All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] IIO: ADC: fix return value check in stm32_dfsdm_adc_probe()
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 21:28:37 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180111212837.minmnjkvhudstafs@mwanda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1515669161-125426-1-git-send-email-weiyongjun1@huawei.com>

On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 11:12:41AM +0000, Wei Yongjun wrote:
> In case of error, the function devm_iio_device_alloc() returns NULL
> pointer not ERR_PTR(). The IS_ERR() test in the return value check
> should be replaced with NULL test.
> 
> Fixes: e2e6771c6462 ("IIO: ADC: add STM32 DFSDM sigma delta ADC support")
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/iio/adc/stm32-dfsdm-adc.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-dfsdm-adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-dfsdm-adc.c
> index e628d04..5e87140 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-dfsdm-adc.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-dfsdm-adc.c
> @@ -1100,9 +1100,9 @@ static int stm32_dfsdm_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	dev_data = (const struct stm32_dfsdm_dev_data *)of_id->data;
>  
>  	iio = devm_iio_device_alloc(dev, sizeof(*adc));
> -	if (IS_ERR(iio)) {
> +	if (!iio) {
>  		dev_err(dev, "%s: Failed to allocate IIO\n", __func__);
> -		return PTR_ERR(iio);
> +		return -ENOMEM;
>  	}
>  
>  	adc = iio_priv(iio);
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This one doesn't return an error pointer either.  The check causes a
static check warning for me.  (It can't actually fail, though so maybe
it will return an error pointer in the future?)

regards,
dan carpenter


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
	Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
	Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>,
	Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
	Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@st.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] IIO: ADC: fix return value check in stm32_dfsdm_adc_probe()
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 00:28:37 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180111212837.minmnjkvhudstafs@mwanda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1515669161-125426-1-git-send-email-weiyongjun1@huawei.com>

On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 11:12:41AM +0000, Wei Yongjun wrote:
> In case of error, the function devm_iio_device_alloc() returns NULL
> pointer not ERR_PTR(). The IS_ERR() test in the return value check
> should be replaced with NULL test.
> 
> Fixes: e2e6771c6462 ("IIO: ADC: add STM32 DFSDM sigma delta ADC support")
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/iio/adc/stm32-dfsdm-adc.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-dfsdm-adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-dfsdm-adc.c
> index e628d04..5e87140 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-dfsdm-adc.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-dfsdm-adc.c
> @@ -1100,9 +1100,9 @@ static int stm32_dfsdm_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	dev_data = (const struct stm32_dfsdm_dev_data *)of_id->data;
>  
>  	iio = devm_iio_device_alloc(dev, sizeof(*adc));
> -	if (IS_ERR(iio)) {
> +	if (!iio) {
>  		dev_err(dev, "%s: Failed to allocate IIO\n", __func__);
> -		return PTR_ERR(iio);
> +		return -ENOMEM;
>  	}
>  
>  	adc = iio_priv(iio);
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This one doesn't return an error pointer either.  The check causes a
static check warning for me.  (It can't actually fail, though so maybe
it will return an error pointer in the future?)

regards,
dan carpenter

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: dan.carpenter@oracle.com (Dan Carpenter)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH -next] IIO: ADC: fix return value check in stm32_dfsdm_adc_probe()
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 00:28:37 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180111212837.minmnjkvhudstafs@mwanda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1515669161-125426-1-git-send-email-weiyongjun1@huawei.com>

On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 11:12:41AM +0000, Wei Yongjun wrote:
> In case of error, the function devm_iio_device_alloc() returns NULL
> pointer not ERR_PTR(). The IS_ERR() test in the return value check
> should be replaced with NULL test.
> 
> Fixes: e2e6771c6462 ("IIO: ADC: add STM32 DFSDM sigma delta ADC support")
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/iio/adc/stm32-dfsdm-adc.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-dfsdm-adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-dfsdm-adc.c
> index e628d04..5e87140 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-dfsdm-adc.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-dfsdm-adc.c
> @@ -1100,9 +1100,9 @@ static int stm32_dfsdm_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	dev_data = (const struct stm32_dfsdm_dev_data *)of_id->data;
>  
>  	iio = devm_iio_device_alloc(dev, sizeof(*adc));
> -	if (IS_ERR(iio)) {
> +	if (!iio) {
>  		dev_err(dev, "%s: Failed to allocate IIO\n", __func__);
> -		return PTR_ERR(iio);
> +		return -ENOMEM;
>  	}
>  
>  	adc = iio_priv(iio);
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This one doesn't return an error pointer either.  The check causes a
static check warning for me.  (It can't actually fail, though so maybe
it will return an error pointer in the future?)

regards,
dan carpenter

  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-11 21:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-11 11:12 [PATCH -next] IIO: ADC: fix return value check in stm32_dfsdm_adc_probe() Wei Yongjun
2018-01-11 11:12 ` Wei Yongjun
2018-01-11 11:12 ` Wei Yongjun
2018-01-11 21:28 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2018-01-11 21:28   ` Dan Carpenter
2018-01-11 21:28   ` Dan Carpenter
2018-01-12  1:37   ` weiyongjun (A)
2018-01-12  1:37     ` weiyongjun (A)
2018-01-12  1:37     ` weiyongjun (A)
2018-01-12  9:37     ` Arnaud Pouliquen
2018-01-12  9:37       ` Arnaud Pouliquen
2018-01-12  9:37       ` Arnaud Pouliquen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180111212837.minmnjkvhudstafs@mwanda \
    --to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.