All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
To: <linux-ima-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Cc: <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 03/12] ima: generalize policy file operations
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 17:44:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170725154423.24845-4-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170725154423.24845-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com>

This patch renames ima_open_policy() and ima_release_policy() respectively
to ima_open_data_upload() and ima_release_data_upload(). They will be used
to implement file operations for interfaces allowing to upload and read
provided data.

Also, the new flag IMA_POLICY_BUSY has been defined specifically for
the policy, as it might not be cleared at file release. This would prevent
userspace applications from uploading files after a policy has been loaded.

Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
---
 security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c
index e375206..f4199f2 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c
@@ -384,6 +384,7 @@ static ssize_t ima_write_data(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
 }
 
 enum ima_fs_flags {
+	IMA_POLICY_BUSY,
 	IMA_FS_BUSY,
 };
 
@@ -399,22 +400,33 @@ static const struct seq_operations ima_policy_seqops = {
 #endif
 
 /*
- * ima_open_policy: sequentialize access to the policy file
+ * ima_open_data_upload: sequentialize access to the data upload interface
  */
-static int ima_open_policy(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
+static int ima_open_data_upload(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
 {
+	enum kernel_read_file_id file_id = ima_get_file_id(filp->f_path.dentry);
+	const struct seq_operations *seq_ops = NULL;
+	enum ima_fs_flags flag = IMA_FS_BUSY;
+	bool read_allowed = false;
+
+	if (file_id == READING_POLICY) {
+		flag = IMA_POLICY_BUSY;
+#ifdef	CONFIG_IMA_READ_POLICY
+		read_allowed = true;
+		seq_ops = &ima_policy_seqops;
+#endif
+	}
+
 	if (!(filp->f_flags & O_WRONLY)) {
-#ifndef	CONFIG_IMA_READ_POLICY
-		return -EACCES;
-#else
+		if (!read_allowed)
+			return -EACCES;
 		if ((filp->f_flags & O_ACCMODE) != O_RDONLY)
 			return -EACCES;
 		if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
 			return -EPERM;
-		return seq_open(filp, &ima_policy_seqops);
-#endif
+		return seq_open(filp, seq_ops);
 	}
-	if (test_and_set_bit(IMA_FS_BUSY, &ima_fs_flags))
+	if (test_and_set_bit(flag, &ima_fs_flags))
 		return -EBUSY;
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -426,13 +438,19 @@ static int ima_open_policy(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
  * point to the new policy rules, and remove the securityfs policy file,
  * assuming a valid policy.
  */
-static int ima_release_policy(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
+static int ima_release_data_upload(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
 {
+	enum kernel_read_file_id file_id = ima_get_file_id(file->f_path.dentry);
 	const char *cause = valid_policy ? "completed" : "failed";
 
 	if ((file->f_flags & O_ACCMODE) == O_RDONLY)
 		return seq_release(inode, file);
 
+	if (file_id != READING_POLICY) {
+		clear_bit(IMA_FS_BUSY, &ima_fs_flags);
+		return 0;
+	}
+
 	if (valid_policy && ima_check_policy() < 0) {
 		cause = "failed";
 		valid_policy = 0;
@@ -454,16 +472,16 @@ static int ima_release_policy(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
 	securityfs_remove(ima_policy);
 	ima_policy = NULL;
 #else
-	clear_bit(IMA_FS_BUSY, &ima_fs_flags);
+	clear_bit(IMA_POLICY_BUSY, &ima_fs_flags);
 #endif
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static const struct file_operations ima_measure_policy_ops = {
-	.open = ima_open_policy,
+static const struct file_operations ima_data_upload_ops = {
+	.open = ima_open_data_upload,
 	.write = ima_write_data,
 	.read = seq_read,
-	.release = ima_release_policy,
+	.release = ima_release_data_upload,
 	.llseek = generic_file_llseek,
 };
 
@@ -502,7 +520,7 @@ int __init ima_fs_init(void)
 
 	ima_policy = securityfs_create_file("policy", POLICY_FILE_FLAGS,
 					    ima_dir, NULL,
-					    &ima_measure_policy_ops);
+					    &ima_data_upload_ops);
 	if (IS_ERR(ima_policy))
 		goto out;
 
-- 
2.9.3

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: roberto.sassu@huawei.com (Roberto Sassu)
To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 03/12] ima: generalize policy file operations
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 17:44:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170725154423.24845-4-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170725154423.24845-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com>

This patch renames ima_open_policy() and ima_release_policy() respectively
to ima_open_data_upload() and ima_release_data_upload(). They will be used
to implement file operations for interfaces allowing to upload and read
provided data.

