905-3-git-send-email-martin-XxZfDwE/svGeZLLa646FqQ@public.gmane.org>
2017-07-20 13:10       ` PrasannaKumar Muralidharan
2017-07-20 13:10         ` PrasannaKumar Muralidharan
2017-07-20 13:10         ` PrasannaKumar Muralidharan
2017-07-23 17:49 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] Documentation: devicetree: add Freescale RNGC binding Martin Kaiser
2017-07-23 17:49   ` Martin Kaiser
2017-07-23 17:49   ` [PATCH v6 2/3] ARM: i.MX25: add RNGB node to dtsi Martin Kaiser
2017-07-23 17:49     ` Martin Kaiser
2017-08-05  1:23     ` Shawn Guo
2017-08-05  1:23       ` Shawn Guo
2017-07-23 17:49   ` [PATCH v6 3/3] hwrng: add a driver for Freescale RNGC Martin Kaiser
2017-07-23 17:49     ` Martin Kaiser
2017-08-03  6:26     ` Herbert Xu
2017-08-03  6:26       ` Herbert Xu
     [not found]   ` <1500832146-8660-1-git-send-email-martin-XxZfDwE/svGeZLLa646FqQ@public.gmane.org>
2017-07-26 22:55     ` [PATCH v6 1/3] Documentation: devicetree: add Freescale RNGC binding Rob Herring
2017-07-26 22:55       ` Rob Herring
2017-07-26 22:55       ` Rob Herring
2017-08-03  6:25     ` Herbert Xu
2017-08-03  6:25       ` Herbert Xu
2017-08-03  6:25       ` Herbert Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170717210144.GA15429@reykholt.kaiser.cx \
    --to=martin@kaiser.cx \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mpm@selenic.com \
    --cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=s.trumtrar@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    --cc=vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.