From: Keith Busch <keith.busch@linux.intel.com> To: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>, linux-nvme <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>, Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>, Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] blk-mq: Remove generation seqeunce Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 09:17:57 -0600 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20180522151757.GB8295@localhost.localdomain> (raw) In-Reply-To: <CACVXFVO5sujPWiAJJgA6E=Exmb1c8FTyN-7+YEvNQ+0c_Psh8w@mail.gmail.com> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 11:07:07PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > > At approximately the same time, you're saying the driver that returned > > EH_HANDLED may then call blk_mq_complete_request() in reference to the > > *old* request that it returned EH_HANDLED for, incorrectly completing > > Because this request has been completed above by blk-mq timeout, > then this old request won't be completed any more via blk_mq_complete_request() > either from normal path or what ever, such as cancel. > > the new request before it is done. That will inevitably lead to data > > corruption. Is that happening today in any driver? > > No such issue since current blk-mq makes sure one req is only completed > once, but your patch changes to depend on driver to make sure that. The blk-mq timeout complete makes the request available for allocation as a new command, at which point blk_mq_complete_request can be called again. If a driver is somehow relying on blk-mq to prevent a double completion for a previously completed request context, they're already in a lot of trouble.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: keith.busch@linux.intel.com (Keith Busch) Subject: [RFC PATCH 3/3] blk-mq: Remove generation seqeunce Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 09:17:57 -0600 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20180522151757.GB8295@localhost.localdomain> (raw) In-Reply-To: <CACVXFVO5sujPWiAJJgA6E=Exmb1c8FTyN-7+YEvNQ+0c_Psh8w@mail.gmail.com> On Tue, May 22, 2018@11:07:07PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > > At approximately the same time, you're saying the driver that returned > > EH_HANDLED may then call blk_mq_complete_request() in reference to the > > *old* request that it returned EH_HANDLED for, incorrectly completing > > Because this request has been completed above by blk-mq timeout, > then this old request won't be completed any more via blk_mq_complete_request() > either from normal path or what ever, such as cancel. > > the new request before it is done. That will inevitably lead to data > > corruption. Is that happening today in any driver? > > No such issue since current blk-mq makes sure one req is only completed > once, but your patch changes to depend on driver to make sure that. The blk-mq timeout complete makes the request available for allocation as a new command, at which point blk_mq_complete_request can be called again. If a driver is somehow relying on blk-mq to prevent a double completion for a previously completed request context, they're already in a lot of trouble.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-22 15:17 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 128+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2018-05-21 23:11 [RFC PATCH 0/3] blk-mq: Timeout rework Keith Busch 2018-05-21 23:11 ` Keith Busch 2018-05-21 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] blk-mq: Reference count request usage Keith Busch 2018-05-21 23:11 ` Keith Busch 2018-05-22 2:27 ` Ming Lei 2018-05-22 2:27 ` Ming Lei 2018-05-22 15:19 ` Christoph Hellwig 2018-05-22 15:19 ` Christoph Hellwig 2018-05-21 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] blk-mq: Fix timeout and state order Keith Busch 2018-05-21 23:11 ` Keith Busch 2018-05-22 2:28 ` Ming Lei 2018-05-22 2:28 ` Ming Lei 2018-05-22 15:24 ` Christoph Hellwig 2018-05-22 15:24 ` Christoph Hellwig 2018-05-22 16:27 ` Bart Van