Also, the new flag IMA_POLICY_BUSY has been defined specifically for
the policy, as it might not be cleared at file release. This would prevent
userspace applications from uploading files after a policy has been loaded.

Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
---
 security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c
index e375206..f4199f2 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c
@@ -384,6 +384,7 @@ static ssize_t ima_write_data(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
 }
 
 enum ima_fs_flags {
+	IMA_POLICY_BUSY,
 	IMA_FS_BUSY,
 };
 
@@ -399,22 +400,33 @@ static const struct seq_operations ima_policy_seqops = {
 #endif
 
 /*
- * ima_open_policy: sequentialize access to the policy file
+ * ima_open_data_upload: sequentialize access to the data upload interface
  */
-static int ima_open_policy(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
+static int ima_open_data_upload(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
 {
+	enum kernel_read_file_id file_id = ima_get_file_id(filp->f_path.dentry);
+	const struct seq_operations *seq_ops = NULL;
+	enum ima_fs_flags flag = IMA_FS_BUSY;
+	bool read_allowed = false;
+
+	if (file_id == READING_POLICY) {
+		flag = IMA_POLICY_BUSY;
+#ifdef	CONFIG_IMA_READ_POLICY
+		read_allowed = true;
+		seq_ops = &ima_policy_seqops;
+#endif
+	}
+
 	if (!(filp->f_flags & O_WRONLY)) {
-#ifndef	CONFIG_IMA_READ_POLICY
-		return -EACCES;
-#else
+		if (!read_allowed)
+			return -EACCES;
 		if ((filp->f_flags & O_ACCMODE) != O_RDONLY)
 			return -EACCES;
 		if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
 			return -EPERM;
-		return seq_open(filp, &ima_policy_seqops);
-#endif
+		return seq_open(filp, seq_ops);
 	}
-	if (test_and_set_bit(IMA_FS_BUSY, &ima_fs_flags))
+	if (test_and_set_bit(flag, &ima_fs_flags))
 		return -EBUSY;
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -426,13 +438,19 @@ static int ima_open_policy(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
  * point to the new policy rules, and remove the securityfs policy file,
  * assuming a valid policy.
  */
-static int ima_release_policy(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
+static int ima_release_data_upload(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
 {
+	enum kernel_read_file_id file_id = ima_get_file_id(file->f_path.dentry);
 	const char *cause = valid_policy ? "completed" : "failed";
 
 	if ((file->f_flags & O_ACCMODE) == O_RDONLY)
 		return seq_release(inode, file);
 
+	if (file_id != READING_POLICY) {
+		clear_bit(IMA_FS_BUSY, &ima_fs_flags);
+		return 0;
+	}
+
 	if (valid_policy && ima_check_policy() < 0) {
 		cause = "failed";
 		valid_policy = 0;
@@ -454,16 +472,16 @@ static int ima_release_policy(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
 	securityfs_remove(ima_policy);
 	ima_policy = NULL;
 #else
-	clear_bit(IMA_FS_BUSY, &ima_fs_flags);
+	clear_bit(IMA_POLICY_BUSY, &ima_fs_flags);
 #endif
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static const struct file_operations ima_measure_policy_ops = {
-	.open = ima_open_policy,
+static const struct file_operations ima_data_upload_ops = {
+	.open = ima_open_data_upload,
 	.write = ima_write_data,
 	.read = seq_read,
-	.release = ima_release_policy,
+	.release = ima_release_data_upload,
 	.llseek = generic_file_llseek,
 };
 
@@ -502,7 +520,7 @@ int __init ima_fs_init(void)
 
 	ima_policy = securityfs_create_file("policy", POLICY_FILE_FLAGS,
 					    ima_dir, NULL,
-					    &ima_measure_policy_ops);
+					    &ima_data_upload_ops);
 	if (IS_ERR(ima_policy))
 		goto out;
 
