All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: rcar: Use common error handling code in rcar_pcie_enable_msi()
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 09:18:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171101081831.ssnuqp5b75lbfu5p@verge.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c598933b-b14f-91a1-c7a3-f4a46ec98e77@users.sourceforge.net>

On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 08:35:30AM +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 08:28:06 +0100
> 
> Adjust a jump target so that a specific error message is stored only once
> at the end of this function implementation.
> Replace two calls of the function "dev_err" by goto statements.
> 
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>

This is fine by me except that the change in the name of the goto label
seems spurious. If think it should be left as-is. But if you really want to
change it then as it is an error path I should suggest it describe that its
an error and what unwinding is done, f.e.  err_remove_domain.

> ---
>  drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c | 15 ++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c
> index 12796eccb2be..38101f8bebf1 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c
> @@ -873,18 +873,14 @@ static int rcar_pcie_enable_msi(struct rcar_pcie *pcie)
>  	err = devm_request_irq(dev, msi->irq1, rcar_pcie_msi_irq,
>  			       IRQF_SHARED | IRQF_NO_THREAD,
>  			       rcar_msi_irq_chip.name, pcie);
> -	if (err < 0) {
> -		dev_err(dev, "failed to request IRQ: %d\n", err);
> -		goto err;
> -	}
> +	if (err < 0)
> +		goto report_request_failure;
>  
>  	err = devm_request_irq(dev, msi->irq2, rcar_pcie_msi_irq,
>  			       IRQF_SHARED | IRQF_NO_THREAD,
>  			       rcar_msi_irq_chip.name, pcie);
> -	if (err < 0) {
> -		dev_err(dev, "failed to request IRQ: %d\n", err);
> -		goto err;
> -	}
> +	if (err < 0)
> +		goto report_request_failure;
>  
>  	/* setup MSI data target */
>  	msi->pages = __get_free_pages(GFP_KERNEL, 0);
> @@ -898,7 +894,8 @@ static int rcar_pcie_enable_msi(struct rcar_pcie *pcie)
>  
>  	return 0;
>  
> -err:
> +report_request_failure:
> +	dev_err(dev, "failed to request IRQ: %d\n", err);
>  	irq_domain_remove(msi->domain);
>  	return err;
>  }
> -- 
> 2.14.3
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: rcar: Use common error handling code in rcar_pcie_enable_msi()
Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2017 08:18:31 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171101081831.ssnuqp5b75lbfu5p@verge.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c598933b-b14f-91a1-c7a3-f4a46ec98e77@users.sourceforge.net>

On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 08:35:30AM +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 08:28:06 +0100
> 
> Adjust a jump target so that a specific error message is stored only once
> at the end of this function implementation.
> Replace two calls of the function "dev_err" by goto statements.
> 
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>

This is fine by me except that the change in the name of the goto label
seems spurious. If think it should be left as-is. But if you really want to
change it then as it is an error path I should suggest it describe that its
an error and what unwinding is done, f.e.  err_remove_domain.

> ---
>  drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c | 15 ++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c
> index 12796eccb2be..38101f8bebf1 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c
> @@ -873,18 +873,14 @@ static int rcar_pcie_enable_msi(struct rcar_pcie *pcie)
>  	err = devm_request_irq(dev, msi->irq1, rcar_pcie_msi_irq,
>  			       IRQF_SHARED | IRQF_NO_THREAD,
>  			       rcar_msi_irq_chip.name, pcie);
> -	if (err < 0) {
> -		dev_err(dev, "failed to request IRQ: %d\n", err);
> -		goto err;
> -	}
> +	if (err < 0)
> +		goto report_request_failure;
>  
>  	err = devm_request_irq(dev, msi->irq2, rcar_pcie_msi_irq,
>  			       IRQF_SHARED | IRQF_NO_THREAD,
>  			       rcar_msi_irq_chip.name, pcie);
> -	if (err < 0) {
> -		dev_err(dev, "failed to request IRQ: %d\n", err);
> -		goto err;
> -	}
> +	if (err < 0)
> +		goto report_request_failure;
>  
>  	/* setup MSI data target */
>  	msi->pages = __get_free_pages(GFP_KERNEL, 0);
> @@ -898,7 +894,8 @@ static int rcar_pcie_enable_msi(struct rcar_pcie *pcie)
>  
>  	return 0;
>  
> -err:
> +report_request_failure:
> +	dev_err(dev, "failed to request IRQ: %d\n", err);
>  	irq_domain_remove(msi->domain);
>  	return err;
>  }
> -- 
> 2.14.3
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-01  8:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-30  7:35 [PATCH] PCI: rcar: Use common error handling code in rcar_pcie_enable_msi() SF Markus Elfring
2017-10-30  7:35 ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-11-01  8:18 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2017-11-01  8:18   ` Simon Horman
2017-11-01  8:57   ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-11-01  8:57     ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-11-02  8:12     ` Simon Horman
2017-11-02  8:12       ` Simon Horman
2017-11-02 13:00       ` [PATCH v2] " SF Markus Elfring
2017-11-02 13:00         ` SF Markus Elfring
2017-11-02 19:25         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-11-02 19:25           ` Geert Uytterhoeven

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171101081831.ssnuqp5b75lbfu5p@verge.net.au \
    --to=horms@verge.net.au \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=elfring@users.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.