All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
To: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
	linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
	Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] backlight: pwm_bl: don't use GPIOF_* with gpiod_get_direction
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 17:26:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180413162644.bej6yrgmqc2y3nfe@holly.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180413160824.GD31310@phenom.ffwll.local>

On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 06:08:24PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 09:32:16AM +0200, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 02:32:40PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > The documentation was wrong, gpiod_get_direction() returns 0/1 instead
> > > of the GPIOF_* flags. The docs were fixed with commit 94fc73094abe47
> > > ("gpio: correct docs about return value of gpiod_get_direction"). Now,
> > > fix this user (until a better, system-wide solution is in place).
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
> > > Acked-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
> > 
> > > ---
> > > 
> > > Changes since V1:
> > > 	* rebased to top-of-linus-tree
> > > 	* added tag from Daniel, thanks!
> > > 
> > > Through which tree does this need to go?
> 
> I think Daniel Thompson has one ...

Sorry, I didn't spot the question at the bottom of the change block. 
For backlight patches generally go though Lee Jones' tree.


Daniel.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
To: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
	linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
	Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] backlight: pwm_bl: don't use GPIOF_* with gpiod_get_direction
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 17:26:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180413162644.bej6yrgmqc2y3nfe@holly.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180413160824.GD31310@phenom.ffwll.local>

On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 06:08:24PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 09:32:16AM +0200, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 02:32:40PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > The documentation was wrong, gpiod_get_direction() returns 0/1 instead
> > > of the GPIOF_* flags. The docs were fixed with commit 94fc73094abe47
> > > ("gpio: correct docs about return value of gpiod_get_direction"). Now,
> > > fix this user (until a better, system-wide solution is in place).
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
> > > Acked-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
> > 
> > > ---
> > > 
> > > Changes since V1:
> > > 	* rebased to top-of-linus-tree
> > > 	* added tag from Daniel, thanks!
> > > 
> > > Through which tree does this need to go?
> 
> I think Daniel Thompson has one ...

Sorry, I didn't spot the question at the bottom of the change block. 
For backlight patches generally go though Lee Jones' tree.


Daniel.
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
To: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
	linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
	Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] backlight: pwm_bl: don't use GPIOF_* with gpiod_get_direction
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 16:26:44 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180413162644.bej6yrgmqc2y3nfe@holly.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180413160824.GD31310@phenom.ffwll.local>

On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 06:08:24PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 09:32:16AM +0200, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 02:32:40PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > The documentation was wrong, gpiod_get_direction() returns 0/1 instead
> > > of the GPIOF_* flags. The docs were fixed with commit 94fc73094abe47
> > > ("gpio: correct docs about return value of gpiod_get_direction"). Now,
> > > fix this user (until a better, system-wide solution is in place).
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
> > > Acked-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
> > 
> > > ---
> > > 
> > > Changes since V1:
> > > 	* rebased to top-of-linus-tree
> > > 	* added tag from Daniel, thanks!
> > > 
> > > Through which tree does this need to go?
> 
> I think Daniel Thompson has one ...

Sorry, I didn't spot the question at the bottom of the change block. 
For backlight patches generally go though Lee Jones' tree.


Daniel.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-13 16:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-10 12:32 [PATCH RESEND] backlight: pwm_bl: don't use GPIOF_* with gpiod_get_direction Wolfram Sang
2018-04-10 12:32 ` Wolfram Sang
2018-04-11  7:32 ` Simon Horman
2018-04-11  7:32   ` Simon Horman
2018-04-13 16:08   ` Daniel Vetter
2018-04-13 16:08     ` Daniel Vetter
2018-04-13 16:08     ` Daniel Vetter
2018-04-13 16:26     ` Daniel Thompson [this message]
2018-04-13 16:26       ` Daniel Thompson
2018-04-13 16:26       ` Daniel Thompson
2018-04-16  9:12   ` Lee Jones
2018-04-16  9:12     ` Lee Jones
2018-04-16  9:12     ` Lee Jones
2018-04-24  8:41     ` Simon Horman
2018-04-24  8:41       ` Simon Horman
2018-04-24  9:12       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-04-24  9:12         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-04-24  9:12         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-04-24 10:07         ` Lee Jones
2018-04-24 10:07           ` Lee Jones
2018-04-24 10:07           ` Lee Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180413162644.bej6yrgmqc2y3nfe@holly.lan \
    --to=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
    --cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=horms@verge.net.au \
    --cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.