-- 
2.9.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info@ http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-07-25 15:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-25 15:44 [PATCH 00/12] ima: measure digest lists instead of individual files Roberto Sassu
2017-07-25 15:44 ` Roberto Sassu
2017-07-25 15:44 ` [PATCH 01/12] ima: generalize ima_read_policy() Roberto Sassu
2017-07-25 15:44   ` Roberto Sassu
2017-07-25 15:44 ` [PATCH 02/12] ima: generalize ima_write_policy() Roberto Sassu
2017-07-25 15:44   ` Roberto Sassu
2017-07-25 15:44 ` Roberto Sassu [this message]
2017-07-25 15:44   ` [PATCH 03/12] ima: generalize policy file operations Roberto Sassu
2017-07-25 15:44 ` [PATCH 04/12] ima: use ima_show_htable_value to show hash table data Roberto Sassu
2017-07-25 15:44   ` Roberto Sassu
2017-07-25 15:44 ` [PATCH 05/12] ima: add functions to manage digest lists Roberto Sassu
2017-07-25 15:44   ` Roberto Sassu
2017-07-25 15:44 ` [PATCH 06/12] ima: added parser of digest lists metadata Roberto Sassu
2017-07-25 15:44   ` Roberto Sassu
2017-07-27  5:15   ` kbuild test robot
2017-07-27  5:15     ` kbuild test robot
2017-08-01 10:17   ` [PATCH, RESEND " Roberto Sassu
2017-08-01 10:17     ` Roberto Sassu
2017-07-25 15:44 ` [PATCH 07/12] ima: added parser for compact digest list Roberto Sassu
2017-07-25 15:44   ` Roberto Sassu
2017-07-25 15:44 ` [PATCH 08/12] ima: added parser for RPM data type Roberto Sassu
2017-07-25 15:44   ` Roberto Sassu
2017-07-27  5:03   ` kbuild test robot
2017-07-27  5:03     ` kbuild test robot
2017-08-01 10:20   ` [PATCH, RESEND " Roberto Sassu
2017-08-01 10:20     ` Roberto Sassu
2017-08-01 10:27     ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-01 10:27       ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-01 10:58       ` Roberto Sassu
2017-08-01 10:58         ` Roberto Sassu
2017-08-01 10:58         ` Roberto Sassu
2017-08-02  7:22         ` [Linux-ima-devel] " James Morris
2017-08-02  7:22           ` James Morris
2017-08-02  7:22           ` James Morris
2017-08-02 11:22           ` Roberto Sassu
2017-08-02 11:22             ` Roberto Sassu
2017-08-02 11:22             ` Roberto Sassu
2017-08-09  9:15           ` Roberto Sassu
2017-08-09  9:15             ` Roberto Sassu
2017-08-09  9:15             ` Roberto Sassu
2017-08-09 14:30             ` Mimi Zohar
2017-08-09 14:30               ` Mimi Zohar
2017-08-09 14:30               ` Mimi Zohar
2017-08-09 17:18               ` Roberto Sassu
2017-08-09 17:18                 ` Roberto Sassu
2017-08-09 17:18                 ` Roberto Sassu
2017-08-10 13:12                 ` Mimi Zohar
2017-08-10 13:12                   ` Mimi Zohar
2017-08-10 13:12                   ` Mimi Zohar
2017-08-17  9:15                   ` Roberto Sassu
2017-08-17  9:15                     ` Roberto Sassu
2017-08-17  9:15                     ` Roberto Sassu
2017-07-25 15:44 ` [PATCH 09/12] ima: introduce securityfs interfaces for digest lists Roberto Sassu
2017-07-25 15:44   ` Roberto Sassu
2017-07-27  5:38   ` kbuild test robot
2017-07-27  5:38     ` kbuild test robot
2017-07-25 15:44 ` [PATCH 10/12] ima: disable digest lookup if digest lists are not measured Roberto Sassu
2017-07-25 15:44   ` Roberto Sassu
2017-07-25 15:44 ` [PATCH 11/12] ima: don't report measurements if digests are included in the loaded lists Roberto Sassu
2017-07-25 15:44   ` Roberto Sassu
2017-08-09 20:36   ` [Linux-ima-devel] " Ken Goldman
2017-08-09 20:36     ` Ken Goldman
2017-08-17  8:32     ` Roberto Sassu
2017-08-17  8:32       ` Roberto Sassu
2017-07-25 15:44 ` [PATCH 12/12] ima: added Documentation/security/IMA-digest-lists.txt Roberto Sassu
2017-07-25 15:44   ` Roberto Sassu
2017-12-05 22:28   ` [Linux-ima-devel] " Ken Goldman
2017-12-06  9:22     ` Roberto Sassu
2017-12-06  9:22       ` Roberto Sassu
2017-07-26 21:54 ` [PATCH 00/12] ima: measure digest lists instead of individual files Mimi Zohar
2017-07-26 21:54   ` Mimi Zohar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170725154423.24845-4-roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
    --to=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ima-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.