[RFC PATCH] ima: require secure_boot rules in lockdown mode

From: sfr@canb.auug.org.au (Stephen Rothwell)
To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH] ima: require secure_boot rules in lockdown mode
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 07:53:34 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171109075334.1809f4cc@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1510173982.4484.30.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Hi Mimi,

On Wed, 08 Nov 2017 15:46:22 -0500 Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> [Cc'ing Stephen Rothwell]
> 
> On Tue, 2017-10-31 at 14:25 +1100, James Morris wrote:
> > On Mon, 30 Oct 2017, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> >   
> > > James is staging the subsystem patches independently of each other, in
> > > case of a similar problem, so that they can be pulled separately.
> > > ?There's a new "next-general" branch.  
> > 
> > If you send me a pull request, I'm combining branches into next-testing, 
> > too, which is pulled into -next.  
> 
> linux-next already has the IMA patches, which might be confusing.

Not if they are the same *commits* i.e. if the tree/branch that James
merges is the same as the one that I already merge of yours
(git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/zohar/linux-integrity#next)
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html