From: roberto.sassu@huawei.com (Roberto Sassu) To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Subject: [RFC][PATCH v2 2/9] ima: preserve flags in ima_inode_post_setattr() if file must be appraised Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 11:56:03 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20171130105610.15761-3-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20171130105610.15761-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> Before commit d79d72e02485 ("ima: per hook cache integrity appraisal status"), ima_inode_post_setattr() clears the iint flags only if the file does not match policy rules after attributes changed. After the commit above, it clears the flags in any case. This patch restores the original behavior. Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com> --- security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c index 1b56ee949315..a54ad18affb1 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c @@ -360,11 +360,13 @@ void ima_inode_post_setattr(struct dentry *dentry) must_appraise = ima_must_appraise(inode, MAY_ACCESS, POST_SETATTR); iint = integrity_iint_find(inode); if (iint) { - iint->flags &= ~(IMA_APPRAISE | IMA_APPRAISED | - IMA_APPRAISE_SUBMASK | IMA_APPRAISED_SUBMASK | - IMA_ACTION_RULE_FLAGS); if (must_appraise) iint->flags |= IMA_APPRAISE; + else + iint->flags &= ~(IMA_APPRAISE | IMA_APPRAISED | + IMA_APPRAISE_SUBMASK | + IMA_APPRAISED_SUBMASK | + IMA_ACTION_RULE_FLAGS); } if (!must_appraise) __vfs_removexattr(dentry, XATTR_NAME_IMA); -- 2.11.0 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com> To: <linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org> Cc: <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>, <silviu.vlasceanu@huawei.com>, Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com> Subject: [RFC][PATCH v2 2/9] ima: preserve flags in ima_inode_post_setattr() if file must be appraised Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 11:56:03 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20171130105610.15761-3-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20171130105610.15761-1-roberto.sassu@huawei.com> Before commit d79d72e02485 ("ima: per hook cache integrity appraisal status"), ima_inode_post_setattr() clears the iint flags only if the file does not match policy rules after attributes changed. After the commit above, it clears the flags in any case. This patch restores the original behavior. Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com> --- security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c index 1b56ee949315..a54ad18affb1 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c @@ -360,11 +360,13 @@ void ima_inode_post_setattr(struct dentry *dentry) must_appraise = ima_must_appraise(inode, MAY_ACCESS, POST_SETATTR); iint = integrity_iint_find(inode); if (iint) { - iint->flags &= ~(IMA_APPRAISE | IMA_APPRAISED | - IMA_APPRAISE_SUBMASK | IMA_APPRAISED_SUBMASK | - IMA_ACTION_RULE_FLAGS); if (must_appraise) iint->flags |= IMA_APPRAISE; + else + iint->flags &= ~(IMA_APPRAISE | IMA_APPRAISED | + IMA_APPRAISE_SUBMASK | + IMA_APPRAISED_SUBMASK | + IMA_ACTION_RULE_FLAGS); } if (!must_appraise) __vfs_removexattr(dentry, XATTR_NAME_IMA); -- 2.11.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-30 10:56 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2017-11-30 10:56 [RFC][PATCH v2 0/9] ima: integrity models for appraised files Roberto Sassu 2017-11-30 10:56 ` Roberto Sassu 2017-11-30 10:56 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 1/9] ima: pass filename to ima_rdwr_violation_check() Roberto Sassu 2017-11-30 10:56 ` Roberto Sassu 2017-12-01 17:38 ` Mimi Zohar 2017-12-01 17:38 ` Mimi Zohar 2017-11-30 10:56 ` Roberto Sassu [this message] 2017-11-30 10:56 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 2/9] ima: preserve flags in ima_inode_post_setattr() if file must be appraised Roberto Sassu 2017-12-01 16:31 ` Mimi Zohar 2017-12-01 16:31 ` Mimi Zohar 2017-11-30 10:56 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 3/9] ima: preserve iint flags if security.ima update is successful Roberto Sassu 2017-11-30 10:56 ` Roberto Sassu 2017-12-01 18:06 ` Mimi Zohar 2017-12-01 18:06 ` Mimi Zohar 2017-11-30 10:56 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 4/9] ima: introduce ima_mk_null_file() Roberto Sassu 2017-11-30 10:56 ` Roberto Sassu 2017-11-30 10:56 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 5/9] ima: measure/appraise/audit inherited file descriptors Roberto Sassu 2017-11-30 10:56 ` Roberto Sassu 2017-11-30 10:56 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 6/9] ima: enforce the Biba strict policy on appraised files Roberto Sassu 2017-11-30 10:56 ` Roberto Sassu 2017-11-30 10:56 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 7/9] ima: enforce the Biba low watermark for objects " Roberto Sassu 2017-11-30 10:56 ` Roberto Sassu 2017-11-30 10:56 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 8/9] ima: introduce policy action try_appraise Roberto Sassu 2017-11-30 10:56 ` Roberto Sassu 2017-11-30 10:56 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 9/9] ima: don't measure files with valid appraisal status Roberto Sassu 2017-11-30 10:56 ` Roberto Sassu
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20171130105610.15761-3-roberto.sassu@huawei.com \ --to=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \ --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.