Assche 2018-05-22 16:27 ` Bart Van Assche 2018-05-21 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] blk-mq: Remove generation seqeunce Keith Busch 2018-05-21 23:11 ` Keith Busch 2018-05-21 23:29 ` Bart Van Assche 2018-05-21 23:29 ` Bart Van Assche 2018-05-22 14:15 ` Keith Busch 2018-05-22 14:15 ` Keith Busch 2018-05-22 16:29 ` Bart Van Assche 2018-05-22 16:29 ` Bart Van Assche 2018-05-22 16:34 ` Keith Busch 2018-05-22 16:34 ` Keith Busch 2018-05-22 16:48 ` Bart Van Assche 2018-05-22 16:48 ` Bart Van Assche 2018-05-22 2:49 ` Ming Lei 2018-05-22 2:49 ` Ming Lei 2018-05-22 3:16 ` Jens Axboe 2018-05-22 3:16 ` Jens Axboe 2018-05-22 3:47 ` Ming Lei 2018-05-22 3:47 ` Ming Lei 2018-05-22 3:51 ` Jens Axboe 2018-05-22 3:51 ` Jens Axboe 2018-05-22 8:51 ` Ming Lei 2018-05-22 8:51 ` Ming Lei 2018-05-22 14:35 ` Jens Axboe 2018-05-22 14:35 ` Jens Axboe 2018-05-22 14:20 ` Keith Busch 2018-05-22 14:20 ` Keith Busch 2018-05-22 14:37 ` Ming Lei 2018-05-22 14:37 ` Ming Lei 2018-05-22 14:46 ` Keith Busch 2018-05-22 14:46 ` Keith Busch 2018-05-22 14:57 ` Ming Lei 2018-05-22 14:57 ` Ming Lei 2018-05-22 15:01 ` Keith Busch 2018-05-22 15:01 ` Keith Busch 2018-05-22 15:07 ` Ming Lei 2018-05-22 15:07 ` Ming Lei 2018-05-22 15:17 ` Keith Busch [this message] 2018-05-22 15:17 ` Keith Busch 2018-05-22 15:23 ` Ming Lei 2018-05-22 15:23 ` Ming Lei 2018-05-22 16:17 ` Christoph Hellwig 2018-05-22 16:17 ` Christoph Hellwig 2018-05-23 0:34 ` Ming Lei 2018-05-23 0:34 ` Ming Lei 2018-05-23 14:35 ` Keith Busch 2018-05-23 14:35 ` Keith Busch 2018-05-24 1:52 ` Ming Lei 2018-05-24 1:52 ` Ming Lei 2018-05-23 5:48 ` Hannes Reinecke 2018-05-23 5:48 ` Hannes Reinecke 2018-07-12 18:16 ` Bart Van Assche 2018-07-12 18:16 ` Bart Van Assche 2018-07-12 19:24 ` Keith Busch 2018-07-12 19:24 ` Keith Busch 2018-07-12 22:24 ` Bart Van Assche 2018-07-12 22:24 ` Bart Van Assche 2018-07-13 1:12 ` jianchao.wang 2018-07-13 1:12 ` jianchao.wang 2018-07-13 2:40 ` jianchao.wang 2018-07-13 2:40 ` jianchao.wang 2018-07-13 15:43 ` Keith Busch 2018-07-13 15:43 ` Keith Busch 2018-07-13 15:52 ` Bart Van Assche 2018-07-13 15:52 ` Bart Van Assche 2018-07-13 18:47 ` Keith Busch 2018-07-13 18:47 ` Keith Busch 2018-07-13 23:03 ` Bart Van Assche 2018-07-13 23:03 ` Bart Van Assche 2018-07-13 23:58 ` Keith Busch 2018-07-13 23:58 ` Keith Busch 2018-07-18 19:56 ` hch 2018-07-18 19:56 ` hch 2018-07-18 20:39 ` hch 2018-07-18 20:39 ` hch 2018-07-18 21:05 ` Bart Van Assche 2018-07-18 21:05 ` Bart Van Assche 2018-07-18 22:53 ` Keith Busch 2018-07-18 22:53 ` Keith Busch 2018-07-18 20:53 ` Keith Busch 2018-07-18 20:53 ` Keith Busch 2018-07-18 20:58 ` Bart Van Assche 2018-07-18 20:58 ` Bart Van Assche 2018-07-18 21:17 ` Keith Busch 2018-07-18 21:17 ` Keith Busch 2018-07-18 21:30 ` Bart Van Assche 2018-07-18 21:30 ` Bart Van Assche 2018-07-18 21:33 ` Keith Busch 2018-07-18 21:33 ` Keith Busch 2018-07-19 13:19 ` hch 2018-07-19 13:19 ` hch 2018-07-19 14:59 ` Keith Busch 2018-07-19 14:59 ` Keith Busch 2018-07-19 15:56 ` Keith Busch 2018-07-19 15:56 ` Keith Busch 2018-07-19 16:04 ` Bart Van Assche 2018-07-19 16:04 ` Bart Van Assche 2018-07-19 16:22 ` Keith Busch 2018-07-19 16:22 ` Keith Busch 2018-07-19 16:29 ` hch 2018-07-19 16:29 ` hch 2018-07-19 20:18 ` Keith Busch 2018-07-19 20:18 ` Keith Busch 2018-07-19 13:22 ` hch 2018-07-19 13:22 ` hch 2018-05-21 23:29 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] blk-mq: Timeout rework Bart Van Assche 2018-05-21 23:29 ` Bart Van Assche 2018-05-22 14:06 ` Keith Busch 2018-05-22 14:06 ` Keith Busch 2018-05-22 16:30 ` Bart Van Assche 2018-05-22 16:30 ` Bart Van Assche 2018-05-22 16:44 ` Keith Busch 2018-05-22 16:44 ` Keith Busch
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20180522151757.GB8295@localhost.localdomain \ --to=keith.busch@linux.intel.com \ --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \ --cc=bart.vanassche@wdc.com \ --cc=hch@lst.de \ --cc=keith.busch@intel.com \ --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \ --cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.